Information Exchange in Group Decision Making: The Hidden Profile Problem Reconsidered

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0975

References

  • Anderson L. R., Holt C. A. Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87:847–862Google Scholar
  • Blinder A. S., Morgan J. Are two heads better than one? Monetary policy by committee. J. Money, Credit Banking (2005) 37:789–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brodbeck F. C., Kerschreiter R., Mojzisch A., Shulz-Hardt S. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:459–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen K.-Y., Fine L. R., Huberman B. A. Eliminating public knowledge biases in information-aggregation mechanisms. Management Sci. (2004) 50(7):983–994LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cosier R. A. The effects of three potential aids for making strategic decisions on prediction accuracy. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1978) 22:295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis J. H., Kameda T., Stasson M. F., Yates J. F. Group risk taking: Selected topics. Risk-Taking Behavior (1992) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 163–181Google Scholar
  • Dellarosa D., Bourne L. E. Decisions and memory: Differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory information. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. (1984) 23:669–682CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R. Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think. MIS Quart. (1996) 20:433–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fraidin S. N. When is one head better than two? Interdependent information in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 93(2):102–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goeree J. K., Palfrey T. R., Rodgers B. W., McKelvey R. D. Self-correcting information cascades. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 74:733–762CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Klein K. J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32:1199–1228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Sheppard B. H., Davis J. H., Guzzo R. A. Group remembering: Research and implications. Improving Group Decision Making in Organizations (1982) (Academic Press, New York) 41–72Google Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. The rank order effect in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68:181–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein K. J., Harrison D. A. On the diversity of diversity: Tidy logic, messier realities. Acad. Management Perspectives (2007) 21:26–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R., Foster-Fishman P. G., Keys C. B. Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:446–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rulke D. L., Galaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):612–625LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schachter S. Deviation, rejection, and communication. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46:190–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz-Hardt S., Frey D., Luthgens C., Moscovici S. Biased information search in group decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 78:655–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siegel-Jacobs K., Yates J. F. Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 65:1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G. Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1988) 24:393–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:426–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Taylor L. A. Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 60:675–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48:1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53:81–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Hidden profiles: A brief history. Psych. Inquiry (2003) 14:304–313CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. D., Wittenbaum G. M. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1995) 31:244–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart D. D., Stasser G. Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 69:619–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunder S., Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. Experimental asset markets: A survey. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 445–500Google Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt M. C., Ogden T. Y., Neale M. A. Who's really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):464–477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber S. S., Donahue L. M. Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. J. Management (2001) 27 :141–162Google Scholar
  • Wittenbaum G. M., Park E. S. The collective preference for shared information. Current Directions Psych. Sci. (2001) 10:70–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.