Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment

References

• Abadie A., Diamond A., Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. (2007) . NBER Working Paper 12831, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal A., Cockburn I. M., McHale J. Gone but not forgotten: Labor flows, knowledge spillovers, and enduring social relationships. J. Econom. Geography (2006) 6(5):571–591Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal R., Ganco M., Ziedonis R. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Ai C., Norton E. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80:123–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917Link, Google Scholar
• Alterman I. New era for covenants not to compete. Michigan Bar J. (1985) March):258Google Scholar
• Anton J. J., Yao D. A. Start-ups, spin-offs, and internal projects. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1995) 11(2):362–378Google Scholar
• Arrow K., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ) 609–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):630–640Google Scholar
• Bagley C. E. (2006) . Personal communication with M. Marx. BostonGoogle Scholar
• Bauer J. R. (2007) . Personal communication with M. Marx and L. Fleming, May 7Google Scholar
• Becker G. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):9–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(1):249–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bullard P. Michigan Antitrust Reform Act: House Bill 4994, first analysis. (1983a) . M.S.A. Sec.: 1-8Google Scholar
• Bullard P. Michigan Antitrust Reform Act: House Bill 4994, second analysis. (1983b) . M.S.A. Sec.: 1-4Google Scholar
• Bullard P. Michigan Antitrust Reform Act: House Bill 4994, third analysis. (1985) . M.S.A. Sec.: 1-4Google Scholar
• Decker K.Covenants Not to Compete (1993) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Efron B., Tibshirani R.An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Monograph in Applied Statistics and Probability (1994) 57(Chapman and Hall, New York) Google Scholar
• Fallick B., Fleischman C., Rebitzer J. Job-hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(3):472–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., King C., Juda A. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954Link, Google Scholar
• Garmaise M. Ties that truly bind: Non-competition agreements, executive compensation, and firm investment. (2007) . Working paper, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Gilson R. J. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and covenants not to compete. New York Univ. Law Rev. (1999) 74:575–629Google Scholar
• Glenn N. D., Kempf-Leonard K. Age, period, and cohort effects. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (2005) (Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 27–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gompers P., Lerner J., Scharfstein D. Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):577–614Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1379Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1991) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hoetker G. The use of probit and logit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28:331–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyde A.Working in Silicon Valley: Economic and Legal Analysis of a High-Velocity Labor Market (2003) (M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
• Jaffe A., Lerner J.Innovation and Its Discontents (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B. Firm-specific capital and turnover. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(6):1246–1260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan S. N., Stromberg P. Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):426–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J., Marschke G. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(2):298–317Google Scholar
• Klepper S. The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):645–666Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spinoffs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306Link, Google Scholar
• Lamoreaux N. R., Levenstein M., Sokoloff K. Mobilizing venture capital during the second industrial revolution: Cleveland, Ohio, 1870–1920. Capitalism Soc. (2006) 1(3):1–61Google Scholar
• Lane J., Parkin M. Turnover in an accounting firm. J. Labor Econom. (1998) 16(4):702–717Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaVan H. A logit model to predict the enforceability of non-compete agreements. Employee Responsibilities Rights J. (2000) 12(4):219–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. P., Oyer P. The structure of wages and internal mobility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(2):212–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 1987(3):783–831Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levine J. A. Covenants not to compete, nonsolicitation and trade secret provisions of stock purchase agreements. Michigan Bar J. (1985) November):1248Google Scholar
• Lifland W. T.State Antitrust Law (1984) (Law Journal Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Malsberger B. M.Covenants Not to Compete: A State-by-State Survey (1996) (The Bureau of National Affairs, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Marsden P., Hurlbert J. Social resources and mobility outcomes: A replication and extension. Soc. Forces (1988) 66(4):1038–1059Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller S. (2005) . Personal communication with M. Marx, March 26. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Mobley W. H., Griffeth R. W., Hand H. H., Meglino B. M. Review and conceptual analysis of the employee turnover process. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86:493–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Motta M., Roende T. Trade secret laws, labour mobility and innovations. (2002) . CEPR Discussion Paper 3615, Centre for Economic Policy Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Pakes A., Nitzan S. Optimum contracts for research personnel, research deployment, and the establishment of “rival” enterprises. J. Labor Econom. (1982) 1(4):345–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter L. W., Steers R. M. Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psych. Bull. (1973) 80(2):151–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabaut L. (2006) . Personal interview via phone from Cambridge, MA, to Grand Rapids, MI, November 7Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766Link, Google Scholar
• Saxenian A.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Sikkel R. W. (2006) . Personal interview via phone from Cambridge, MA, to Grand Rapids, MI, November 9Google Scholar
• Sikkel R. W., Rabaut L. C. Michigan takes a new look at trade secrets and non-compete agreements. Michigan Bar J. (1985) October):1069Google Scholar
• Singh J. Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2007) 38(5):764–786Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh J. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy (2008) 37(1):77–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singleton J. Auto industry jobs in the 1980s: A decade of transition. Monthly Labor Rev. (1992) 115(18):18–27Google Scholar
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365Link, Google Scholar
• Stolpe M. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: The case of liquid crystal display technology. Res. Policy (2002) 31(7):1181–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T., Sorenson O. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:175–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor A., Greve H. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):723–740Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topel R. Specific capital, mobility, and wages: Wages rise with job seniority. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(1):145–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trajtenberg M., Shiff G., Melamed R. The “names game”: Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12479, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Trim C. Non-compete agreements: House Bill 4072, first analysis. (1987a) . M.H.L.A. Sec.: 1Google Scholar
• Trim C. Non-compete agreements: House Bill 4072, second analysis. (1987b) . M.H.L.A. Sec.: 1Google Scholar
• Valiulis A.Covenants Not to Compete: Forms, Tactics, and the Law (1985) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Wagner W., Pfeffer J., O'Reilly C. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(1):74–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whaley S. The inevitable disaster of inevitable disclosure. University of Cincinnati Law Rev. (1999) 67:809–857Google Scholar
• White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica (1980) 48(4):817–838Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wood J. S. A comparison of the enforceability of covenants not to compete and recent economic histories of four high technology regions. Virginia J. Law Tech. Assoc. (2000) 14(Fall):1522–1687Google Scholar