Selection Neglect in Mutual Fund Advertisements

References

• Barber B. M., Odean T., Zheng L. Out of sign, out of mind: The effects of expenses on mutual fund flows. J. Bus. (2005) 78:2095–2119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. J., Goetzmann W. N. Performance persistence. J. Finance (1995) 50:679–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buckless F. A., Ravenscroft S. P. Contrast coding: A refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis. Accounting Rev. (1990) 65:933–945Google Scholar
• Cain D. M., Loewenstein G. F., Moore D. A. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. J. Legal Stud. (2005) 34:1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capon N., Fitzsimmons G. J., Prince R. A. An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decision. J. Financial Serv. Res. (1996) 10:59–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carhart M. M. On persistence in mutual funds performance. J. Finance (1997) 52:57–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chamberlain J., DeCarlo S., Zajac B. Mutual fund survey. Forbes (2009) January 14). http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/14/mutual-fund-investing-funds109-pf-ii_jc_sd_bz_0114intro.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Clements J. Rewriting history: How mutual funds hide mistakes by closing bad performers. Wall Street Journal (2002) July 10):D1Google Scholar
• Daniel K., Hirshleifer D., Teoh S. H. Investor psychology in capital markets: Evidence and policy implications. J. Mon. Econom. (2002) 49:139–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J. Vicarious learning, undersampling of failure, and the myths of management. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14:227–243Link, Google Scholar
• Denrell J. Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psych. Rev. (2007) 114:177–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diacon S. Investment risk perceptions: Do consumers and advisors agree? Internat. J. Bank Marketing (2004) 22:180–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. (1978) 85:395–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiedler K. Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psych. Rev. (2000) 107:659–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiedler K. The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making. J. Experiment. Psych: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2008) 34:186–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiske S. T., Taylor S. E.Social Cognition (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert D. T., Krull D. S., Malone P. S. Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 49:601–613Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamill R., Wilson T. D., Nisbett R. Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39:578–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hearst E. Psychology and nothing. Amer. Sci. (1991) 79:432–443Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:153–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks D., Patel J., Zeckhauser R. Hot hands in mutual funds: Short-run persistence of relative performance, 1974–1988. J. Finance (1993) 48:93–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland P. W. Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equations models. Sociol. Methodology (1988) 18:449–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model. (1999) 6:1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain P. C., Wu J. S. Truth in mutual fund advertising: Evidence on future performance and fund flows. J. Finance (2000) 55:937–958Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jordan J., Kass K. P. Advertising in the mutual fund business: The role of judgmental heuristics in private investors' evaluation of risk and return. J. Financial Serv. Marketing (2002) 7:129–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Frederick S., Gilovich T., Griffin D., Kahneman D. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 49–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler J. J. The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Normative, descriptive and methodological challenges. Behavioral Brain Sci. (1996) 19:1–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler J. J., Thompson W. C. Mock jurors' reactions to selective presentation of evidence from multiple-opportunity searches. Law Human Behav. (2006) 30:455–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malkiel B. G. Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971 to 1991. J. Finance (1995) 50:549–572Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nisbett R. E., Ross L.Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (1980) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Nisbett R. E., Krantz D. H., Jepson C., Kunda Z. The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psych. Rev. (1983) 90:339–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M. Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 17:775–816Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosnow R. L., Rosenthal R. Contrasts and interactions redux: Five easy pieces. Psych. Sci. (1996) 7:253–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapira Z., Venezia I. Patterns of behavior of professional managed and independent investors. J. Banking Finance (2001) 25:1573–1587Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanovich K. E., West R. F. Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral Brain Sci. (2000) 23:645–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stanovich K. E., West R. F. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2008) 94:672–695Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. (1971) 76:105–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilcox R. T. Bargain hunting or star gazing? Investors' preferences for stock mutual funds. J. Bus. (2003) 76:645–663Crossref, Google Scholar