Privacy Protection and Technology Diffusion: The Case of Electronic Medical Records

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1014

References

  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Privacy and security solutions for interoperable health information exchange. (2007) . Report, http://www.rti.org/pubs/nationwide_ summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Ai C., Norton E. C. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. (2003) 80(1):123–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D. Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociol. Methodology (1982) 13:61–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Christakis N. A. Fixed effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociol. Methodology (2006) 36(1):155–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J. D. Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2001) 19(1):2–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angst C., Agarwal R. Overcoming personal barriers to adoption when technology enables information to be available to others. (2006) . Research Paper RHS 06-033, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Angst C. M., Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V. Propensity, susceptibility, infectiousness, and proximity: Predicting organizational diffusion of electronic medical records. (2008) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin G. Roundtable: Information technology and the community hospital. (2005) . Report, HealthLeaders Media, Marblehead, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Besley T., Case A. Unnatural experiments? Estimating the incidence of endogenous policies. Econom. J. (2000) 110:F672–F694Google Scholar
  • Borzekowski R. Health care finance and the early adoption of hospital information systems. (2002) . Report 2002-41, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Bower A. G.The Diffusion and Value of Healthcare Information Technology (2005) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Boyens C., Krishnan R., Padman R. On privacy-preserving access to distributed heterogeneous healthcare information. Proc. Proc. 37th Annual HICSS'04—Track 6 (2004) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 60135.1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brailer D. J. Interoperability: The key to the future health care system. Health Affairs (2005) January 19). http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/full/hlthaff.w5.19/DC1Google Scholar
  • Calcanis C. Milwaukee group develops EMR to reduce ER costs. Medical Informatics Insider (2005) November 15). http://www.medicalinformaticsinsider.com/2005/11/15/milwaukee-group-to-launch-emergeny-room-emr-system/Google Scholar
  • California HealthCare Foundation National Consumer Health Privacy Survey 2005. (2005) . Report, California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland, http://www.chcf.org/topics/view.cfm?itemid=115694Google Scholar
  • Chowdhury S. D., Duncan G. T., Krishnan R., Roehrig S. F., Mukherjee S. Disclosure detection in multivariate categorical databases: Auditing confidentiality protection through two new matrix operators. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1710–1723LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chwelos P., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):304–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ciliberto F. Does organizational form affect investment decisions? J. Indust. Econom. (2006) 54(1):63–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ciliberto F., Dranove D. The effect of physician-hospital affiliations on hospital prices in California. J. Health Econom. (2006) 25(1):29–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Covich Bordenick J., Marchibroda J., Welebob E. Improving the quality of healthcare through health information exchange. (2006) . Report, eHealth Initiative, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Fonkych K., Taylor R.The State and Pattern of Health Information Technology Adoption (2005) (RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Garfinkel R., Gopal R., Goes P. Privacy protection of binary confidential data against deterministic, stochastic, and insider threat. Management Sci. (2002) 48(6):749–764LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gostin L., Lazzarini Z., Flaherty K. Legislative survey of state confidentiality laws, with specific emphasis on HIV and immunization. (1996) . Report presented to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Electronic Privacy Information Center, Washington, DC, http://epic.org/privacy/medical/cdc_survey.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Gowrisankaran G., Stavins J. Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. RAND J. Econom. (2004) 35(2):260–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groopman J.How Doctors Think (2007) (Houghton Mifflin Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hillestad R., Bigelow J., Bower A., Girosi F., Meili R., Scoville R., Taylor R. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs (2005) 24(5):1103–1117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman S., Podgurski A. Finding a cure: The case for regulation and oversight of electronic health record systems. Harvard J. Law Tech. (2008) 22(1):103–165Google Scholar
  • Kadane J. B., Krishnan R., Shmueli G. A data disclosure policy for count data based on the COM-Poisson distribution. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1610–1617LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karshenas M., Stoneman P. L. Rank, stock, order, and epidemic effects in the diffusion of new process technologies: An empirical model. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24(4):503–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Wang Y. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaushal R., Blumenthal D., Poon E. G., Jha A. K., Franz C., Middleton B., Glaser J., et al. The costs of a national health information network. Ann. Internal Medicine (2005) 143(3):165–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kazley A., Ozcan Y. A. Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: A national study. J. Medical Systems (2007) 31(5):375–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Makuc D. M., Haglund B., Ingram D. D., Kleinman J. C., Feldman J. J. Health service areas for the United States. (1991) . Report, DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 92-1386, Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • McCarthy D. B., Shatin D., Drinkard C. R., Kleinman J. H., Gardner J. S. Medical records and privacy: Empirical effects of legislation. Health Services Res. (1999) 34(1 Pt 2):417–425Google Scholar
  • Miller A. R., Tucker C. Can healthcare IT save babies? (2008) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Miller A. R., Tucker C. Electronic discovery and electronic medical records: Does the threat of litigation affect firm decisions to adopt technology? (2009) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Posner R. A. The economics of privacy. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1981) 71(2):405–409Google Scholar
  • Pritts J., Choy A., Emmart L., Hustead J.The State of Health Privacy: A Survey of State Health Privacy Statutes (2002) 2nd ed.(Georgetown University, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Pritts J., Goldman J., Hudson Z., Berenson A., Hadley E.The State of Health Privacy: An Uneven Terrain. A Comprehensive Survey of State Health Privacy Statutes (1999) 1st ed.(Georgetown University, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Riggins F. J., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. The growth of interorganizational systems in the presence of network externalities. Management Sci. (1994) 40(8):984–998LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson B. Privacy, funding doubts shutter Calif. RHIO. (2007) . Government Health IT (March 8), http://govhealthit.com/Articles/2007/03/Privacy-funding-doubts-shutter-Calif-RHIO.aspxGoogle Scholar
  • Rysman M. Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71(2):483–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon S. R., Kaushal R., Cleary P. D., Jenter C. A., Volk L. A., Poon E. G., Orav J. E., Lo H. G., Williams D. H., Bates D. W. Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: A statewide survey. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. (2007) 14(1):110–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):287–304LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. Economic aspects of personal privacy. Privacy and Self-Regulation in the Information Age (1997) (National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Varian H., Wallenberg F., Woroch G. The demographics of the do-not-call list. IEEE Security Privacy (2005) 3(1):34–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vetter G. R. Slouching toward open innovation: Free and open source software (FOSS) for electronic health information. Washington Univ. J. Law Policy (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Vrana D. Regulators fine kaiser unit $200,000. Los Angeles Times (2005) June 21). http://articles.latimes.com/2005/jun/21/business/fi-kaiser21Google Scholar
  • Welsh K. Continued progress: Hospital use of information technology. (2007) . American Hospital Association, Washington, DC, http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/materials/05_07/ehr/welsh.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Westin A. F. Testimony of Dr. Alan F. Westin, Professor of Public Law & Government Emeritus, Columbia University. (2005) . At the Hearing on Privacy and Health Information Technology, NCVHS Subcommittee on Privacy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Win K. T., Fulcher J. A. Consent mechanisms for electronic health record systems: A simple yet unresolved issue. J. Medical Systems (2007) 31:91–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.