Truthful Bundle/Multiunit Double Auctions

References

• Babaioff M., Walsh W. Incentive-compatible, budget-balanced, yet highly efficient auctions for supply chain formation. Fourth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2003) (ACM, New York) 64–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babaioff M., Nisan N., Pavlov E. Mechanisms for a spatially distributed market. Fifth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2004) (ACM, New York) 9–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Karuga G. Optimal design of the online auction channel: Analytical, empirical and computational insights. Decision Sci. (2002) 33(4):557–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazaraa M. S., Jarvis J. J., Sherali H. D.Linear Programming and Network Flows (1990) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Chu L. Y., Shen Z.-J. Agent competition double auction mechanism. Management Sci. (2006) 52(8):1215–1222Link, Google Scholar
• Chu L. Y., Shen Z.-J. Trade reduction vs. multi-stage: A comparison of double-auction design approaches. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2007) 180(2):677–691Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chu L. Y., Shen Z.-J. Truthful double-auction mechanisms. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):102–120Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke E. H. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice (1971) 11:17–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Vries S., Vohra R. V. Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS J. Comput. (2003) 15(3):284–309Link, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby W. The importance of ordering in sequential auctions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(5):673–682Link, Google Scholar
• Fan M., Stallaert J., Whinston A. B. Decentralized mechanism design for supply chain organizations using an auction market. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(1):1–22Link, Google Scholar
• Gallien J., Wein L. M. A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity constraints. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):76–91Link, Google Scholar
• Gonen M., Gonen R., Pavlov E. Generalized trade reduction mechanisms. Eighth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2007) (ACM, New York) 20–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groves T. Incentives in teams. Econometrica (1973) 41(4):617–631Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo Z., Koehler G. J., Whinston A. B. A market-based optimization algorithm for distributed systems. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1345–1358Link, Google Scholar
• Huang P., Scheller-Wolf A., Sycara K. Design of a multi-unit double-auction e-market. Comput. Intelligence (2002) 18(4):596–617Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain R., Varaiya P. The combinatorial seller's bid double-auction: An asymptotically efficient market mechanism. J. Econom. Theory (2006) . Working paper, IBM Watson Research, Hawthorne, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Jennergren L. P., Muller W. Simulation experiments of resource-allocation decisions in two-level organizations. Soc. Sci. Res. (1973) 2:333–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ledyard J. O. Optimal combinatoric auctions with single-minded bidders. Eighth ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2007) (ACM, New York) 237–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehmann D., O'Callaghan I., Shoham Y. Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. J. ACM (2002) 49(5):577–602Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P. A dominant strategy double auction. J. Econom. Theory (1992) 56(2):434–450Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R. B., Satterthwaite M. A. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econom. Theory (1983) 28:265–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pekeč A., Rothkopf M. H. Combinatorial auction design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1485–1503Link, Google Scholar
• Pinker E. J., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. The design of online auctions: Business issues and current research. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf M. H., Harstad R. M. Modeling competitive bidding: A critical essay. Management Sci. (1994) 40(3):364–384Link, Google Scholar
• Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance (1961) 16(1):8–37Crossref, Google Scholar