Business Unit Reorganization and Innovation in New Product Markets

References

• Abernathy W. J., Clark K. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res. Policy (1985) 14:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansoff H. I.Corporate Strategy (1965) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Argote L. Organizational learning curves: Persistence, transfer and turnover. Internat. J. Tech. Management (1996) 11(7, 8):759–769Google Scholar
• Argyris C., Schön D. A.Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (1978) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Arrow K. The implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962) 29:155–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barkema H. G., Schijven M. Towards unlocking the full potential of acquisitions: The role of organizational restructuring. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(4):696–722Google Scholar
• Belsley D. A.Conditioning Diagnostics, Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression (1991) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Belsey D. A., Kuh E., Welsch R.Regression Diagnostics (1980) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw J., Lingblad M. Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multibusiness firm. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):674–686Link, Google Scholar
• Blau J., McKinley W. Ideas, complexity, and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24(2):200–219Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowman E. H., Singh H., Rock R. Corporate restructuring: Trends and consequences. Corporate Restructuring (1990) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 8–22Google Scholar
• Brickley J. A., Van Drunen L. D. Internal corporate restructuring: An empirical analysis. J. Accounting Econom. (1990) 12(1–3):251–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L., Mitchell W. Bilateral resource redeployment and capabilities improvement following horizontal acquisitions. Indust. Corporate Change (1998) 7(3):453–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Capron L., Dussauge P., Mitchell W. Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988–1992. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(7):631–661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll T., Karim S., Bøllingtoft A., Håkonsson D. D., Nielsen J. F., Snow C. C., Ulhøi J. Predicting organizational reconfiguration. New Approaches to Organization Design: Theory and Practice of Adaptive Enterprises (2009) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chandler A.Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ciborra C. U. The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):103–118Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constable J. Diversification as a factor in U.K. industrial strategy. Long Range Planning (1986) 19:52–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Weick K. E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):284–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damanpour F. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):693–716Link, Google Scholar
• Dodgson M. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organ. Stud. (1993) 14(3):375–394Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards T. Innovation and organizational change: Developments towards an interactive process perspective. Tech. Anal. Strategic Management (2000) 12(4):445–464Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Brown S. L. Patching: Restitching business portfolios in dynamic markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(3):71–82Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Figueroa E., Conceicao P. Rethinking the innovation process in large organizations: A case study of 3M. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (2000) 17(1):93–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol C., Lyles M. Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(4):803–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. The evolution of intracorporate domains: Divisional charter losses in high-technology, multidivisional corporations. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):255–282Link, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Eisenhardt K. M. Architectural innovation and modular coporate forms. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1229–1249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galunic D. C., Rodan S. Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(12):1193–1201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Summer Special Issue):93–109Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gleick J.Chaos: The Making of a New Science (1987) (Heinemann, London) Google Scholar
• Granstrand O., Sjolander S. The acquisition of technology and small firms by large firms. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1990) 13:367–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haleblian J., Finkelstein S. The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):29–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines' learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):609–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward M. L. A. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990–1995. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(1):21–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedberg B., Nystrom P., Starbuck W. How organizations learn and unlearn. Handbook of Organizational Design (1981) 1(Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 3–27Google Scholar
• Helfat C. E., Eisenhardt K. M. Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(13):1217–1232Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E., Ireland R. D. Mergers and acquisitions and managerial commitment to innovation in M-form firms. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11(Summer):29–47Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R. E. Multidivisional structure and performance: The contingency of diversification strategy. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30(4):625–644Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R. E., Galbraith C. S. The effect of quantum versus incremental M-form reorganization on performance: A time-series exploration of intervention dynamics. J. Management (1985) 11(3):55–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoskisson R. O., Johnson R. A. Corporate restructuring and strategic change: The effect on diversification strategy and R&D intensity. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(8):625–634Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Johnson R. Antecedents and outcomes of corporate refocusing. J. Management (1996) 22(3):439–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge G. G., Hill R. C., Griffiths W. E., Lutkepol H.Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics (1988) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S. Modularity in organizational structure: The reconfiguration of internally developed and acquired business units. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(9):799–823Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S., Mitchell W. Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reorganizing business resources following acquisitions in the U.S. medical sector, 1978–1995. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1061–1081Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karim S., Mitchell W. Innovating through acquisition and internal development: A quarter-century of boundary evolution at Johnson & Johnson. Long Range Planning (2004) 37(6):525–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A. Antichaos and adaptation. Sci. Amer. (1991) 265(2):78–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order (1992) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Keats B. W., Hitt M. A. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(3):570–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Lane P. J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive learning and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(5):461–477Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langlois R. N., Robertson P. L. Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Res. Policy (1992) 21(4):297–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lei D., Hitt M. A., Goldhar J. D. Advanced manufacturing technology: Organizational design and strategic flexibility. Organ. Stud. (1996) 17(3):501–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lind J. T., Mehlum H. With or without U? The appropriate test for a U shaped relationship. (2007) . Working paper, Univerity of Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar
• Long J.Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (1997) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Lyles M. A. Learning among joint-venture sophisticated firms. Management Internat. Rev. (1988) 28:85–98Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(Winter):85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pitts R. A. Strategies and structures for diversification. Acad. Management J. (1977) 20(2):197–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1987) 65(3):43–59Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Bettis R. The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(6):485–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R. Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Summer Special Issue):135–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter Special Issue):63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Vidal P., Ployhart R. E., Marangoni A. Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):39–56Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
• Stacey R. D. The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(6):477–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waldrop M. M.Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos (1992) (Viking, London) Google Scholar