Price-Dependent Profit Sharing as a Channel Coordination Device

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1019

References

  • Basu A. K., Lal R., Srinivasan V., Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspective. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(4):267–291LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blair R. D., Lafontaine F.The Economics of Franchising (2005) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strenghts and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chu W. Demand signaling and screening in channels of distribution. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(4):324–347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dana J. D., Spier K. E. Revenue-sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49:223–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demski J. S., Sappington D. E. M. Optimal incentive contracts with multiple agents. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 33(1):152–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S. Multiple messages to retain retailers: Signaling new product demand. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):381–389LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S., Srinivasan K. Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: Linear and nonlinear price contracts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1608–1623LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The Texting the television. (2002) October 19Google Scholar
  • Economist, The No text please, we're American. (2003) April 5Google Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ingene C. A., Parry M. E. Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(4):360–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D., Pazgal A. The effects of cost and competition on slotting allowances. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(2):259–267LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R. Improving channel coordination through franchising. Marketing Sci. (1990) 9(4):299–318LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Staelin R. Salesforce compensation plans in environments with asymmetric information. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5(3):179–198LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lariviere M., Padmanabhan V. Slotting allowances and new product introductions. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(2):112–128LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathewson G. F., Winter R. A. An economic theory of vertical restraints. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15:27–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mortimer J. H. Vertical contracts in the video rental industry. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2008) 75(1):165–199CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Motta M.Competition Policy: Theory and Practice (2004) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen P., Aanestad M. Control devolution as information infrastructure design strategy: A case study of a content service platform for mobile phones in Norway. J. Inform. Tech. (2006) 21(3):185–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao R. C., Srinivasan S. Why are royalty rates higher in service-type franchises? J. Econom. Management Strategy (1995) 4(1):7–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rey P., Tirole J. The logic of vertical restraints. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(5):921–931Google Scholar
  • Shaffer G. Slotting allowances and resale price maintenance: A comparison of facilitating practices. RAND J. Econom. (1991) 22(1):120–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Shubik M., Levitan R.Market Structure and Behavior (1980) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strand J. Norwegian operators push premium SMS. New Media Age (2004) September 30Google Scholar
  • Swedish Post and Telecom Agency The Norwegian SMS-market—A summary. (2002) . Report PTS-ER-2002:23, Swedish Post and Telecom Agency, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  • Telser L. G. Why should manufacturers want fair trade? J. Law Econom. (1960) 3:86–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.