Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds? The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision

References

• Allen V. L. Situational factors in conformity. Adv. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1965) 2(3):133–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S.Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (2001) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Asch S. E., Guetzkow H. S. Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, Leadership and Men: Research in Human Relations (1951) (Carnegie Press, Pittsburgh) 177–190Google Scholar
• Birnbaum M. H., Stegner S. E. Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 37(1):48–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S., Dalal R. S. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 101(2):127–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bond R. Group size and conformity. Group Processes Intergroup Relations (2005) 8(4):331–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braver S. L., Sheets V. L. Monotonic hypotheses in multiple group designs: A Monte Carlo study. Psych. Bull. (1993) 113(2):379–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunswik E. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psych. Rev. (1955) 62(3):193–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Fiedler K., Juslin P. Confidence in aggregation of opinions from multiple sources. Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 327–352Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Rantilla A. K. Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions. Acta Psychologica (2000) 104(3):371–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu D. V., Rantilla A. K., Yu H. T., Karelitz T. M. The effects of asymmetry among advisors on the aggregation of their opinions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 90(1):178–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell J. D., Fairey P. J. Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(3):457–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemen R. T. Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. Int. J. Forecasting (1989) 5(4):559–583Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooksey R. W.Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods, and Applications (1996) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Darke P. R., Chaiken S., Bohner G., Einwiller S., Erb H. P., Hazlewood J. D. Accuracy motivation, consensus information, and the law of large numbers: Effects on attitude judgment in the absence of argumentation. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. (1998) 24(11):1205–1215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R. M., Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psych. Bull. (1974) 81(2):95–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deutsch M., Gerard H. B. A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1955) 51:629–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devine D. J., Clayton L. D., Philips J. L., Dunford B. B., Melner S. B. Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Res. (1999) 30(6):678–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economist, The Market, market, on the wall. (2005) December 10):12Google Scholar
• Edwards W., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Conservatism in human information processing. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 359–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1975) 13(2):171–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M., Klempner E. Quality of group judgment. Psych. Bull. (1977) 84(1):158–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7(2):117–140Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer I., Harvey N. Combining forecasts: What information do judges need to outperform the simple average? Int. J. Forecasting (1999) 15(3):227–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gigone D., Hastie R. Proper analysis of the accuracy of group judgments. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121(1):149–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberg S. C. Three situational determinants of conformity to social norms. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1954) 49(3):325–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N., Fischer I. Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 70(2):117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N., Harries C. Effects of judges' forecasting on their later combination of forecasts for the same outcomes. Int. J. Forecasting (2004) 20(3):391–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N., Harries C., Fischer I. Using advice and assessing its quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 81(2):252–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hastie R., Grofman B., Owen G. Experimental evidence on group accuracy. Information Pooling and Group Decision Making (1986) 2(JAI Press, London) 129–157Google Scholar
• Hill G. W. Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psych. Bull. (1982) 91(3):517–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinsz V. B., Tindale R. S., Vollrath D. A. The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psych. Bull. (1997) 121(1):43–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman P. J. The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psych. Bull. (1960) 57(2):116–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M. Note on aggregating opinions. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1978) 21(1):40–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Einhorn H. J. Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24(1):1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Rottenstreich Y., Xiao Z. X. When is more better? On the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Current Directions Psych. Sci. (2005) 14(5):234–237Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsee C. K., Loewenstein G. F., Blount S., Bazerman M. H. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(5):576–590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenness A. The role of discussion in changing opinion regarding a matter of fact. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1932) 27(3):279–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaplan M. F. Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in groups decision making. Adv. Group Processes (1989) 6:87–105Google Scholar
• Kelman H. C. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution (1958) 2(1):51–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keppel G.Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1982) 2nd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Koehler D. J., Beauregard T. A. Illusion of confirmation from exposure to another's hypothesis. J. Behav. Decision Making (2006) 19(1):61–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Larrick R. P., Soll J. B. Intuitions about combining opinions: Misappreciation of the averaging principle. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):111–127Link, Google Scholar
• Latané B. The psychology of social impact. Amer. Psychologist (1981) 36(4):343–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latané B., Wolf S. The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psych. Rev. (1981) 88(5):438–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Libby R., Blashfield R. K. Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1978) 21(2):121–129Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim J. S., O'Connor M. Judgmental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases. J. Behav. Decision Making (1995) 8(3):149–168Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maines L. A. An experimental examination of subjective forecast combination. Int. J. Forecasting (1996) 12(2):223–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S. Liberating effects of group pressure. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1965) 1(2):127–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S.Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Schkade D. A., Kahneman D. Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psych. Sci. (1998) 9(5):340–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif M. A study of some social factors in perception. Arch. Psych. (1935) 187:5–59Google Scholar
• Sniezek J. A., Van Swol L. M. Trust, confidence, and expertise in a Judge-Advisor System. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 84(2):288–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soll J. B., Larrick R. P. Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others' opinions. J. Exp. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2009) 35(3):780–805Crossref, Google Scholar
• Surowiecki J.The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations (2004) (Little, Brown, London) Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Lindzey G., Aronson E. Social and cultural factors in perception. The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969) 32nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, London) 315–394Google Scholar
• Tanford S., Penrod S. Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. Psych. Bull. (1984) 95(2):189–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Tversky A., Kahneman D. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Choices, Values, and Frames (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 269–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. (1971) 76(2):105–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Koehler D. J. Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101(4):547–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilder D. A. Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence. J. Exper. Soc. Psych. (1977) 13(3):253–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson T. D., Wheatley T., Meyers J. M., Gilbert D. T., Axsom D. Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 78(5):821–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I. Weighting and trimming: Heuristics for aggregating judgments under uncertainty. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(3):237–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I. Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 93(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I., Kleinberger E. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(2):260–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I., Milyavsky M. Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2007) 103(1):104–120Crossref, Google Scholar