Ultimatum Deadlines

References

• Avery C., Jolls C., Posner R. A., Roth A. E. The new market for federal judicial law clerks. Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. (2007) 74:447–486Google Scholar
• Baucells M., Lippman S. A. Bargaining with search as an outside option: The impact of the buyer's future availability. Decision Anal. (2004) 1(4):235–249Link, Google Scholar
• Bearden J. N. Ultimatum bargaining experiments: The state of the art. (2001) . Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
• Bearden J. N., Murphy R. O., Rapoport A. A multi-attribute extension of the secretary problem: Theory and experiments. J. Math. Psych. (2005) 49(5):410–422Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden J. N., Rapoport A., Murphy R. O. Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Management Sci. (2006) 52(9):1437–1449Link, Google Scholar
• Blount S., Bazerman M. The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1996) 30:227–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandts J., Charness G. Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Experiment. Econom. (2000) 2:227–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brosig J., Weimann J., Yang C.-L. The hot versus cold effect in a simple bargaining experiment. Experiment. Econom. (2003) 6:75–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnevale P. J. D., Lawler E. J. Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations. J. Conflict Resolution (1986) 30(4):636–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason T. N., Mui V. L. Social influence on the sequential dictator game. J. Math. Psych. (1998) 42:248–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee K., Samuelson W. Bargaining under incomplete information. Oper. Res. (1983) 31(5):835–851Link, Google Scholar
• Chun Y. H. Selecting the best choice in the full information group interview problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 119:635–651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chun Y. H., Moskowitz H., Plante R. Dynamic programming formulation of the group interview problem with a general utility function. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1994) 78:81–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan R., Zabczyk J. An optimal selection problem associated with the Poisson process. Theory Probab. Appl. (1978) 23:584–592Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox J. C., Oaxaca R. L. Laboratory experiments with a finite-horizon job-search model. J. Risk Uncertainty (1989) 2(3):301–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman P. R. The secretary problem with its extensions: A review. Internat. Statist. Rev. (1983) 51(2):189–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gale D., Shapley L. S. College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly (1962) 69:9–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert J. P., Mosteller F. Recognizing the maximum of a sequence. Amer. Statist. Assoc. J. (1966) 35–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gronau R. Information and frictional unemployment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1971) 61(3, Part 1):290–301Google Scholar
• Güth W., Huck S., Mueller W. The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games Econom. Behav. (2001) 37:161–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E., Schwartz A. Search theory: The case of search with uncertain recall. J. Econom. Theory (1977) 16(1):38–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lariviere M. A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates. Oper. Res. (2006) 54(3):602–604Link, Google Scholar
• Li H., Rosen S. Unraveling in matching markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(3):371–387Google Scholar
• Li H., Suen W. Self-fulfilling early-contracting rush. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2004) 45(1):301–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lippman S. A., McCall J. J. Job search in a dynamic economy. J. Econom. Theory (1976) 12(3):365–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen D. T. Job search, the duration of unemployment, and the Phillips curve. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1970) 60(5):847–862Google Scholar
• Mortensen D. T., Ashenfelter O., Layard R. Job search and labor market analysis. Handbook of Labor Economics (1987) 2(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 849–919Google Scholar
• Niederle M., Roth A. E. Making markets thick: Designing rules for offers and acceptances. (2007) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Oxoby R. J., McLeish K. N. Sequential decision and strategy vector methods in ultimatum bargaining: Evidence on the strength of other-regarding behavior. Econom. Lett. (2004) 84:399–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Presman E. L., Sonin I. M. Equilibrium points in a game related to the best choice problem. Theory Probab. Appl. (1972) 20:770–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Kagel J., Roth A. E. Bargaining experiments. Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 253–348Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Sotomayor M. A. O.Two-Sided Matching (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Xing X. Jumping the gun: Imperfections and instituitions related to the timing of market transactions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):992–1044Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Xing X. Turnaround time and bottlenecks in market clearing: Decentralized matching in the market for clinical psychologists. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105:284–329Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanfey A. G., Rillig J. K., Aronson J. A., Nystrom L. E., Cohen J. D. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science (2003) 300:1755–1758Crossref, Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite M. A., Williams S. R. Bilateral trade with the sealed bid k-double auction: Existence and efficiency. J. Econom. Theory (1989) 48:107–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale D. A., Rapoport A. Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the “secretary problem”. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 69(3):221–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale D. A., Rapoport A. Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: The secretary problem with unknown population size. J. Behavioral Deicsion Making (2000) 13(4):391–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale D. A., Daniel T. E., Rapoport A. The information advantage in two-person bargaining with incomplete information. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2001) 44:177–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked M., Shanthikumar J. G.Stochastic Orders and Their Applications (1994) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Stigler G. J. The economics of information. J. Political Econom. (1961) 69(3):213–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G. J. Information in the labor market. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):94–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher A. F., Champagne M. V. The impact of time pressure and information on negotiation process and decisions. Group Decision Negotiation (2000) 9:471–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stuhlmacher A. F., Gillespie T. L., Champagne M. V. The impact of time pressure in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Internat. J. Conflict Management (1998) 9:97–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suen W. A competitive theory of equilibrium and disequilibrium unraveling in two-sided matching. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31(3):101–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M., Kocher M., Strauß S. Bargaining under time pressure in an experimental ultimatum game. Econom. Lett. (2003) 81(3):341–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg G. J. Nonstationarity in job search theory. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1990) 57:255–277Crossref, Google Scholar