Technical Specialized Knowledge and Secondary Shares in Initial Public Offerings

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1051

References

  • Ahuja G., Coff R., Lee P. Managerial foresight and attempted rent appropriation: Insider trading on knowledge of imminent breakthroughs. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:791–808CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. The market for lemons: Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84:4889–5000CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alvarez S. A., Parker S. C. Emerging firms and the allocation of control rights: A Bayesian approach. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(2):209–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amit R., Brander J., Zott C. Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. J. Bus. Venturing (1998) 13(6):441–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amit R., Glosten L., Muller E. Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1232–1245LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ang J., Brau J. Concealing and confounding adverse signals: Insider wealth-maximizing behavior in the IPO process. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 67:149–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang J., Lin J. W., Tyler F. Evidence on the lack of separation between business and personal risk among small businesses. J. Small Bus. Finance (1995) 4:197–210Google Scholar
  • Argote L., McElvey W., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. The economic implications of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962a) 29:155–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962b) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Audretsch D., Stephan P. E. Company-scientist locational links: The case of biotechnology. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):641–652Google Scholar
  • Avery R., Bostic R., Samolyk K. The role of personal wealth in small business finance. J. Banking Finance (1998) 22:1019–1061CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry C. B. Initial public offering underpricing: The issuer's view-A comment. J. Finance (1989) 44(4):1099–1103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry C. B., Muscarella C. J., Peavy J. W., Vetsuypens M. R. The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 27:447–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D. Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(1):3–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Burton M. D., O'Reilly C. Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public. J. Bus. Venturing (2007) 22:147–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benveniste L. M., Ljungqvist A., Wilhelm W. J., Yu X. Evidence of information spillovers in the production of investment banking services. J. Finance (2003) 58(2):577–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradley D. J., Jordan B. D. Partial adjustment to public information and IPO underpricing. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2002) 37(4):595–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brau J. C., Li M., Shi J. Do secondary shares in the IPO process have a negative effect on aftermarket performance? J. Banking Finance (2007) 31(9):2612–2631CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton M. D., Beckman C. M. Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2007) 72(2):239–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campo-Rembado M., Taylor A. When do technology entrepreneurs start new ventures? Discontinuities, knowledge resources, and market entry. (2008) . Working paper, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NHGoogle Scholar
  • Carter R. B., Manaster S. Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. J. Finance (1990) 45(4):1045–1067CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carter R. B., Dark F. H., Singh A. K. Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. J. Finance (1998) 53(1):285–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Celikyurt U., Sevilir M., Shivdasani A. Going public to acquire? The acquisition motive in IPOs. (2008) . Working paper, University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  • Chemmanur T. J., Fulghieri P. Investment bank reputation, information production, and financial intermediation. J. Finance (1994) 49(1):57–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Churchill N., Lewis V. The five stages of small business growth. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1983) 16(3):30–39Google Scholar
  • Coff R., Lee P. Insider trading as a vehicle to appropriate rent from R&D. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:183–190CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W., Nelson R., Walsh J. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on Industrial R&D. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):1–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Colander D. C.Why Aren't Economists as Important as Garbagemen? Essays on the State of Economics (1991) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
  • Corwin S. A., Harris J. H. The initial listing decisions of firms that go public. Financial Management (2001) 30(1):35–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckhardt J. T., Shane S., Delmar F. Multistage selection and the funding of new ventures. Management Sci. (2006) 52(2):220–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E., French K. Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. (1997) 43(2):153–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field L., Hanka G. The expiration of IPO share lockups. J. Finance (2001) 56(2):471–500CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field L., Karpoff J. Takeover defenses of IPO firms. J. Finance (2002) 57(5):1857–1889CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer H. M., Pollock T. G. Effects of social capital and power on surviving transformational change: The case of initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):463–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P. Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. J. Finance (1995) 50(5):1461–1489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J.The Venture Capital Cycle (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gupta U.Done Deals: Venture Capitalists Tell Their Stories (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–162Google Scholar
  • Heeley M., Matusik S., Jain N. Innovation, appropriability, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(1):209–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hellmann T., Puri M. Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. J. Finance (2002) 57(1):169–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Inman R. The provision of services in a market economy. Managing the Service Economy: Prospects and Problems (1985) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 183–213Google Scholar
  • Hsu D. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? J. Finance (2004) 59(4):1805–1844CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hsu D. Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Sci. (2006) 52(2):204–219LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huyghebaert N., Van Hulle C. Structuring the IPO: Empirical evidence on the portions of primary and secondary shares. J. Corporate Finance (2006) 12:296–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ibbotson R. G., Ritter J. R. Initial public offerings. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (1995) 9(Elsevier, Oxford, UK) 993–1016Google Scholar
  • Jenkinson T., Ljungqvist A.Going Public: The Theory and Evidence on How Companies Raise Equity Finance (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M., Meckling W. Specific and general knowledge, and organizational structure. J. Appl. Corporate Finance (1995) 8(2):4–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Junkunc M. Managing radical innovation: The importance of specialized knowledge in the biotech revolution. J. Bus. Venturing (2007) 22(3):388–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Strömberg P. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70(2):281–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klevorick A., Levin R., Nelson R., Winter S. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Res. Policy (1995) 25:185–205CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kroll M., Walters B., Le S. A. The impact of board composition and top management team ownership structure on post-IPO performance in young entrepreneurial firms. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(5):1198–1216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leland H., Pyle D. Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. J. Finance (1977) 32(2):371–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. J. Finance (1995) 50(1):301–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsay P. H., Norman D. A.Human Information Processing (1977) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Loughran T., Ritter J. R. Why has IPO underpricing changed over time? Financial Management (2004) 33(3):5–37Google Scholar
  • Merrill S., McGeary M.Using Human Resource Data to Track Innovation (2002) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Michael S. Monitoring technical agents: Theory, evidence, and prescriptions. (2008) . Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  • Michelacci C., Suarez J. Business creation and stock market. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2004) 71:459–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Science FoundationScientists, Engineers, and Technicians in the United States: 2001 (2001) . NSF 05-313, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Arlington, VAGoogle Scholar
  • Pellmar T. C., Eisenberg L.Bridging Disciplines in the Brain, Behavioral, and Clinical Sciences (2000) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Piroli P. L., Anderson J. R. The role of learning from example in the acquisition of recursive programming skill. Canadian J. Psych. (1985) 39:240–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter J. R. The long-run performance of initial public offerings. J. Finance (1991) 46(1):3–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ritter J. R., Logue D. E., Seward J. K. Initial public offerings. Handbook of Modern Finance (1998) (Warren, Gorham, and Lamont, New York) 1–25Google Scholar
  • Ritter J. R., Welch I. A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. J. Finance (2002) 57(4):1795–1828CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rock K. Why new issues are underpriced. J. Financial Econom. (1986) 15:187–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sahlman W. The structure and governance of venture capital organizations. J. Financial Econom. (1990) 27:473–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza H. J., Gupta A. K. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture capitalist-CEO interaction. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(6):1618–1632CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Cable D. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):364–381LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sine W. D., Mitsuhashi H., Kirsch D. A. Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(1):121–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence A. M.Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Venkataraman S., Katz J., Brockhaus R. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor's perspective. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (1997) 3(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 119–138Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Teece D. J. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1990) (Harper & Row Publishers, New York) 169–184Google Scholar
  • Zenger T. R. Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. (1994) 40(6):708–729LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L., Darby M., Brewer M. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):290–306Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.