Decision Support for Retirement Portfolio Management: Overcoming Myopic Loss Aversion via Technology Design

References

• Ariely D.Predictably Irrational (2008) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Barber B. M., Odean T. The Internet and the investor. J. Econom. Perspectives (2001) 15(1):41–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick J. A., Spilker B. C. The relations between knowledge, search strategy, and performance in unaided and aided information search. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 90(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barsky R. B., Juster F. T., Kimball M. S., Shapiro M. D. Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: An experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):537–579Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(1):73–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benartzi S., Thaler R. H. Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Sci. (1999) 45(3):364–381Link, Google Scholar
• Benzion U., Rapoport A., Yagil J. Discount rates inferred from decisions: An experimental study. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):270–284Link, Google Scholar
• Bettman J. R., Kakkar P. Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. J. Consumer Res. (1977) 3(4):233–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodie Z., Kane A., Marcus A. J.Investments (2008) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Bodie Z., Merton R. C., Samuelson W. F. Labor supply flexibility and portfolio choice in a life-cycle model. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (1992) 16(3/4):427–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccio S., Dalal R. S. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 101(2):127–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brinson G. P., Hood L. R., Beebower G. L. Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analysts J. (1995) 51(1):133–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bromiley P., Curley S., Yates J. Individual differences in risk taking. Risk Taking Behavior (1992) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) 87–132Google Scholar
• Byrnes N. The rush to shut down pensions. Business Week (2006) January 9). http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jan2006/nf2006019_3388_db035.htmGoogle Scholar
• Cooper N. J., Keage H., Hermens D. The dose-dependent effect of methylphenidate on performance, cognition, and psychophysiology. J. Integrative Neuroscience (2005) 4(1):123–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramer J. J.Jim Cramer's Real Money (2005) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Google Scholar
• Cudeck R., Klebe K. J. Multiphase mixed-effects models for repeated measures data. Psych. Methods (2002) 7(1):41–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixom B. H., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):167–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frederick S., Lowenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preferences. J. Econom. Lett. (2002) 40(2):351–441Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Potter J. An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 11(2):631–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Rustichini A. Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):791–810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U., Kapteyn A., Potter J. Evaluation periods and asset prices in a market experiment. J. Finance (2003) 58(2):821–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haigh M. S., List J. A. Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance (2005) 60(1):523–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G. W., Johnson E., McInnes M. M., Rutström E. E. Risk aversion and incentive effects: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(3):897–901Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N., Fischer I. Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1997) 70(2):117–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harvey N., Harries C., Fischer I. Using advice and assessing its quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 81(2):252–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heyman J., Ariely D. Effort for payment: A tale of two markets. Psych. Sci. (2004) 15(11):787–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer D. Investor psychology and asset pricing. J. Finance (2001) 56(4):1533–1597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch S. J., Schkade D. A. A psychological approach to decision support systems. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):51–64Link, Google Scholar
• Holt C. A., Laury S. K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(5):1644–1655Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibbotson R.Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation 2001 Yearbook (2001) (Ibbotson Associates, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Investment Company InstituteFundamentals (2005a) 14(4(Investment Company Institute, Washington, DC) 1–8Google Scholar
• Investment Company InstitutePerspective (2005b) 14(4A(Investment Company Institute, Washington, DC) 1–30Google Scholar
• Jaggia S., Thosar S. Risk aversion and the investment horizon: A new perspective on the time diversification debate. J. Psych. Financial Markets (2000) 1(3/4):211–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. The effect of task and graphical format congruency on information processing strategies and decision making performance. Management Sci. (1989) 35(3):285–303Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Lovallo D. Time choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Sci. (1993) 39(1):17–31Link, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keren G., Roelofsma P. Immediacy and certainty in intemporal choice. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1995) 63(3):287–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Rangaswamy A., van Bruggen G. H., Starke K. DSS effectiveness in marketing resource allocation decisions: Reality vs. perception. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):215–235Link, Google Scholar
• Limayem M., DeSanctis G. Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):386–411Link, Google Scholar
• Looney C. A., Valacich J. S., Todd P. A., Morris M. G. Paradoxes of online investing: Testing the influence of technology on user expectancies. Decision Sci. (2006) 37(2):205–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lusardi A., Mitchell O. S. Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Bus. Econom. (2007) 42(1):35–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mackay J. M., Elam J. J. A comparative study of how experts and novices use a decision aid to solve problems in complex knowledge domains. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(2):150–172Link, Google Scholar
• Mehra R., Prescott E. C. The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1985) 15:145–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:81–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minch P. R., Sanders G. L. Computerized information systems supporting multicriteria decision making. Decision Sci. (1986) 17(2):395–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• mmexecutive.com 401(k) assets shift to stable value, money market funds grow 70%. (2009) January 16). http://www.mmexecutive.com/news/189319-1.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Opdyke J. D. Investment options proliferate as traditional pensions fade: How to maximize your returns. Wall Street Journal (2006) January 7–8):B1Google Scholar
• Parikh M., Fazlollahi B., Verma S. The effectiveness of decisional guidance: An empirical evaluation. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(2):303–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prelec D., Lowenstein G. Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. (1991) 37(7):770–786Link, Google Scholar
• Schkade D. A., Kleinmuntz D. N. Information displays and choice processes: Differential effects of organization, form, and sequence. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1994) 57(3):319–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharpe W. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Finance (1964) 19(3):425–442Google Scholar
• Silver M. S. Descriptive analysis for computer-based decision support. Oper. Res. (1988) 36(6):904–916Link, Google Scholar
• Silver M. S. Decisional support systems: Directed and nondirected change. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(1):47–70Link, Google Scholar
• Silver M. S. Decisional guidance for computer-based decisional support. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):105–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundén A. E., Surette B. J. Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(2):207–211Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
• Thaler R. H., Tversky A., Kahneman D., Schwartz A. The effect of myopic loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(2):647–661Crossref, Google Scholar
• Todd P. A., Benbasat I. Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):356–374Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4):1124–1311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representations of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Bruggen G. H., Smidts A., Wierenga B. Improving decision making by means of a marketing decision support system. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):645–658Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatraman S., Aloysius J. A., Davis F. D. Multiple prospect framing and decision behavior: The meditational roles of perceived riskiness and perceived ambiguity. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2006) 101(1):59–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I. Cognitive fit: Theory-based analyses of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sci. (1991) 22(2):219–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):63–84Link, Google Scholar
• Wood R. Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1986) 37(1):60–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I. Receiving other people's advice: Influence and benefit. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2004) 93(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yaniv I., Kleinberger E. Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(2):260–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeates K. O., Taylor H. G., Wade S. L., Drotar D., Stancin T., Minich N. A prospective study of short- and long-term neuropsychological outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology (2002) 16(4):514–523Crossref, Google Scholar