Inference from Streaks in Random Outcomes: Experimental Evidence on Beliefs in Regime Shifting and the Law of Small Numbers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1059

References

  • Barberis N., Shleifer A., Vishny R. A model of investor sentiment. J. Financial Econom. (1998) 49(3):307–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bar-Hillel M., Wagenaar W. A. Perception of randomness. Adv. Appl. Math. (1991) 12(4):428–454CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloomfield R., Hales J. Predicting the next step of a random walk: Experimental evidence of regime-shifting beliefs. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 65(3):397–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brav A., Heaton J. B. Competing theories of financial anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15(2):575–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruine de Bruin W., Fischbeck P. S., Stilber N. A., Fischhoff B. What number is “fifty-fifty”?: Redistributing excessive 50% responses in elicited probabilities. Risk Analysis (2002) 22(4):713–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burns B. D., Corpus B. Randomness and induction from streaks: “Gambler's fallacy” versus “hot hand”. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (2004) 11(1):179–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clotfelter C. T., Cook P. J. The “gambler's fallacy” in lottery play. Management Sci. (1993) 39(12):1521–1525LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R., Sundali J. The gambler's fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from casinos. J. Risk Uncertainty (2005) 30(3):195–209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Durham G., Hertzel M., Martin S. The market impact of trends and sequences in performance: New evidence. J. Finance (2005) 60(5):2551–2569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fox C. R., Rottenstreich Y. Partition priming in judgement under uncertainty. Psych. Sci. (2003) 14(3):195–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massey C., Wu G. Detecting regime shifts: The causes of under- and overreaction. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):932–947LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mullainathan S. Thinking through categories. (2002) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Offerman T., Sonnemans J. Is the quadratic scoring rule really incentive compatible? (2001) . Working paper, University of Amsterdam, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  • Offerman T., Sonnemans J. What's causing overreaction? An experimental investigation of recency and the hot-hand effect. Scandinavian J. Econom. (2004) 106(3):533–554CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin M. Inference by believers in the law of small numbers. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(3):775–816CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rabin M., Vayanos D. The gambler's and hot-hand fallacies: Theory and applications. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A., Budescu D. V. Generation of random series in two-person strictly competitive games. J. Experiment. Psych. General (1992) 121(3):352–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terrell D. A test of gambler's fallacy—Evidence from para-mutuel games. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 8(3):603–617CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psych. Bull. (1971) 76(2):105–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.