Swift and Smart: The Moderating Effects of Technological Capabilities on the Market Pioneering–Firm Survival Relationship

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1061

References

  • Abernathy W., Utterback . Patterns of industrial innovation. Tech. Rev. (1978) 80:97–107Google Scholar
  • Adegbesamn T., Ricart J. E. What do we really know about when technological innovation improves performance (and when it does not)? (2007) . Working paper, University of Navarra, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  • Adner R. When are technologies disruptive? A demand-based view of the emergence of competition. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):667–688CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R. Evolutionary trends of industry variables. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1998) 16(4):511–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Gort M. First mover advantage and the speed of competitive entry: 1887–1988. J. Law Econom. (2001) 44:161–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Helfat C. E. Strategic renewal of organizations. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(2):281–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G., Lampert C. M. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):521–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D.Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide (1995) (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) Google Scholar
  • Andrew J. P., Sirkin H. L. Innovating for cash. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(9):76–83Google Scholar
  • Barnett W. P., McKendrick D. Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(4):535–571Google Scholar
  • Bayus B. L. Speed-to-market and new product performance trade-offs. J. Product Innovation Management (1997) 14:485–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bierly P., Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:123–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W., Christen M. Sustainable pioneering advantage profit implications of the entry timing decisions. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):371–392LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burgelman R. A. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(3):239–262LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Capon N., Farley J. H., Hoenig S. Determinants of financial performance: A meta-analysis. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1143–1159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. The rigid disk drive industry: A history of commercial and technological turbulence. Bus. History Rev. (1993) 67:531–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christensen C. M.The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (1997a) (Harvard University Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Christensen C. M. Patterns in the evolution of product competition. Eur. Management J. (1997b) 15(2):117–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T.-H. New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):173–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) 2nd ed.(Blackwell, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
  • Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(12):1095–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danneels E. The process of technological competence leveraging. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(5):511–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):37–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • de Figueiredo J. M., Silverman B. S. Churn, baby, churn: Strategic dynamics among dominant and fringe firms in a segmented industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(4):632–650LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dierickx I., Cool K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1989) 35(12):1504–1511LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dorroh J. R., Gulledge T. R., Womer N. K. Investment in knowledge: A generalization of learning by experience. Management Sci. (1994) 40(8):947–958LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finkelstein S. First-mover advantage for Internet startups: Myth or reality? Handbook of Business Strategy (2002) (Ed Media Group, New York) 39–46Google Scholar
  • Floyd S. W., Lane P. J. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(1):154–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster M. J. The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: A comment. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(2):179–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gans J., Stern S. The product market and the market for ideas. Res. Policy (2003) 32(2):333–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gambardella A., Torrisi S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Res. Policy (1998) 27(5):445–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson C., Birkinshaw J. M. Contextual determinants of organisational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(2):209–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golder P. N., Tellis G. J. Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend? J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30:158–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gort M., Klepper S. Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations. Econom. J. (1982) 92:630–653Google Scholar
  • Granger C. W. J. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica (1969) 37(3):424–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granger C. W. J. Some aspects of causal relationships. J. Econometrics (2003) 112(1):69–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granstrand O., Patel P., Pavitt K. Multi-technology corporations: Why they have ‘distributed’ rather than ‘distinctive core’ competences. Calif. Management Rev. (1997) 39(4):8–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. Calif. Management Rev. (1991) 33(3):114–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13:191–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch N. W., Macher J. T. Mitigating the tradeoff between time-to-market and manufacturing performance: Knowledge management in new technologies. (2002) . Working paper, Brigham Young University, Provo, UTGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Helfat C. E., Finkelstein S., Mitchell W., Peteraf M., Singh H., Teece D., Winter S. Dynamic capabilities: Foundation. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations (2007) (Blackwell, Malden, MA) 1–18Google Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Eisenhardt K. M. Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(13):1217–1232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Helfat C. E., Lieberman M. B. The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(4):725–760CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Ireland R. D., Camp S. M., Sexton D. L. Guest editors' introduction to the special issue—Strategic entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):479–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(4):331–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huff J. O., Huff A. S., Thomas H. Strategic renewal and the interaction of cumulative stress and inertia. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(S1):55–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz R., Allen T. J. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(1):67–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S. The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the U.S. automobile industry. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(2):645–666CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Simons K. L. The making of an oligopoly: Firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the U.S. tire industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 18(4):728–760Google Scholar
  • Lee G. Relevance of organizational capabilities and its dynamics: What to learn from entrants' product portfolios about the determinants of entry timing. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(12):1257–1280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiponen A. Competencies, innovation, and profitability of firms. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2000) 9(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J. An empirical exploration of a technology race. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(2):228–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(S2):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. The learning curve, technology barriers to entry, and competitive survival in the chemical processing industries. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(5):431–447CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(S1):41–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B., Montgomery D. B. First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(12):1111–1125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Yoon E. The timing of competitive market entry: An exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Sci. (1990) 36(5):568–585LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Linder J. C., Jarvenpaa S., Davenport T. H. Toward an innovation sourcing strategy. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 44(4):43–49Google Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., Rumelt R. P. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences under competition. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:418–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Chen M. Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(1):1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W. Whether and when: Probability and timing of incumbents entry into emerging industrial subfields. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(2):208–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell W. Dual clocks: Entry order influences on incumbent and newcomer market share and survival when specialized assets retain their value. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(2):85–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moran P., Ghoshal S. Markets, firms, and the process of economic development. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):390–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park C. W., Zaltman G.Marketing Management (1987) (Dryden Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Reed R., DeFillippi R. J. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):88–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson W., Min S. Is the first to market the first to fail? Empirical evidence for industrial goods businesses. J. Marketing (2002) 29:120–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson W. T., Fornell C., Sullivan M. Are market pioneers intrinsically stronger than later entrants? Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(8):609–624CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbloom R. S., Cusumano M. A. Technological pioneering and competitive advantage: The birth of the VCR industry. Calif. Management Rev. (1987) 29(4):51–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelt R. P., Teece D. The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal. Theory, Strategy, and Entrepreneurship (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 137–158Google Scholar
  • Schoonhoven C. B., Eisenhardt K. M., Lyman K. Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:177–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942) (Harper and Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Shankar V., Carpenter G. S., Krishnamurthi L. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35:54–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stieglitz N., Heine K. Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(1):1–15CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suarez F., Lanzolla G. The role of environmental dynamics in building a theory of first-mover advantages. Acad. Management Rev. (2007) 32(2):377–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. A behavioral analysis of OPEC: An economic and political synthesis. J. Bus. Admin. (1982) 13(1/2):127–159Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15:285–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tegarden L. F., Hatfield D. E., Echols A. E. Doomed from the start: What is the value of selecting a future dominant design? Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(6):495–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S., Kuemmerle W. Asset accumulation, interdependence, and technological change: Evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(7):619–635CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Res. Organ. Behav. (1985) 7:171–222Google Scholar
  • Tushman M., Anderson P., O'Reilly C., Tushman M., Anderson P. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations: Organizational renewal through innovation streams and strategic change. Managing Strategic Innovation and Change (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–23Google Scholar
  • VanderWerf P. A., Mahon J. F. Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of first-mover advantages. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1510–1519LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walker O. C., Ruekert R. W. Marketing's role in the implementation of business strategies: A critical review and conceptual framework. J. Marketing (1987) 51(3):15–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5(2):171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.