Implications of Expected Changes in the Seller's Price in Name-Your-Own-Price Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1064

References

  • Almadoss W., Jain S. Joint bidding in the name-your-own-price channel: A strategic analysis. Management Sci. (2008) 54(10):1685–1699LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C. K., Wilson J. G. Wait or buy? The strategic consumer: Pricing and profit implications. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (2003) 54(3):299–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D., Ockenfels A., Roth A. E. An experimental analysis of ending rules in Internet auctions. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(4):890–907Google Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Yiwei J. User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A. Reverse pricing and online price elicitation strategies in consumer choice. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1/2):51–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A. Articulation compatibility in eliciting price bids. J. Consumer Res. (2006) 33(3):329–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ding M., Eliashberg J., Huber J., Saini R. Emotional bidders—An analytical and experimental examination of consumers' behavior in a Priceline-like reverse auction. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan R. J. Priceline.com: Name your own price. (2001) . HBS Teaching Note 5-501-046, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan R. J., Moon Y. Pricing and market making on the Internet. (2000) . HBS Study 9-500-065, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle J. Cybra's MarkMagic gets sm@rt. Midrange Systems (2000) 13(April 10):23–24Google Scholar
  • Elkind P. The hype is big, really big, at Priceline. Fortune (1999) 140(5):193–202Google Scholar
  • Fay S. Partial-repeat-bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):407–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Feng J. Research note—Optimal mechanism for selling a set of commonly ranked objects. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):501–512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hann I.-H., Terwiesch C. Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: The case of a name-your-own-price channel. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1563–1579LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kanna P. K., Kopalle P. K. Dynamic pricing on the Internet: Importance and implications for consumer behavior. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 5(3):63–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kopalle P., Lehmann D. Setting quality expectations when entering a market: What should the promise be? Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):9–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna A. The normative impact of consumer price expectations for multiple brands on consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(3):266–286LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna A. The impact of dealing patterns on purchase behavior. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(4):351–373LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna A., Unver M. U. Improving the efficiency of course bidding at business schools: Field and laboratory studies. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(2):262–282LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leocha C. 3 steps to a low fare. (2005) . http://www.consumertraveler.com/columns/3-steps-to-a-low-fare/Google Scholar
  • Nair H. Intertemporal price discrimination with forward-looking consumers: Applications to the U.S. market for console video-games. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2007) 5(3):239–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park Y.-H., Bradlow E. An integrated model for bidding behavior in Internet auctions: Whether, who, when, and how much. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(4):470–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Power C. Priceline's financial services bid. Amer. Banker (2000) 165(207, October 27):1–2Google Scholar
  • Segan S.Priceline.com for Dummies (2005) (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sinha A., Greenleaf E. The impact of discrete bidding and bidder aggressiveness on sellers' strategies in open English auctions: Reserves and covert shilling. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(3):244–265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spann M., Tellis G. J. Does the Internet promote better consumer decisions? The case of name-your-own-price auctions. J. Marketing (2006) 70(January):65–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spann M., Skiera B., Schafers B. Measuring individual frictional costs and willingness-to-pay via name-your-own-price mechanisms. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(4):22–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Savin S., Hann I.-H. Online haggling at a name-your-own-price retailer: Theory and application. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R. Forward-looking bidding in online auctions. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):462–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zeithammer R. Strategic bid-shading and sequential auctioning with learning from past prices. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1510–1519LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.