Valuing Modularity as a Real Option

References

• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B., Braha S. D., Minai A. A., Bar-Yam Y. Modularity in the design of complex engineering system. Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology (2006) (Springer, New York) 175–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi A., Rossetto S. On the economic value of modularity in software development: A real options approach. Internat. J. Appl. Software Technologies (1998) FallGoogle Scholar
• Boyle P. P., Evnine J., Gibbs S. Numerical evaluation of multivariate contingent claims. Rev. Financial Stud. (1989) 2:241–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breen R. The accelerated binomial option pricing model. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1991) 26(2):153–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Broadie M., Detemple J. American option valuation: New bounds, approximations, and a comparison of existing methods. Rev. Financial Stud. (1996) 9(4):1211–1250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cai Y., Huynh S., Xie T. A framework and tool supports for testing modularity of software design. Proc. 22nd IEEE/ACM Internat. Conf. Automated Software Engrg. (2007) (ACM, New York) 441–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr P. The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities. J. Finance (1988) 43(5):1235–1256Crossref, Google Scholar
• Copeland T. E., Weston J. F., Shastri K.Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (2005) 4th ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Cox J., Ross A., Rubinstein M. Option pricing: A simplified approach. J. Financial Econom. (1979) 7:229–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dixit A., Pindyck R.Investment Under Uncertainty (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger S. Model-based approaches to managing concurrent engineering. J. Engrg. Design (1991) 2(4):283–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eppinger S., Whitney D., Smith R., Gebala D. A model-based method for organizing task in product development. Res. Engrg. Design (1994) 6(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fried I. Will iTunes make Apple shine? CNET News (2003) October 16). http://news.cnet.com/Google Scholar
• Gamba A. Real option valuation: A Monte Carlo approach. (2002) . Working paper, School of Management, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Gamba A., Tesser M. Structural estimation of real options models. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2009) 33(4):798–816Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamba A., Trigeorgis L. An improved binomial lattice method for multi-dimensional options. Appl. Math. Finance (2007) 14(5):453–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gamba A., Sick G. A., Leon C. A. Investment under uncertainty, debt and taxes. Econom. Notes (2008) 37(1):31–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geske R. The valuation of corporate liabiliies as compound options. J. Finance Quant. Anal. (1977) 12(4):541–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geske R. The valuation of compound options. J. Financial Econom. (1979) 7:63–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geske R., Johnson H. E. The American put option valued analytically. J. Finance (1984) 39(5):1511–1524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glasserman P.Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (2004) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gollier C., Prould D., Thais F., Walgenwitz G. Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: Valuing modularity. Energy Econom. (2005) 27(4):667–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judd K. L.Numerical Methods in Economics (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Kemna A. G. Z. Case studies on real options. Financial Management (1993) 22(3):259–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kloeden P. E., Platen E.Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations (1999) 3rd ed.(Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Kulatilaka N. Capabilities as real options. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(6):744–758Link, Google Scholar
• Longstaff F. A., Schwartz E. S. Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(1):113–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martzoukos S. H., Trigeorgis L. Real (investment) options with multiple sources of rare events. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 136:696–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno M., Navas J. F. On the robustness of least-squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for pricing American derivatives. Rev. Derivative Res. (2003) 6(2):107–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rodrigues A., Armada M. J. R. The valuation of modular projects: A real options approach to the value of splitting. Global Finance J. (2007) 18(2):205–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rudholm N. Mergers and economies of scale: Volkswagen AG 1976–2000. ICFAI J. Mergers Acquisitions (2007) 4(3):79–90Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Indust. Management Rev. (1965) 6(2):41–49Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. A. Proof that properly discounted present values of assets vibrate randomly. Bell J. Econom. Management Sci. (1973) 4(2):369–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stentoft L. Convergence of the least squares Monte Carlo approach to American option valuation. Management Sci. (2004) 50(9):1193–1203Link, Google Scholar
• Steward D. V. The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1981a) 28(3):71–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steward D. V.System Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design (1981b) (Petrocelli Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Sullivan W., Griswold W. G., Cai Y., Hallen B. The structure and value of modularity in software design. Proc. 8th European Software Engrg. Conf. (2001) (AMC, New York) 99–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis L. The nature of option interactions and the valuation of investments with multiple real options. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1993) 28(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trigeorgis L.Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation (1996) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar