The Silver Lining Effect: Formal Analysis and Experiments
Published Online:28 Sep 2009https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1076
References
- Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Sci. (2007) 53(10):1659–1674Link, Google Scholar
- Three cheers—psychological, theoretical, empirical—for loss aversion. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(2):129–133Crossref, Google Scholar
- Individual-level loss aversion in riskless and risky choices. (2007) . IZA Discussion Paper 2961, School of Economics, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
- Bayesian Data Analysis (1995) (Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Loss aversion and labor supply. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2(2–3):216–228Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
- Choices, Values and Frames (2000) (Russel Sage Foundation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Preferences for separating or combining events. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 60(1):5–23Crossref, Google Scholar
- Choice bracketing. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):171–97Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bayesian statistics and marketing. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):304–328Link, Google Scholar
- From Shakespeare to Simon: Speculation—and some evidence—about man's ability to process information. Oregon Res. Inst. Bull. (1972) 12(3):1–29Google Scholar
- Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):199–214Link, Google Scholar
- Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660Link, Google Scholar
- The neural basis of loss aversion in decision making under risk. Science (2007) 315(5811):515–518Crossref, Google Scholar
- Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
- An empirical test of gain-loss separability in prospect theory. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1322–1335Link, Google Scholar

