Total-Cost Procurement Auctions: Impact of Suppliers' Cost Adjustments on Auction Format Choice

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1086

References

  • Barlow R. E., Proschan F.Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing (1975) (Holt, New York) Google Scholar
  • Beall S., Carter C., Carter P. L., Germer T., Hendrick T., Jap S. D., Kaufmann L., Maciejewski D., Monczka R., Petersen K. The role of reverse auctions in strategic sourcing. (2003) . Report, Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  • Beil D. R., Wein L. M. An inverse-optimization-based auction mechanism to support a multiattribute RFQ process. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1529–1545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D., Pesendorfer M. Information structures in optimal auctions. J. Econom. Theory (2007) 137:580–609CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco F. The design of multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28:63–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G., Zhang F. Procuring fast delivery: Sole sourcing with information asymmetry. Management Sci. (2006) 52:881–896LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research 2006 eProcurement Benchmark Report. (2006) (Center for Advanced Procurement Studies Research, Tempe, AZ) Google Scholar
  • Che Y.-K. Design competition through multidimensional auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1993) 24:668–680CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Auctioning supply contracts. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1562–1576LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen R. R., Roundy R. O., Zhang R. Q., Janakiraman G. Efficient auction mechanisms for supply chain procurement. Management Sci. (2005) 51:467–482LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S., Spulber D. F. Managing procurement auctions. Inform. Econom. Policy (1989/1990) 4:5–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellram L. M. Total cost modeling in purchasing. (1994) . Report, Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Tempe, AZGoogle Scholar
  • Elmaghraby W. J. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2:350–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Haruvy E., Katok E. A comparison of buyer-determined and price-based multiattribute mechanisms. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26:629–641LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eso P., Szentes B. Optimal information disclosure in auctions and the handicap auction. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2007) 74:705–731CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ghawi D., Schneider G. P. New approaches to online procurement. Proc. Acad. Inform. Management Sci. (2004) 8(2):25–28Google Scholar
  • International Chamber of CommerceIncoterms 2000: ICC Official Rules for the Interpretation of Trade Terms (1999) (ICC Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67:96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71:146–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press)Google Scholar
  • Kulp S. L., Randall T. Procurement at Betapharm Corp. (A). (2005) . HBS Case 9-105-30, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E., Riley J. Asymmetric auctions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67:413–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E., Tirole J. The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal: The case of private values. Econometrica (1990) 58:379–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maskin E., Tirole J. The principal-agent relationship with an informed principal, II: Common values. Econometrica (1992) 60:1–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller A., Stoyan D.Comparison Methods for Stochastic Models and Risks (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Optimal auction design. Math. Oper. Res. (1981) 6:58–73LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Myerson R. B. Mechanism design by an informed principal. Econometrica (1983) 51:1767–1798CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkes D., Kalagnanam J. Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions. Management Sci. (2005) 51:435–451LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pinker E. J., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49:1457–1484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rezende L. Biased procurement auctions. Econom. Theory (2009) 38:169–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Skreta V. On the informed seller problem: Optimal information disclosure. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Tan G. Optimal procurement mechanisms for an informed buyer. Canadian J. Econom. (1996) 29:699–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.