Managing Know-How

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1101

References

  • Adam K. Learning while searching for the best alternative. J. Econom. Theory (2001) 101(1):252–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adler P., Clark K. Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. (1991) 37(3):267–281LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aghion P., Bolton P., Harris C. Optimal learning by experimentation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58(4):621–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian A. Reliability of progress curves in air-frame production. Econometrica (1963) 31(4):679–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alonso R., Dessein W., Matouschek N. When does coordination require centralization? Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(1):145–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S., Levin J. The value of information in monotone decision problems. (2001) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A. McKinsey & Company: Managing knowledge and learning. (1996) . HBS Case 9-396-357, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Bartlett C. A., Kanter R. M., Kaplan R. S., Jensen M. C.Best Practice: Ideas and Insights from the World's Foremost Business Thinkers (2003) (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Berry D. E., Fristedt B.Bandit Problems: Sequential Allocation of Experiments (1985) (Chapman and Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blackwell D. Comparisons of experiments. Proc. Second Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. (1951) (University of California Press, Berkeley) 93–102Google Scholar
  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M. The firm as a communication network. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109(4):809–839CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockman B. K., Morgan R. M. The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 34(2):385–419Google Scholar
  • Canon M. D., Edmondson A. C. Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22(2):161–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll D. T. A disappointing search for excellence. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1983) 61(6):78–88Google Scholar
  • Christiansen C. M., Baird B. Cultivating capabilities to innovate: Booz-Allen & Hamilton. (1998) . HBS Case 9-698-027, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Chua A. Y. The curse of success: Knowledge-management projects often look good in the beginning; but then problems arise. Wall Street Journal (2007) April 28):R8Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity—A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conner K. R. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Management (1991) 17:121–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot M. H. Some problems of optimal stopping. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1968) 30(1):108–122Google Scholar
  • Denrell J. Selection bias and the perils of benchmarking. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2005) 83(4):114–119Google Scholar
  • Foss N. Knowledge-based approaches to the theory of the firm: Some critical comments. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):470–476LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garicano L. Hierarchies and the organization of knowledge in production. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108(5):874–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P. Building strategy on the experience curve. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(March):143–149Google Scholar
  • Gittins J. C.Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (1989) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hilton R. W. The determinants of information value: Synthesizing some general results. Management Sci. (1981) 27(1):57–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holsapple C. W.Handbook on Knowledge Management (2003) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(5):972–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B., Nyarko Y. Learning by doing and the choice of technology. Econometrica (1996) 64(6):1299–1310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoret. Biol. (1987) 128(1):11–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S., Lobo J., Macready W. G. Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43(2):141–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D.Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt B., March J. G. Organizational learning. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1988) 14:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A. Team New Zealand (a), (b), (c). (1997) . HBS Case 9-697-040, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • MacCormack A. Siemens sharenet: Building a knowledge network. (2002) . HBS Case 9-603-036, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Manso G. Motivating innovation. (2007) . AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings Paper, Hudson Institute Research Paper 08-01, http://ssrn.com/abstract=891514Google Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marschak J., Radner R.Economic Theory of Teams (1972) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
  • Miner A. S., Kim J. Y., Holzinger I. W., Haunschild P. Fruits of failure: Organizational failure and population-level learning. Adv. Strategic Management (1999) 16:187–220Google Scholar
  • O'Dell C., Grayson C. J. If only we knew what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. Calif. Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):154–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M. A two-armed bandit theory of market pricing. J. Econom. Theory (1974) 9:185–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Senge P. M.The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (1990) (Currency Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. A. Temporarily divide and conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B. Learning through failure: The strategy of small loses. Res. Organ. Behav. (1992) 14:231–266Google Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):446–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stern S.Biological Resource Centers: Knowledge Hubs for the Life Sciences (2004) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Stewart T. A. Knowledge worth $1.25 billion. Fortune (2000) 142(13):302–303Google Scholar
  • Thompson W. R. On the likelihood that one unknown probability exceeds another in view of the evidence of two samples. Biometrika (1933) 25:275–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E. Organizational beliefs and managerial vision. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2005) 21(1):256–283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Zandt T. Real-time decentralized information processing as a model of organizations with boundedly rational agents. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(3):633–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica (1979) 47(3):641–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.