Perturbation of Numerical Confidential Data via Skew-t Distributions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1104

References

  • Arellano-Valle R. B., Azzalini A. On the unification of families of skew-normal distributions. Scand. J. Statist. (2006) 33(3):561–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano-Valle R. B., Bolfarine H. On some characterizations of the t distribution. Statist. Probab. Lett. (1995) 25(1):79–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano-Valle R. B., Genton M. G. Multivariate extended skew-t distributions and related families. Metron (2010) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano-Valle R. B., Branco M. D., Genton M. G. A unified view on skewed distributions arising from selections. Canad. J. Statist. (2006) 34(4):581–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzalini A. The skew-normal distribution and related multivariate families (with discussion by Marc G. Genton and a rejoinder by the author). Scand. J. Statist. (2005) 32(2):159–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzalini A., Capitanio A. Statistical applications of the multivariate skew-normal distribution. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (1999) 61(4):579–602CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzalini A., Capitanio A. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis on an multivariate skew t distribution. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (2003) 65(2):367–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azzalini A., Genton M. G. Robust likelihood methods based on the skew-t and related distributions. Internat. Statist. Rev. (2008) 76(1):106–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barak B., Chaudhuri K., Dwork C., Kale S., McSherry F., Talwar K. Privacy, accuracy, and consistency too: A holistic solution to contingency table release. Proc. Twenty-Sixth ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Sympos. on Principals of Database Systems (2007) (ACM, New York) 273–281CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco M. D., Dey D. K. A general class of multivariate skew-elliptical distributions. J. Multivariate Anal. (2001) 79(1):99–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Branco M. D., Dey D. K. Regression model under skew elliptical error distribution. J. Math. Sci. (2002) 1:151–169Google Scholar
  • Burridge J. Information preserving statistical obfuscation. Stat. Comp. (2003) 13(4):321–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemen R. T., Reilly T. Correlation and copulas for decision and risk analysis. Management Sci. (1999) 45(2):208–224LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Domingo-Ferrer J., Jonker W., Petković M. A three-dimensional conceptual framework for database privacy. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2007) 4721(Springer, Berlin) 193–202Google Scholar
  • Fang K.-T., Kotz S., Ng K. W.Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions (1990) (Chapman and Hall, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Field C., Genton M. G. The multivariate bg-and-bh distribution. Technometrics (2006) 48(1):104–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Genton M. G.Skew-Elliptical Distributions and Their Applications: A Journey Beyond Normality, edited volume (2004) (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Healy M. J. R. Multivariate normal plotting. Appl. Statist. (1968) 17(2):157–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones D. Y., Schatzkin A., Green S. B., Block G., Brinton L. A., Ziegler R. G., Hoover R., Taylor P. R. Dietary fat and breast cancer in the National Health and Nutrition Survey I: Epidemiologic follow-up study. J. National Cancer Inst. (1987) 79(3):465–471Google Scholar
  • Ma Y., Genton M. G. A flexible class of skew-symmetric distributions. Scand. J. Statist. (2004) 31(3):459–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machanavajjhala A., Kifer D., Gehrke J., Venkitasubramaniam M. l-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery from Data (2007) 1(1):1–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marchenko Y. V., Genton M. G. Multivariate log-skew-elliptical distributions with applications to precipitation data. Environmetrics (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Mardia K. V., Kent J. T., Bibby J. M.Multivariate Analysis (1979) (Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Sarathy R. A theoretical basis for perturbation methods. Stat. Comput. (2003) 13(4):329–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Sarathy R. Data shuffling—A new masking approach for numerical data. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):658–670LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Sarathy R. Generating sufficiency-based nonsynthetic perturbed data. Trans. Data Privacy (2008) 1(1):17–33Google Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Batra D., Kirs P. J. Accessibility, security, and accuracy in statistical databases: The case for the multiplicative fixed data perturbation approach. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1549–1564LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Parsa R., Sarathy R. A general additive data perturbation method for database security. Management Sci. (1999) 45(10):1399–1415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Sarathy R., Parsa R. An improved security requirement for data perturbation with implications for e-commerce. Decision Sci. (2001) 32(4):683–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • R Development Core Team (2008) . R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Raghunathan T. E., Reiter J. P., Rubin D. B. Multiple imputation for statistical disclosure limitation. J. Official Statist. (2003) 19(1):1–16Google Scholar
  • Reiter J. P. Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Survey Methodology (2003) 29(2):181–188Google Scholar
  • Rubin D. B. Discussion: Statistical disclosure limitation. J. Official Statist. (1993) 9(2):461–468Google Scholar
  • Sarathy R., Muralidhar K., Parsa R. Perturbing nonnormal confidential attributes: The copula approach. Management Sci. (2002) 48(12):1613–1627LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.