Securing the Containerized Supply Chain: Analysis of Government Incentives for Private Investment

References

• Abt C. C. The economic impact of nuclear terrorist attacks on freight transport systems in an age of seaport vulnerability. (2003) . Report, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Abt C. C., Rhodes W., Casagrande R., Gaumer G. The economic impacts of bioterrorist attacks on freight transport systems in an age of seaport vulnerability. (2003) . Report, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Afèche P. Incentive-compatible revenue management in queueing systems: Optimal strategic delay and other delay tactics. (2006) . Working paper, Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, TorontoGoogle Scholar
• Altman E., Boulogne T., El-Alzouzi R., Jimenez T., Wynter L. A survey of networking games in telecommunications. Comput. Oper. Res. (2006) 33(2):286–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bakshi N., Flynn S. E., Gans N. Estimating the operational impact of container inspections at international ports. (2009) . Working paper, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Basham W. R. Remarks by CBP Commissioner W. Ralph Basham on Container Security at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2007) . http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/newsroom/commissioner/speeches_statements/commish_remarks_csc.xmlGoogle Scholar
• Bettge J. Private conversation with the authors, November 3. (2006) . Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Boske L. B. Port and supply chain security initiatives in the United States and abroad. (2006) . Report, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, The University of Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
• C-TPAT Strategic Plan (2004) . Securing the global supply chain: Customs-trade partnership against terrorism. http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/cargo_security/ctpat/what_ctpat/ctpat_strategicplan.ctt/ctpat_strategicplan.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Diop A. D., Hartman D., Rexrode D. C-TPAT: Cost/benefit survey. (2007) . Report, Center for Survey Research, Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, University of VirginiaGoogle Scholar
• Downey L. International cargo conundrum: How much investment in security is enough? RFID J. (2006) Feburary 6Google Scholar
• Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Lett. (2006) 27(8):861–874Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerencser M., Weinberg J., Vincent D. Port security war game: Implications for U.S. supply chains. (2003) . Report, Booz Allen Hamilton, McLean, VAGoogle Scholar
• Ghylin K. M., Drury C. G., Schwaninger A. Two-component model of security inspection: Application and findings. (2006) 16th World Congress of Ergonomics(IEA, Maastricht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Graham B., Talent J., Allison G., Cleveland R., Rademaker S., Roemer T., Sherman W., Sokolski H., Verma R. World at risk. (2008) . Report of the Commission on the Prevention of WMD Proliferation and Terrorism. http://www.preventwmd.gov/report/Google Scholar
• Greenberg M. D., Chalk P., Willis H. H., Khilko I., Ortiz D. S. Maritime terrorism, risk and liability. (2006) . Report, RAND Center for Terrorism Risk Management Policy, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
• Hopp W. J., Yuen G., Iravani S. M. R. Operation systems with discretionary task completion. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):61–77Link, Google Scholar
• Huizenga D. Detecting nuclear weapons and radiological materials: How effective is available technology? Testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security. http://ftp.resource.org/gpo.gov/hearings/110h/25356.pdf. (2005) Google Scholar
• Keane A. G. Where's the incentive? Traffic World (2005) April 11):12Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer P. R., Saad G. H. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(1):53–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kollerstrom J. Heavy traffic theory for queues with several servers I. J. Appl. Probab. (1974) 11(3):544–552Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H. C., McNulty P. J., Kang Y. Third-party inspection as an alternative command and control regulation. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(2):309–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kurtz H. ABC ships uranium overseas for story. Washington Post (2003) September 11):A21Google Scholar
• Laffont J. J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives, the Principal-Agent Model (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Whang S. Higher supply chain security with lower cost: Lessons from total quality management. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2005) 96(3):289–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lugar R. G. The lugar survey on proliferation threats and responses. (2005) . Report by the Chairman, Senate Foreign Relations Committee. http://lugar.senate.gov/reports/NPSurvey.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Marine Link The 5% myth. (2004) . Accessed August 29, 2008, http://www.marinelink.com/Story/The+5%25+Myth-15423.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Marshall A. W., Olkin I. A general approach to some screening and classification problems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B (Methodological) (1968) 30(3):407–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martonosi S. E., Barnett A. How effective is security screening of airline passengers? Interfaces (2006) 36(6):545–552Link, Google Scholar
• Martonosi S. E., Ortiz D. S., Willis H. H. Evaluating the viability of 100 percent container inspection at America's ports. (2006) . Report, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
• McClelland J. L. On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in Cascade. Psycho. Rev. (1979) 86(4):287–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• McClure G. How safe are our ports? (2007) . Accessed August 14, 2008, http://www.todaysengineer.org/2007/Sep/port-security.aspGoogle Scholar
• Pinker E. J. An analysis of short-term responses to threats of terrorism. Management Sci. (2007) 53(6):865–880Link, Google Scholar
• SAFE Port Act (2006) . HR 4954, 109th Congress http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.4954:Google Scholar
• SENTRI Secure electronic network for travelers rapid inspection. (2006) . U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Shaked M., Shanthikumar G. J.Stochastic Orders and Their Applications (1994) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Sheffi Y.The Resilient Enterprise (2005) (MIT press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Shumsky R. A., Pinker E. J. Gatekeepers and referrals in services. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):839–856Link, Google Scholar
• Spencer C. (2004) . International supply chain security regulatory programs presented at McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, October 16, 2003, IMS Worldwide. http://mba.mccombs.utexas.edu/plus/Academies/BAB/CurtisSpencer.pptGoogle Scholar
• Steenken D., Voss S., Stahlbock R. Container terminal operation and operations research—A classification and literature review. OR Spectrum (2004) 26(1):3–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tomlin B. On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):639–657Link, Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Summary of challenges faced in targeting oceangoing cargo containers for inspection. (2004) . Report GAO-04-557T. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Homeland security: Key cargo security programs can be improved. (2005) . Report GAO-05-466T. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Border security: Investigators transported radioactive sources across our nation's borders at two locations. (2006a) . Report GAO-06-583T. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Cargo container inspections: Preliminary observations on the status to efforts to improve the automated targeting system. (2006b) . Report GAO-06-591T. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Maritime security: Observations on selected aspects of the SAFE port act. (2007) . Report GAO-07-754T. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Supply chain security: U.S. customs and border protection has enhanced its partnership with import trade sectors, but challenges remain in verifying security practices. (2008) . Report GAO-08-240. GAO, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• USA Today Most fake bombs missed by screeners. (2007) October 17). http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-10-17-airport-security_N.htmGoogle Scholar
• Wasem R. E., Lake J., Seghetti L., Monke J., Vina S. Border security: Inspection practices, policies, and Provide URL? issues. (2004) . Congressional Research Service Report. The Library of Congress, http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/33856.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Wein L. M., Liu Y., Cao Z., Flynn S. E. The optimal spatiotemporal deployment of radiation portal monitors can improve nuclear detection at overseas ports. Sci. Global Security (2007) 15(3):211–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wein L. M., Wilkins A. H., Baveja M., Flynn S. E. Preventing the importation of illicit nuclear materials in shipping containers. Risk Anal. (2006) 26(5):1377–1393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wolff R. W.Stochastic Modeling and the Theory of Queues (1989) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar