Navel Gazing: Academic Inbreeding and Scientific Productivity

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1109

References

  • Acs Z. J., Audretsch D. B., Feldman M. P. Real effects of academic research: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82(1):363–367Google Scholar
  • Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy (2005) 34(3):259–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berelson B.Graduate Education in the United States (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bleiklie I., Hostaker R. Modernizing research training-education and science policy between profession, discipline and academic institution. Higher Ed. Policy (2004) 17(2):221–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burris V. The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2004) 69(2):239–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calhoun C., Meyer M. W., Scott W. R.Structures of Power and Constraint: Papers in Honor of Peter M. Blau (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Camerer C., Vepsalainen A. The economic efficiency of corporate culture. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(S1):115–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caplow T., McGee R.The Academic Marketplace (1958) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crane D.Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities (1972) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Cummings W. K. The service university movement in the US: Searching for momentum. Higher Ed. (1998) 35:69–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eells W. C., Cleveland A. C. Faculty inbreeding. J. Higher Ed. (1999) 70(5):579–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenberg T., Wells M. T. Inbreeding in law school hiring: Assessing the performance of faculty hired from within. J. Legal Stud. (2000) 29(1):369–388CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliot C. W.University Administration (1908) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
  • European Commission White paper on education and training: Teaching and learning—Towards the learning society. (1995) . Accessed August 2007, http://europa.edu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com95_590_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:909–928CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frans A. J., Bosch V. d., Volberda H. W., Boer M. d. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):551–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Furman J. L., MacGarvie M. J. Academic science and the birth of industrial research laboratories in the US pharmaceutical industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):756–776CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galaz-Fuentes J. F., Gil-Antón M., Padilla-Gonzalez L. E., Sevilla-Garcia J. J., Arcos-Veja J. L., Martinez-Stack J. G. The academic profession in Mexico: Changes, continuities, and challenges derived from a comparison of two national surveys 15 years apart. (2009) Presentation, International Conference on The Changing Academic Profession over 1992–2007: International, Comparative and Quantitative PerspectivesJanuary 13–14Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima, JapanGoogle Scholar
  • Gonzalez-Brambila C., Veloso F. M. The determinants of research productivity: A study of Mexican researchers. Res. Policy (2007) 36(7):1035–1051CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grediaga R., Jiménez J. R. R., Padilla L. E.Políticas públicas y cambios en la profesión académica en México en la última décadaPublic policies and changes in the academic profession in Mexico during the last decade (2004) (Asociaón Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior [National Association of Universities and Higher Education Institutions], México) Google Scholar
  • Gruenfled D. H., Martorana P. V., Fan E. T. What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):45–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hagstrom W. O. Inputs, outputs and the prestige of university science departments. Sociol. Ed. (1971) 44(4):375–397CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handschin C. H. Inbreeding in the instructional corps of American colleges and universities. Science, New Ser. (1910) 32(829):707–709Google Scholar
  • Hargens L. L., Farr G. An examination of recent hypotheses about institutional inbreeding. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1381–1402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heitor M. V., Horta H., Heitor M., Brito J. M. B., Rollo M. F. Engenharia e desenvolvimento científico: O atraso estrutural português explicado no contexto histórico [Engineering and scientific development: The Portuguese structural backwardness explained within its historical context]. (2004) (D. Quixote, Alfragide, Portugal) Google Scholar
  • Henderson R., Jaffe A., Tratjenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1998) 80(1):119–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hollingshead A. B. Ingroup membership and academic selection. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1938) 3(6):826–833CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horta H. On improving the university research base: The Technical University of Lisbon case in perspective. Higher Ed. Policy (2008) 21(1):123–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):957–970Google Scholar
  • Johnsrud L. K. Cross-cultural implications of graduate study abroad: The case of Korean academics. Higher Ed. (1993) 25(2):207–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N., Cockburn I., Henderson R., Baum J. A., McGahan A. M. Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Business Strategy Over the Industry Life Cycle—Advances in Strategic Management (2004) 21(Elsevier, New York) 133–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeuw A. De, Volberda H. On the concept of flexibility: A dual control perspective. Internat. J. Management Sci. (1996) 24(2):121–139Google Scholar
  • Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(1):114–132Google Scholar
  • Lewison G. Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Res. Evaluation (2001) 10(2):89–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberson S., Gold D. Texas institutional inbreeding re-examined. Amer. J. Sociol. (1961) 66(5):506–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsh H. W., Hattie J. The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness; complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? J. Higher Ed. (2002) 73(5):603–641CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGee R. The function of institutional inbreeding. Amer. J. Sociol. (1960) 65(5):483–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McNeely J. H.Faculty Inbreeding in Land-Grant Colleges and Universities (1932) (Office of Education, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Navarro A., Rivero A. High rate of inbreeding in Spanish universities. Nature (2001) 410(6824):14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R.National Innovation System? A Comparative Analysis (1993) (Oxford University Press, NY) Google Scholar
  • North D. C.Institutions, Institutional Change & Economic Performance (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowotny H., Gibbons M., Scott P.Knowledge Production in an Age of Uncertainty (2001) (Polity Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M.Scientists in Organizations (1966) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Reeves F. W., Henry N. B., Kelly F. J., Klein A. J., Russell J. D.The University Faculty (1933) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santibañez L., Vernez G., Razquin P.Education in Mexico—Challenges and Opportunities (2005) (Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA) Google Scholar
  • Scott W. R.Institutions and Organizations (1995) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):756–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Smolentseva A. Challenges to the Russian academic profession. Higher Ed. (2003) 45(4):391–424CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soler M. How inbreeding affects productivity in Europe. Nature (2001) 411(6834):132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer J. W. How relevant is university-based scientific research to private high-technology firms? A United States–Japan comparison. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):432–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(S1):21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Velho L., Krige J. Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1984) 14(1):45–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2001) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wyer J. C., Conrad C. F. Institutional inbreeding reexamined. Amer. Educational Res. J. (1984) 21(1):213–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamanoi A. The academic marketplace in Japan: Inbreeding, grades and organization at research universities. Higher Ed. Forum (2005) 2:93–114Google Scholar
  • Yimin D., Lei X. Chinese universities—An end to business as usual? Science (2003) 302(5642):43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R. Movement of star scientists and engineers and high-tech firm entry. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12172, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.