Randomization vs. Selection: How to Choose in the Absence of Preference?

References

• Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(1):73–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Tom Sawyer and the construction of value. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2006) 60:1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aumann R. J. Utility theory without the completeness axiom. Econometrica (1962) 30(3):445–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baucells M., Shapley L. S. Multiperson utility. Games Econom. Behav. (2008) 62(2):329–347Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bewley T. F. Knightian decision theory: Part I. (1986) . Discussion Paper 807, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
• Bossert W., Sprumont Y., Suzumura K. Consistent rationalizability. Economica (2005) 72(286):185–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burros R. H. Axiomatic analysis of non-transitivity of preference and of indifference. Theory Decision (1974) 5(2):185–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chambers R. G. Uncertain equilibria and incomplete preferences. (2009) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
• Cubitt R. P., Sugden R. On money pumps. Games Econom. Behav. (2001) 37(1):121–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danan E. A behavioral model of individual welfare. (2003a) . Working paper, Université de Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Danan E. Revealed cognitive preference theory. (2003b) . Working paper, Université de Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne, ParisGoogle Scholar
• Danan E. Revealed preference and indifferent selection. Math. Soc. Sci. (2008) 55(1):24–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson D., McKinsey J. C. C., Suppes P. Outlines of a formal theory of value, I. Philosophy Sci. (1955) 22(2):140–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diecidue E. Deriving Harsanyi's utilitarianism from de Finetti's book-making argument. Theory Decision (2006) 61(4):363–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubra J., Ok E. A model of procedural decision making in the presence of risk. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2002) 43(4):1053–1080Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubra J., Maccheroni F., Ok E. A. Expected utility theory without the completeness axiom. J. Econom. Theory (2004) 115(1):118–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duggan J. A general extension theorem for binary relations. J. Econom. Theory (1999) 86(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eliaz K., Ok E. A. Indifference or indecisiveness? Choice-theoretic foundations of incomplete preferences. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 56(1):61–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evren O. Continuous representation of (indecisiveness-driven) preference for flexibility. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Evren O., Ok E. A. On the multi-utility representation of incomplete preference relations. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Gilboa I., Maccheroni F., Marinacci M., Schmeidler D. Objective and subjective rationality in a multiple prior model. Econometrica. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Gursel T. I. Revealed incomplete preferences under status-quo bias. Math. Soc. Sci. (2007) 53(3):274–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochov A. S. Subjective states without the completeness axiom. (2007) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYGoogle Scholar
• Lopomo G., Rigotti L., Shannon C. Uncertainty in mechanism design. (2008) . Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
• Maccheroni F. Yaari's dual theory without the completeness axiom. Econom. Theory (2004) 23(3):701–714Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandler M. Incomplete preferences and rational intransitivity of choice. Games Econom. Behav. (2005) 50(2):255–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mandler M. Indifference and incompleteness distinguished by rational trade. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 67(1):300–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manzini P., Mariotti M. How vague can one be? Rational preferences without completeness or transitivity. (2004) . Working paper, University of London, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Manzini P., Mariotti M. On the representation of incomplete preferences over risky alternatives. Theory Decision (2008) 65(4):303–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masatlioglu Y., Ok E. A. Rational choice with status quo bias. J. Econom. Theory (2005) 121(1):1–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nascimento L. On demand theory with incomplete preferences. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Nascimento L., Riella G. A class of incomplete and ambiguity averse preferences. (2009) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Ok E. A. Utility representation of an incomplete preference relation. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104(2):429–449Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ok E., Ortoleva P., Riella G. Incomplete preferences under uncertainty: Indecisiveness in beliefs vs. tastes. (2008) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Richter M. K., Chipman J. S., Hurwicz L., Richter M. K., Sonnenschein H. Rational choice. Preferences, Utility, and Demand (1971) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) 29–58Google Scholar
• Rigotti L., Shannon C. Uncertainty and risk in financial markets. Econometrica (2005) 73(1):203–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sen A. K. Choice functions and revealed preference. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1971) 38(3):307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suzumura K. Remarks on the theory of collective choice. Economica (1976) 43(172):381–390Crossref, Google Scholar