Prior Consequences and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1131

References

  • Ackert L., Charupat N., Church B., Deaves R. An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(1):5–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B., Odean T., Zhu N. Do retail trades move markets? Rev. Financial Stud. (2009a) 22(1):151–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber B., Odean T., Zhu N. Systematic noise. J. Financial Markets (2009b) 12(4):547–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N., Xiong W. What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance (2009) 64(2):751–784CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N., Xiong W. Realization utility. (2010) . Working paper, Yale University, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N., Huang M., Santos T. Prospect theory and asset prices. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):1–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barberis N., Huang M., Thaler R. Individual preferences, monetary gambles and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(4):1069–1090CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Battalio R. C., Kagel J. H., Jiranyakul K. Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results. J. Risk Uncertainty (1990) 3(1):25–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benartzi S., Thaler R. Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(1):73–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J., Ellison G. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. J. Political Econom. (1997) 105(6):1167–1200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook R. D., Weisberg S.Residuals and Influence in Regression (1983) (Chapman and Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Coval J. D., Shumway T. Do behavioral biases affect prices? J. Finance (2005) 60(1):1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daniel K., Hirshleifer D., Subrahmanyam A. Investor psychology and security market under- and over-reactions. J. Finance (1998) 53(6):1839–1885CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhar R., Zhu N. Up close and personal: An individual level analysis of the disposition effect. Management Sci. (2006) 52(5):726–740LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Genesove D., Mayer C. Nominal loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(4):1233–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gervais S., Odean T. Learning to be overconfident. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(1):1–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U., Kapteyn A., Potters J. Evaluation and asset prices in a market experiment. J. Finance (2003) 58(2):821–837CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haigh M., List J. Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? An experimental analysis. J. Finance (2005) 9(1):523–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C., Steven H., Mark L. Psychological factors and stock option exercise. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(2):601–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keasey K., Moon P. Gambling with the house money in capital expenditure decisions: An experimental analysis. Econom. Lett. (1996) 50(1):105–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y., Liu Y., Zhu N. The costs of owning employer stocks: Lessons from Taiwan. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2008) 43(3):717–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke P., Mann S. C. Prior outcomes and risky choices by professional traders. (2003) . Working paper, George Washington University, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Locke P., Mann S. C. Professional trader discipline and trade disposition. J. Financial Econom. (2005) 76(2):401–444CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Connell P., Teo M. Institutional investors, past performance, and dynamic loss aversion. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2009) 44(1):155–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Odean T. Do investors trade too much? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(5):1279–1298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seasholes M., Zhu N. Individual investors and local bias. J. Finance (2010) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shleifer A.Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioural Finance (2000) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Bus. Organ. (1980) 1(1):39–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R., Johnson E. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):643–660LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science (1981) 211(1):453–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M., Zuchel H. How do prior outcomes affect risk attitude? Comparing escalation of commitment and the house-money effect. Decision Anal. (2005) 2(1):30–43LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.