Markets for Inventors: Learning-by-Hiring as a Driver of Mobility

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1135

References

  • Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja G. When Atlas shrugged: Preemption, complexity and division of labor in a theory of appropriability. (2007) . Working paper, University of Michigan Business School, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P., Dokko G., Rosenkopf L. Start-up size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability? Res. Policy (2003) 32(2):301–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K., Nelson R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for innovation. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G.Human Capital (1964) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bessen J., Maskin E. Sequential innovation, patents and imitation. RAND J. Econom. (2009) 40(4):611–635CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll P.Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM (1994) (Crown Publishers, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external technology acquisition. Management Sci. (2006) 52(1):68–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst H., Vitt J. The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management (2000) 30(2):105–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fallick B., Fleischmann C. A., Rebitzer J. B. Job hopping in Silicon Valley: Some evidence concerning the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(3):472–481CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fosfuri A., Motta M., Ronde T. Foreign direct investment and spillovers through workers' mobility. J. Internat. Econom. (2001) 53(1):205–222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geuna A., Crespi G., Nesta L. Labour mobility of academic inventors. Career decision and knowledge transfer. (2006) . SPRU Working Paper 139, Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton, East Sussex, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Gilson R. J. The legal infrastructure of high technology industrial districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128 and covenants not to compete. New York Univ. Law Rev. (1999) 74(3):575–629Google Scholar
  • Giuri P., Mariani M. B., Crespi G., Francoz D., Gambardella A., Garcia-Fontes W., Geuna A., et al. Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Res. Policy (2007) 36(8):1107–1127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald B. C. Adverse selection in the labour market. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1986) 53(3):325–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. The NBER Patent Citations Data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. H., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(1):16–38Google Scholar
  • Harhoff D., Narin F., Scherer F., Vopel K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(3):511–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G. The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issues. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(4):331–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoetker G., Agarwal R. Death hurts, but it isn't fatal: The post-exit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Acad. Management J. (2007) 50(2):446–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoisl K. Tracing mobile inventors—The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Res. Policy (2007) 36(5):619–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopenhayn H., Mitchell M. Innovation variety and patent breadth. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(1):152–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Fogarty M. S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(2):215–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jenkins S. P. Survival analysis. (2005) . Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. Retrieved March 2, 2010, http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/files/teaching/stephenj/ec968/pdfs/ec968lnotesv6.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(5):972–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J., Marschke G. Labor mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(2):298–317Google Scholar
  • Klee M. The case of the omitted inventor. IEE Engrg. Medicine Biol. (1998) 17(3):110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lanjouw J. O., Schankerman M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Econom. J. (2004) 114(495):441–465Google Scholar
  • Levin R. C., Klevorick A. K., Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers on Econom. Activity (1987) 18(3):783–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis T. R., Yao D. Innovation, knowledge flow, and worker mobility. (2006) . Working paper. Retrieved March 2, 2010, http://www.people.hbs.edu/dyao/LewisYaoMobility.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Liebeskind J. P. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:93–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindholm-Dahlstrand A., Moncada-Paterno-Castello P., Tübke A., Migče R., Botella-Yaquero T. Entrepreneurial origin and spin-off performance: A comparison between corporate and university spin-offs. Corporate and Research-Based Spin-Offs: Drivers for Knowledge-Based Innovation and Entrepreneurship (2001) (Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, Spain) . European Commission Technical Report EUR-19903-ENGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Moen J. Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? J. Labor Econom. (2005) 23(1):81–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norton E. C., Wang H., Ai C. Computing interaction effects and standard errors in Logit and Probit models. Stata J. (2004) 4(2):154–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pakes A., Nitzan S. Optimum contracts for research personnel, research employment and the establishment of “rival” enterprises. J. Labor Econom. (1983) 1(4):345–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. Learning and experience in the labor market. J. Human Res. (1972) 7(3):326–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):751–766LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S. Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(9):1173–1190LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M. Job market signaling. Quart. J. Econom. (1973) 87(3):355–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T., Sorenson O. Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):175–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Topel R., Ward M. Job mobility and the careers of young men. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(2):439–479CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1990) 21(1):172–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M., Shiff G., Melamed R. The names game: Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12479, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Sci. (1986) 32(4):590–607LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge—Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar
  • Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (2007) 316(5827):1036–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ziedonis H. R., Cohen W. A., Merrill S. A. Patent litigation in the U.S. semiconductor industry. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (2003) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) 180–215Google Scholar
  • Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Torero M. Labor mobility from academe to commerce. J. Labor Econom. (2002) 20(3):629–660CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamaguchi K.Event History Analysis (1991) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.