Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1148

References

  • Allen T. J.Managing the Flow of Technology (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M. The firm as a communication network. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109(4):809–839CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bruderer E., Singh J. V. Organizational evolution, learning and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based Model. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1322–1349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R., Harrison J. R. On the historical efficiency of competition between organizational populations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1994) 100(3):720–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J. Organization structure, environment, and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology (1972) 6(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Child J.Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice (1984) 2nd ed.(Harper and Row, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cyert R. M., March J. G.A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (1963) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Doty D. H., Glick W. H., Huber G. P. Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(6):1196–1250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency- and institutional-theory explanations: The case of retail sales compensation. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(3):488–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ewens W.Mathematical Population Genetics (1979) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., Sorenson O. Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Res. Policy (2001) 30(7):1019–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G. Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities' development. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(6):599–617LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gresov C., Drazin R. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):403–428CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton D. P. Silicon Valley: Intel fights for a future in server chips. Wall Street Journal (2001) (Europe edition)(May 29):1, 9Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R. Cascading organizational change. Organ. Sci. (2003a) 14(5):463–482LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Pólos L., Carroll G. R. The fog of change: Opacity and asperity in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003b) 48(3):399–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hogg T., Huberman B. A., McGlade J. M. The stability of ecosystems. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., Ser. B (1989) 237(1286):43–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B. A., Glance N. S. Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1993) 90(16):7716–7718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B. A., Wilkinson D. Performance variability and project dynamics. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (2005) 11(4):307–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Janis I. L.Victims of Groupthink (1971) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keren M., Levhari D. The internal organization of the firm and the shape of average costs. Bell J. Econom. (1983) 14(2):474–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knudsen T., Levinthal D. A. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(1):39–54LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lewontin R. C.The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change (1974) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Loch C., Kavadias S. Coordination and information exchange. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam) 315–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lounamaa P. H., March J. G. Adaptive coordination of a learning team. Management Sci. (1987) 33(1):107–123LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mihm J., Loch C. H., Huchzermeier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moldoveanu M. C., Bauer R. M. On the relationship between organizational complexity and organizational structuration. Organization Sci. (2004) 15(1):98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nadler D. A., Tushman M. L.Competing by Design: The Power of Organizational Architecture (1997) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Radner R. The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica (1993) 61(5):1109–1146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. W. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1969) 2nd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sorenson O., Baum J. A. C. Interorganizational complexity and computation. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Sosa M. E., Eppinger S. D., Rowles C. M. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1674–1689LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Managing the process of engineering change orders. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(2):160–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H., De Meyer A. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering: Alternative coordination strategies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):402–419LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. H. The role of flexibility in the development of new products: An experimental study. Res. Policy (1997) 26(1):105–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. H., Holzner M., Golami T. The crash in the machine. Sci. Amer. (1999) 280(3):92–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van de Ven A. H., Drazin R. The concept of fit in contingency theory. Res. Organ. Behav. (1985) 7:333–365Google Scholar
  • Van Zandt T., Sertel M. Decentralized information processing in the theory of organizations. Contemporary Economic Issues, Economic Behavior and Design (1999) 4(Macmilan, London) 125–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Cattani G., Dorsch A. The value of moderate obsession: Insights from a new model of organizational search. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(3):403–419LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yassine A., Joglekar N., Braha D., Eppinger S., Whitney D. Information hiding in product development: The design churn effect. Res. Engrg. Design (2003) 14(3):145–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.