Quick Response and Retailer Effort

References

• Anand K., Girotra K. The strategic perils of delayed differentiation. Management Sci. (2007) 53(5):697–712Link, Google Scholar
• Anand K., Anupindi R., Bassok Y. Strategic inventories in vertical contracts. Management Sci. (2008) 54(10):1792–1804Link, Google Scholar
• Asker J. Diagnosing foreclosure due to exclusive dealing. (2005) . NYU Working Paper EC-04-36, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Cachon G. P. The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):222–238Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Swinney R. Purchasing, pricing, and quick response in the presence of strategic consumers. Management Sci. (2009a) 55(3):497–511Link, Google Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Swinney R. The value of fast fashion: Rapid production, enhanced design, and strategic consumer behavior. (2009b) . Working paper, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Cachon G. P., Terwiesch C.Matching Supply with Demand: An Introduction to Operations Management (2009) (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. The empire strikes back: Counterrevolutionary strategies for industry leaders. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(11):67–74Google Scholar
• Donohue K. L. Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1397–1411Link, Google Scholar
• Drummond B. Anheuser-Busch joins those bitten by antitrust bug. (Oklahoma City) J. Record (1997) October 3Google Scholar
• Fisher M. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(2):105–116Google Scholar
• Fisher M. L., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):87–99Link, Google Scholar
• Fisher M., Rajaram K., Raman A. Optimizing inventory replenishment of retail fashion products. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2001) 3(3):230–241Link, Google Scholar
• France M. Are corporate predators on the loose. Bus. Week (1998) February 23):125Google Scholar
• Hammond J. H. Barilla SpA (A-D) Teaching note. (1995) . Case 6-695-063, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Heide J. B., Dutta S., Bergen M. Exclusive dealing and business efficiency: Evidence from industry practice. J. Law Econom. (1998) 41(2):387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hubbard P. G., Weiner R. J. Regulation and long-term contracting in US natural gas markets. J. Indust. Econom. (1986) 35(1):71–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyer A. V., Bergen M. E. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):559–570Link, Google Scholar
• Klein B., Lerner A. V. The expanded economics of free-riding: How exclusive dealing prevents free-riding and creates undivided loyalty. ABA Antitrust Law J. (2007) 74(2):473–519Google Scholar
• Kraiselburd S., Raman A. Impact of supply chain contracts on incentives for lead time reduction. (2006) . Working paper, Instituto de Empresa, Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan H., Kapuscinski R., Butz D. A. Coordinating contracts for decentralized supply chains with retailer promotional effort. Management Sci. (2004) 50(1):48–63Link, Google Scholar
• Mandel M. J., France M., Carney D. The great antitrust debate. Bus. Week (2000) June 26):40Google Scholar
• Marvel H. P. Exclusive dealing. J. Law Econom. (1982) 25(1):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten S. E. Minimum bill contracts: Theory and policy. J. Indust. Econom. (1988) 37(1):85–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathewson G. F., Winter R. A. The competitive effects of vertical agreements: Comment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(5):1057–1062Google Scholar
• Mehegan S. Mars hits wholesalers with not so sweet deal. Brandweek (1997) 38(8):3Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
• Moore D. Born on dating: Marketing gimmick or inventory management genius. Logist. Spectrum (1999) 33(3):22–24Google Scholar
• Moran T. St. Stan's Pub sale in escrow. The Modesto Bee (2005) August 16):D1Google Scholar
• Mulherin J. H. Complexity in long-term contracts: An analysis of natural gas contractual provisions. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1986) 2(1):105–117Google Scholar
• Pelehach M. L. Viewpoint: It's time to stay the course. Indust. Distribution (2001) 90(10):M5Google Scholar
• Pinkerton J. Change is our business. Dealerscope (2002) 44(2):39–41Google Scholar
• Rasmusen E. B., Mark Ramseyer J., Wiley J. S. Naked exclusion. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(5):1137–1145Google Scholar
• Sass T. R. The competitive effects of exclusive dealing: Evidence from the U.S. beer industry. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2005) 23(3–4):203–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sher S. A., Russell S. D. Adding bite to exclusive dealing?: An analysis of the Third Circuit's Dentsply decision. The Antitrust Source (2005) MayGoogle Scholar
• Stamborski A. Brewery antitrust probe ends. St. Louis Post-Dispatch (1998) October 16):A1Google Scholar
• Swinney R. Selling to strategic consumers when product value is uncertain: The value of matching supply and demand. (2009) . Working paper, Stanford University Graduate School of Business, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Taylor T. A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):992–1007Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res. Policy (1986) 15(6):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ton Z., McKenney J. L. Campbell Soup Company: Selling channel innovation to customers. (2008) . Case 9-608-141, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Topkis D. M.Supermodularity and Complementarity (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar