On the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem with Price Discrimination

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1160

References

  • Arora N., Dreze X., Ghose A., Hess J. D., Iyengar R., Jing B., Joshi Y., et al. Putting one-to-one marketing to work: Personalization, customization, and choice. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3–4):305–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belloni A., Freund R., Selove M., Simester D. Optimizing product line designs: Efficient methods and comparisons. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1544–1552LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen K. D., Hausman W. H. Technical note: Mathematical properties of the optimal product line selection problem using choice-based conjoint analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):327–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Iyer G. Consumer addressability and customized pricing. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(2):197–208LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhary V., Ghose A., Mukhopadhyay T., Rajan U. Personalized pricing and quality differentiation. Management Sci. (2005) 51(7):1120–1130LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper L. G., Nakanishi M.Market Share Analysis (1988) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day J. M., Venkataramanan M. A. Profitability in product line pricing and composition with manufacturing commonalities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2006) 175(3):1782–1797CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dobson G., Kalish S. Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data. Management Sci. (1993) 39(2):160–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Elrod T., Kumar S. K. Bias in the first choice rule for predicting share. Proc. Sawtooth Software Conf. (1989) 1(Sawtooth Software, Ketchum, ID) 259–271Google Scholar
  • Fruchter G. E., Fligler A., Winer R. S. Optimal product line design: Genetic algorithm approach to mitigate cannibalization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. (2006) 131(2):227–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaul W., Aust E., Baier D. Gewinnorientierte produktliniengestaltung unter berücksichtigung des kundennutzens. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft (1995) 65(8):835–855Google Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Models and heuristics for product line selection. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Choice rules and sensitivity analysis in conjoint simulators. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(1):114–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. An application of a product positioning model to pharmaceutical products. Marketing Sci. (1992) 11(2):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Green P. E., Krieger A. M. Attribute importance weights modification in assessing a brand's competitive potential. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3):253–270LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli R., Krishnamurti R. Optimal product design using conjoint analysis: Computational complexity and algorithms. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1989) 40(2):186–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraus U. G., Yano C. A. Product line selection and pricing under a share-of-surplus choice model. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150(3):653–671CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Zhu W. Designing a family of development-intensive products. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):813–825LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mittelmann H. D. Mixed integer programming: State of the art—Recent benchmarks of optimization software. (2007) . Talk presented at EURO XXII, Prague, Czech Republic, July 10Google Scholar
  • MOSEKThe MOSEK Optimization Tools Manual. Version 5.0 (2007) (MOSEK ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark) Google Scholar
  • Sawtooth SoftwareACA System Version 4.0 (1994) (Sawtooth Software Inc., Evanston, IL) Google Scholar
  • Shaffer G., Zhang Z. J. Competitive one-to-one promotions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1143–1160LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stancu-Minasian I. M.Fractional Programming (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steiner W. J., Hruschka H. A probabilistic one-step approach to the optimal product line design problem using conjoint and cost data. Rev. Marketing Sci. Working Papers (2002) 1(4). Working Paper 4Google Scholar
  • Thisse J. F., Vives X. On the strategic choice of spatial price policy. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1):122–137Google Scholar
  • Varian H. R., Schmalensee R., Willig R. D. Price discrimination. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) 1(North-Holland, Amsterdam) 597–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang X. J., Camm J. D., Curry D. J. A branch-and-price approach to the share-of-choice product line design problem. Management Sci. (2009) 55(10):1718–1728LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.