Effects of Litigation Risk on Board Oversight and CEO Incentive Pay

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1165

References

  • Adams R., Ferreira D. A theory of friendly boards. J. Finance (2007) 62(1):217–250CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almazan A., Suarez J. Entrenchment and severance pay in optimal governance structures. J. Finance (2003) 58(2):519–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayless D. B. The new world of SEC enforcement. (2003) (Morrison & Foerster, San Francisco) . http://library.findlaw.com/2003/Nov/1/133259.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Bebchuk L., Bachelder J., Campos R., Georgiou B., Hevesi A., Lerach W., Mendelsohn R., et al. Director liability. Delaware J. Corporate Law (2006) 31:1011–1045Google Scholar
  • Black B., Cheffins B., Klausner M. Outside director liability. (2004) . Working Paper 250, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Black B., Cheffins B., Klausner M. Outside director liability. Stanford Law Rev. (2006a) 58(4):1055–1160Google Scholar
  • Black B., Cheffins B., Klausner M. Outside director liability: A policy analysis. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (2006b) 162:5–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ewert R., Wagenhofer A. Economic effects of tightening accounting standards to restrict earnings management. Accounting Rev. (2005) 80(4):1101–1124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feltham G., Xie J. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. Accounting Rev. (1994) 69(3):429–453Google Scholar
  • Fich E., Shivdasani A. Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 86:306–336CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher A. Board seats are going begging. Fortune (2005) May 16Google Scholar
  • Fischer P., Verrecchia R. Reporting bias. Accounting Rev. (2000) 75(2):229–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Francis D. At long last, directors may be liable for actions. National Post (2005) January 11):FP2Google Scholar
  • Goldman E., Slezak S. An equilibrium model of incentive contracts in the presence of information manipulation. J. Financial Econom. (2006) 80(3):603–626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hermalin B. Trends in corporate governance. J. Finance (2005) 60(5):2351–2384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hermalin B., Weisbach M. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):96–118Google Scholar
  • Hillegeist S. Financial reporting and auditing under alter- native damage apportionment rules. Accounting Rev. (1999) 74(3):347–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lattman P. Settlement in Just for Feet case may fan board fears. Wall Street Journal (2007) April 23):B6Google Scholar
  • Laux C., Laux V. Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. Accounting Rev. (2009) 84(3):869–891CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lublin J., Francis T., Weil J. Directors are getting the jitters—Recent settlements tapping executives' personal assets put boardrooms on edge. Wall Street Journal (2005) January 13):B1Google Scholar
  • McGee S. The great American corporate director hunt. Institutional Investor (2005) 39(4):32–38Google Scholar
  • Morgenson G. If directors snooze, now they may lose. New York Times (2005) January 9):sec.3Google Scholar
  • Narayanan V. An analysis of auditor liability rules. J. Accounting Res. (1994) 32(Supplement):39–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radhakrishnan S. Investors' recovery friction and auditor liability rules. Accounting Rev. (1999) 74(2):225-240Google Scholar
  • Sale H. Independent directors as securities monitors. Bus. Lawyer (2006) 61(4):1375–1413Google Scholar
  • Schwartz R. Legal regimes, audit quality and investment. Accounting Rev. (1997) 72(3):385–406Google Scholar
  • Schwartz R. Auditors' liability, vague due care, and auditing standards. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting (1998) 11(2):183–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Srinivasan S. Consequences of financial reporting failure for outside directors: Evidence from accounting restatements and audit committee members. J. Accounting Res. (2005) 43(2):291–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wallison P. The WorldCom and Enron settlements: Politics rears its ugly head. Engage (2005) 6(1):58–61Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.