Efficient Structures for Innovative Social Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1168

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(3):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albert R., Barabási A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Modern Phys. (2002) 74(1):47–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H.Organizations Evolving (2000) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Baker W.Achieving Success Through Social Capital: Tapping Hidden Resources in Your Personal and Business Networks (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Barabási A.-L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bavelas A. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. (1950) 22(6):725–730CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. Models of core/periphery structures. Soc. Networks (2000) 21(4):375–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown M. B., Forsythe A. B. Robust tests for equality of variances. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1974) 69(346):364–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R., Nohria N., Eccles R. The social structure of competition. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 57–91Google Scholar
  • Burt R. The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(2):339–365CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. The network structure of social capital. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:345–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R.Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital (2005) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Multiobjective Programming and Planning (1978) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Coleman J.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Erdös P., Renyi A. The evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. (1960) 5:17–61Google Scholar
  • Evans S. N., Steinsaltz D. Estimating some features of NK preference landscapes. Ann. Appl. Probab. (2002) 12(4):1299–1321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson D. Concurrency and commitment: Network scheduling and its consequences for diffusion. J. Math. Soc. (2005) 29(4):295–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gittins J., Jones D., Gani J., Sarkadi K., Vincze I. A dynamic allocation index for the sequential design of experiments. Progress in Statistics (European Meeting Statisticians Budapest 1972) (1974) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 241–266Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János BolyaiGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kaufer D., Carley K.Communication at a Distance (1993) (Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Kauffman S., Levin S. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. J. Theoret. Biol. (1987) 128(1):11–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraatz M. Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(6):621–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leavitt H. Some effects of communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psych. (1951) 46(1):38–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levene H., Olkin I. Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics (1960) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) 278–292Chap. 25Google Scholar
  • Liebeskind J. P., Oliver A. L., Zucker L., Brewer M. Social networks, learning and flexibility: Sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):428–443LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. A survey of algorithmic methods for partially observed Markov decision processes. Ann. Oper. Res. (1991) 28(1):47–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W., Loch C. Minimal and maximal characteristic path lengths in connected sociomatrices. Soc. Networks (2003) 25(4):333–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W., Sinha A. Efficient structures for innovative social networks. (2009) . Working Paper 1136, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris M., Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and transmission dynamics in networks. Soc. Network (1995) 17(1–2):299–318CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nerkar S., Paruchuri A. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):771–785LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M., Barabasi A., Watts D.The Structure and Dynamics of Networks (2006) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Powell W., Koput K., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(1):116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. A “small-world” network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Res. J. (2005) 17(2–3):131–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1113–1126LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J.Business Cycles (1939) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sloane N. J. A.A Handbook of Integer Sequences (1973) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sosa M., Gargiulo M., Rowles C. Component connectivity, team network structure and the attention to technical interfaces in complex product development. (2007) . Working Paper 2007/68/TOM/OB, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organzations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Valente T.Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis (1999) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Watts D.Small Worlds (1999) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-worlds” networks. Nature (1998) 393(6884):409–410Google Scholar
  • Whittle P. Restless bandits: Activity allocation in a changing world. J. Appl. Probab. (1988) 25:287–298CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.