Why Are Bad Products So Hard to Kill?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1169

References

  • Baiman S., Sivaramakrishnan K. The value of private pre-decision information in a principal-agent context. Accounting Rev. (1991) 66(4):747–766Google Scholar
  • Bergmann R., Friedl G. Controlling innovative projects with moral hazard and adverse selection. Res. Policy (2008) 37(9):1504–1514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernardo A. E., Cai H., Luo J. Capital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard. J. Financial Econom. (2001) 61(3):311–344CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bester H., Krähmer D. Delegation and incentives. RAND J. Econom. (2008) 39(3):664–682CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Biyalagorsky E., Boulding W., Staelin R. Stuck in the past: Why managers persist with new product failures. J. Marketing (2006) 70(2):108–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Border K. C., Sobel J. Samurai accountant: A theory of auditing and plunder. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1987) 54(4):525–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W., Kalra A., Staelin R. The quality double whammy. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):463–484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boulding W., Morgan R., Staelin R. Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):164–176CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):39–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brockner J., Rubin J. Z.Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Demski J. S., Sappington D. E. M. Delegated expertise. J. Accounting Res. (1987) 25(1):68–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • De Paola M., Scoppa V. Organizational design, project selection, and incentives. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (2006) 162(3):424–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S., Srinivasan K. Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: Linear and nonlinear price contracts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1608–1623LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Friebel G., Raith M. Resource allocation and organizational form. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics (2010) 2(2):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guedj I., Scharfstein D. Organizational scope and investment: Evidence from the drug development strategies and performance of biopharmaceutical firms. (2004) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guo L. The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):457–471LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R. Research, development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12, Part 1 of 2):1670–1689LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Simester D. I., Wernerfelt B. Side payments in marketing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):246–255LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Im S., Nakata C. Crafting an environment to foster integration in new product teams. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2008) 25(3):164–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert R. A. Executive effort and selection of risky projects. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17(1):77–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laux V. On the value of influence activities for capital budgeting. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2008) 65(3–4):625–635CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt S. D., Snyder C. M. Is no news bad news? Information transmission and the role of “early warning” in the principle-agent model. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(4):641–661CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maine E. Radical innovation through internal corporate venturing: Degussa's commercialization of nanomaterials. R&D Management (2008) 38(4):359–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):121–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Royer I. Why bad projects are so hard to kill. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) February 1):5–12Google Scholar
  • Shin D. Information acquisition and optimal project management. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2008) 26(4):1032–1043CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sung J. Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):720–743CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Townsend R. M. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 21(2):265–293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.