Why Are Bad Products So Hard to Kill?
Published Online:17 May 2010https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1169
References
- The value of private pre-decision information in a principal-agent context. Accounting Rev. (1991) 66(4):747–766Google Scholar
- Controlling innovative projects with moral hazard and adverse selection. Res. Policy (2008) 37(9):1504–1514Crossref, Google Scholar
- Capital budgeting and compensation with asymmetric information and moral hazard. J. Financial Econom. (2001) 61(3):311–344Crossref, Google Scholar
- Delegation and incentives. RAND J. Econom. (2008) 39(3):664–682Crossref, Google Scholar
- Stuck in the past: Why managers persist with new product failures. J. Marketing (2006) 70(2):108–121Crossref, Google Scholar
- Samurai accountant: A theory of auditing and plunder. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1987) 54(4):525–540Crossref, Google Scholar
- The quality double whammy. Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):463–484Link, Google Scholar
- Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):164–176Crossref, Google Scholar
- The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(1):39–61Crossref, Google Scholar
- Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological Analysis (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
- Delegated expertise. J. Accounting Res. (1987) 25(1):68–89Crossref, Google Scholar
- Organizational design, project selection, and incentives. J. Institutional Theoret. Econom. (2006) 162(3):424–449Crossref, Google Scholar
- Demand signalling under unobservable effort in franchising: Linear and nonlinear price contracts. Management Sci. (1995) 41(10):1608–1623Link, Google Scholar
- Resource allocation and organizational form. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics (2010) 2(2):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
- Organizational scope and investment: Evidence from the drug development strategies and performance of biopharmaceutical firms. (2004) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeCrossref, Google Scholar
- The benefits of downstream information acquisition. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(3):457–471Link, Google Scholar
- Research, development, and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12, Part 1 of 2):1670–1689Link, Google Scholar
- Side payments in marketing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):246–255Link, Google Scholar
- Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328Crossref, Google Scholar
- Crafting an environment to foster integration in new product teams. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2008) 25(3):164–172Crossref, Google Scholar
- Executive effort and selection of risky projects. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17(1):77–88Crossref, Google Scholar
- On the value of influence activities for capital budgeting. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2008) 65(3–4):625–635Crossref, Google Scholar
- Is no news bad news? Information transmission and the role of “early warning” in the principle-agent model. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(4):641–661Crossref, Google Scholar
- Radical innovation through internal corporate venturing: Degussa's commercialization of nanomaterials. R&D Management (2008) 38(4):359–371Crossref, Google Scholar
- Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418Link, Google Scholar
- Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):121–160Crossref, Google Scholar
- Why bad projects are so hard to kill. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) February 1):5–12Google Scholar
- Information acquisition and optimal project management. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2008) 26(4):1032–1043Crossref, Google Scholar
- Linearity with project selection and controllable diffusion rate in continuous-time principal-agent problems. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):720–743Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 21(2):265–293Crossref, Google Scholar

