Incentives in New Product Development Projects and the Role of Target Costing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1175

References

  • Baker N., Green S., Bean A. Why R&D projects succeed or fail. Res. Management (1986) 29(6):29–34Google Scholar
  • Bayiz M., Corbett C. Coordination and incentive contracts in project management under asymmetric information. (2005) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  • Bergemann D., Hege U. Venture capital financing, moral hazard and learning. J. Banking Finance (1998) 22(6):703–735CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Feltham G. A., Xie J. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task prinicpal-agent relations. Accounting Rev. (1994) 69(3):429–453Google Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Incentives between firms (and within). Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):2–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Godener A., Söderquist K. E. Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: An exploratory study. R&D Management (2004) 34(2):191–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gutierrez G., Paul A. Analysis of the effects of uncertainty, risk-pooling, and subcontracting mechanisms on project performance. Oper. Res. (2000) 48(6):927–938LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R. Research, development and engineering metrics. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1670–1689LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Zettelmeyer F. Metrics to evaluate R,D&E. Res. Tech. Management (1997) 40(4):32–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Schwarz L. B., Zenios S. A. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(5):167–176Google Scholar
  • Kim B., Oh H. Economic compensation compositions preferred by R&D personnel of different R&D types and intrinsic values. R&D Management (2002) 32(1):47–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J. J., Martimort D.The Theory of Incentives (2002) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lambert R. A. Contracting theory and accounting. J. Accounting Econom. (2001) 32(1–3):3–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C., Tapper U. Implementing a strategy-driven performance measurement system for an applied research group. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 44(8):1032–1048Google Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C., Loch C., Kavadias S. Coordination and information exchange. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Butterworth Heinemann, Amsterdam) 315–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loeve M.Probability Theory (1963) (van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York) Google Scholar
  • McKinsey Design to cost. McKinsey client primer by the product development practice. (2000) . Report, McKinsey & Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Monden Y.Cost Reduction Systems (1995) (Productivity Press, Portland, OR) Google Scholar
  • Murmann P. A. Expected development time reductions in the german mechanical engineering industry. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(3):236–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Omar O. E. Target pricing: A marketing management tool for pricing new cars. Pricing Strategy Practice (1997) 5(2):61–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pronin E., Gilovich T., Ross L. Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psych. Rev. (2004) 111(3):781–789CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savva N., Scholtes S. Double or quits: New product co-development with opt-out options. (2009) . Working paper, London Business School, LondonGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E. The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):863–877LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swenson D., Ansari S., Bell J., Kim I. Best practices in target costing. Management Accounting Quart. (2003) 4(2):12–17Google Scholar
  • Swink M. L. A tutorial on implementing concurrent engineering in new product development programs. J. Oper. Management (1998) 16(1):103–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Managing the process of engineering change orders. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(2):160–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Xu Y. Innovation contests, open innovation, and multiagent problem solving. Management Sci. (2008) 54(9):1529–1543LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. H. Productivity evolution of automotive industry. (2002) Presentation at the POMS High Tech ConferenceSan FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Pearson S. Assessing importance of design through product archaeology. Management Sci. (1998) 44(3):352–369LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.