Is Regime Switching in Stock Returns Important in Portfolio Decisions?

References

• Ang A., Bekaert G. International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15:1137–1187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang A., Bekaert G. How do regimes affect asset allocation? Financial Analysts J. (2004) 60:86–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avramov D. Stock return predictability and model uncertainty. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 64:423–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avramov D. Stock return predictability and asset pricing models. Rev. Financial Stud. (2004) 17:699–738Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avramov D., Wermers R. Investing in mutual funds when returns are predictable. J. Financial Econom. (2006) 81:339–377Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avramov D., Chordia T. Asset pricing models and financial market anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. (2006a) 19:1001–1040Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avramov D., Chordia T. Predicting stock returns. J. Financial Econom. (2006b) 82:387–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barberis N. Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. J. Finance (2000) 55:225–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brandt M., Santa-Clara P., Valkanov R. Parametric portfolio policies: Exploiting characteristics in the cross-section of equity returns. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22:3411–3447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. J. Optimal portfolio choice under uncertainty: A Bayesian approach. (1976) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
• Fama E. F., French K. R. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Finance (1992) 47:427–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fama E. F., French K. R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. (1993) 33:3–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grinold R. C., Kahn R. N.Active Portfolio Management: Quantitative Theory and Applications (1999) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Guidolin M., Timmermann A. Economic implications of bull and bear regimes in UK stock and bond returns. Econom. J. (2005) 115:111–143Google Scholar
• Guidolin M., Timmermann A. Term structure of risk under alternative econometric specifications. J. Econometrics (2006) 131:285–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guidolin M., Timmermann A. Asset allocation under multivariate regime switching. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2007) 31:3503–3544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guidolin M., Timmermann A. International asset allocation under regime switching, skew and kurtosis preference. Rev. Financial Stud. (2008a) 21:889–935Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guidolin M., Timmermann A. Size and value anomalies under regime shifts. J. Financial Econometrics (2008b) 6:1–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton J. D., Susmel R. Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime. J. Econometrics (1994) 64:307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hong Y., Tu J., Zhou G. Asymmetries in stock returns: Statistical tests and economic evaluation. Rev. Financial Stud. (2007) 20:1547–1581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorion P. Bayes-Stein estimation for portfolio analysis. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1986) 21:279–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein R. W., Bawa V. S. The effect of estimation risk on optimal portfolio choice. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:215–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinlay A. C., Pástor Ľ. Asset pricing models: Implications for expected returns and portfolio selection. Rev. Financial Stud. (2000) 13:883–916Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mehra R., Prescott E. The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1985) 15:145–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meucci A.Risk and Asset Allocation (2005) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pástor Ľ. Portfolio selection and asset pricing models. J. Finance (2000) 55:179–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pástor Ľ., Stambaugh R. F. Comparing asset pricing models: An investment perspective. J. Financial Econom. (2000) 56:335–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Quiros G., Timmermann A. Firm size and cyclical variations in stock returns. J. Finance (2000) 55:1229–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perez-Quiros G., Timmermann A. Business cycle asymmetries in stock returns: Evidence from higher order moments and conditional densities. J. Econometrics (2001) 103:259–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schwert G. W. Why does stock market volatility change over time? J. Finance (1989) 44:1115–1153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tu J. Essays in empirical finance: Bull and bear markets, asymmetries in stock returns, and data-generating process uncertainty. (2004) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Washington University in St. Louis, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Tu J., Zhou G. Data-generating process uncertainty: What difference does it make in portfolio decisions? J. Financial Econom. (2004) 72:385–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner C. M., Startz R., Nelson C. R. A Markov model of heteroskedasticity, risk, and learning in the stock market. J. Financial Econom. (1989) 25:3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zellner A., Chetty V. K. Prediction and decision problems in regression models from the Bayesian point of view. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1965) 60:608–616Crossref, Google Scholar