Optimal Choice and Beliefs with Ex Ante Savoring and Ex Post Disappointment
Published Online:9 Jun 2010https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1185
References
- The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1982) 72(3):307–319Google Scholar
- Why stocks may disappoint. J. Financial Econom. (2005) 76(3):471–508Crossref, Google Scholar
- Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of the asset pricing puzzles. J. Finance (2004) 59(4):1481–1509Crossref, Google Scholar
- Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1985) 33(1):1–27Link, Google Scholar
- Are risk-averse agents more optimistic? A Bayesian estimation approach. J. Appl. Econometrics (2008) 23(6):843–860Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal expectations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(4):1092–1118Crossref, Google Scholar
- Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116(1):55–80Crossref, Google Scholar
- Forsaking optimism. Rev. General Psychol. (2006) 10(1):56–73Crossref, Google Scholar
- Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(3):745–788Crossref, Google Scholar
- Habit formation: A resolution of the equity premium puzzle. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(3):519–543Crossref, Google Scholar
- A good sign for multivariate risk taking. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):117–124Link, Google Scholar
- Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework. Econometrica (1989) 57(4):973–969Crossref, Google Scholar
- Optimal illusions and decisions under risk. (2005) . IDEI Working Paper 340, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
- A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica (1991) 59(3):667–686Crossref, Google Scholar
- Precautionary savings in the small and in the large. Econometrica (1990) 58(1):53–73Crossref, Google Scholar
- Standard risk aversion. Econometrica (1993) 61(3):589–611Crossref, Google Scholar
- Denial of death and economic behavior. Adv. Theoretical Econom. (2005) 5(1). Article 5, http://www.bepress.com/bejte/advances/vol5/iss1/art5/Google Scholar
- A model of reference-dependent preferences. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) 121(4):1133–1165Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reference-dependent risk attitudes. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1047–1073Crossref, Google Scholar
- Temporal von Neumann-Morgenstern and induced preferences. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 20(1):81–109Crossref, Google Scholar
- Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):277–323Crossref, Google Scholar
- Temporal risk and the nature of induced preferences. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 33(2):199–231Crossref, Google Scholar
- Choice under uncertainty: Problems solved and unsolved. J. Econom. Perspectives (1987) 1(1):121–154Crossref, Google Scholar
- The affective costs of overconfidence. J. Behav. Decision Making (2004) 17(4):281–295Crossref, Google Scholar
- Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychol. Sci. (1997) 8(8):423–429Crossref, Google Scholar
- The selection of an optimal deductible for a given insurance policy. J. Bus. (1966) 39(1):35–44Crossref, Google Scholar
- Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2(3):225–243Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mood following outcomes: The pivotal role of expectations. (1998) . Working paper, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
- The affective consequences of expected and unexpected outcomes. Psychol. Sci. (2002) 13(1):85–88Crossref, Google Scholar
- Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self-relevant feedback. J. Personality Soc. Psychol. (1996) 70(4):844–855Crossref, Google Scholar
- (Over)insuring modest risks. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Bracing for the worst: Severity, testing, and feedback timing as moderators of the optimistic bias. Personality Soc. Psychol. Bull. (1998) 24(9):915–926Crossref, Google Scholar
- Blessed are those who expect nothing: Lowering expectations as a way of avoiding disappointment. J. Econom. Psychol. (2003) 24(4):505–516Crossref, Google Scholar

