Management Economics in a Large Retail Company

References

• Bailey E., Helfat C. Management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial Decision Econom. (2003) 24(2/3):347–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barro J. R., Barro R. J. Pay, performance, and turnover of bank CEOs. J. Labor Econom. (1990) 8(4):448–481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel A. P., Ichniowski C., Shaw K. Using “insider econometrics” to study productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2004) 94(2):217–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartelsman E. J., Doms M. Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38(3):569–594Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk L. A., Fried J. M. Executive compensation as an agency problem. J. Econom. Perspectives (2003) 17(3):71–92Crossref, Google Scholar
• Becker G. S.Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education (1964) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Bertrand M., Shoar A. Managing with style: The effect of managers on firm policies. Quart. J. Econom. (2003) 118(4):1169–1208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Black S., Lynch L. What's driving the new economy? The benefits of workplace innovation. Econom. J. (2004) 114(493):F97–F116Google Scholar
• Bloom N., Van Reenen J. Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(4):1351–1408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blundell R., Bond S., Windmeijer F. Estimation in dynamic panel data models: Improving on the performance of the standard GMM estimator. (2000) . Working Paper W00/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), LondonGoogle Scholar
• Capelli P., Neumark D. Do “high-performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes? Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (2001) 54(4):737–775Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carpenter M., Wade J. Microlevel opportunity structures as determinants of non-CEO pay. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1085–1103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conyon M. J., Murphy K. J. The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom. Econom. J. (2000) 110(467):F640–F671Google Scholar
• Crossland C., Hambrick D. How national systems differ in their constraints on corporate executives: A study of CEO effects in three countries. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(8):767–789Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cyert R. M., Kang S.-H., Kumar P. Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-management compensation: Theory and evidence. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):453–469Link, Google Scholar
• Drucker P.Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices (1974) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Finkelstein D., Hambrick D., Cannella A.Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management Teams, and Boards (2009) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gabaix X., Landier A. Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quart. J. Econom. (2008) 123(1):49–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffiths R. Product market competition, efficiency and agency costs: An empirical analysis. (2001) . Working Paper WP01/12, Institute for Fiscal Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
• Griffiths R., Haskel J., Neely A. Why is productivity so dispersed? Oxford Rev. Econom. Policy (2006) 22(4):513–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hambrick D., Mason P. The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(2):193–206Google Scholar
• Hayes M., Schaefer S. How much are differences in managerial ability worth? J. Accounting Econom. (1999) 27(2):125–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holcomb T. R., Holmes R. M., Connelly B. L. Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(5):457–485Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55:303–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huselid M. A. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):635–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ichniowski C., Shaw K., Prennushi G. The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1997) 87(3):291–313Google Scholar
• Judson R. A., Owen A. L. Estimating dynamic panel data models: A guide for macroeconomists. Econom. Lett. (1999) 65(1):9–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M. The middle manager as innovator. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) July–August):150–161Google Scholar
• Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) January–February):71–79Google Scholar
• Lambert R., Larcker D., Weigelt K. The structure of organizational incentives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(2):438–461Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(5):841–864Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leepak D., Taylor M., Tekleab A., Marrone J., Cohen D. An examination of the use of high-investment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management (2007) 46(2):223–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberson S., O'Connor J. Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large corporations. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1972) 37(2):117–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lieberman M. B., Lau L. J., Williams M. D. Firm-level productivity and management influence: A comparison of U.S. and Japanese automobile producers. Management Sci. (1990) 36(10):1193–1215Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas R. E. On the size distribution of business firms. Bell J. Econom. (1978) 9(2):508–523Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macduffie J. P. Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1995) 48(2):197–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mundlak Y. Empirical production function free of management bias. J. Farm Econom. (1961) 43(1):44–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy K. J. Incentives, learning, and compensation: A theoretical and empirical investigation of managerial labor contracts. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17(1):59–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickell S. J. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1417–1426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J.The Human Equation: Building Profits By Putting People First (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth K., O'Donnell S. Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(3):678–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terviö M. The difference that CEOs make: An assignment model approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(3):642–668Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou X. CEO pay, firm size, and corporate performance: Evidence from Canada. Canadian J. Econom. (2000) 33(1):213–251Crossref, Google Scholar