Commercializing Science: Is There a University “Brain Drain” from Academic Entrepreneurship?

References

• Adams J. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(4):673–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A. Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management J. (2006) 27(1):63–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A., Henderson R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):44–60Link, Google Scholar
• Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) AUTM U.S. licensing survey: FY 2004 survey summary. (2005) . Retrieved August 17, 2007, http://www.autm.net/Surveys.htmGoogle Scholar
• Audretsch D. B., Stephan P. E. Knowledge spillovers in biotechnology: Sources and incentives. J. Evolutionary Econom. (1999) 9(1):97–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P., Stellman A., Zivin J. G. PublicationHarvester: An open-source software tool for science policy research. Res. Policy (2006) 35(7):970–974Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., David P. A. Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy (1994) 23(5):487–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desruisseaux P. Universities venture into venture capitalism. Chronicle Higher Ed. (2000) May):A44Google Scholar
• Diamond A. M. The life-cycle research productivity of mathematicians and scientists. J. Gerontology (1986) 41(4):520–525Crossref, Google Scholar
• Di Gregorio D., Shane S. Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Res. Policy (2003) 32(2):209–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding W. W., Choi E. Divergent paths or stepping stones: A comparison of scientists' advising and founding activities. (2008) . Mimeo, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley. http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/faculty/papers/ding4_divergent%20paths.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Ding W. W., Murray F., Stuart T. E. Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science (2006) 313(5787):665–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Res. Policy (1998) 27(8):823–833Crossref, Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H. Research groups as “quasi-firms”: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):109–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J., Burton R. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):105–121Link, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. (2001) . NBER Working Paper 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Hall B. H., Mairesse J., Turner L. Identifying age, cohort and period effects in scientific research productivity: Discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2007) 16(2):159–177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., LaLonde R. J., Smith J. A., Ashenfelter O., Card D. The economics and econometrics of active labor market programs. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3(Elsevier, London) 1865–2097Google Scholar
• Jaffe A. The real effects of academic research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1989) 79(5):957–907Google Scholar
• Jensen R., Thursby M. Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 19(1):240–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lach S., Schankerman M. Royalty sharing and technology licensing in universities. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2004) 2(2–3):252–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(1):114–132Google Scholar
• Levy D. The market for fame and fortune. Hist. Political Econom. (1988) 20(4):615–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe R. A., Libecap G. D. The role and experience of start-ups in commercializing inventions: Start-up licensees at the University of California. Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes: New Studies of Entrepreneurship in the United States (2001) (Elsevier Science, New York) 189–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe R. A., Gonzalez-Brambila C. Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity. J. Tech. Transfer (2007) 32(3):173–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F. Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Res. Policy (2002) 31(8–9):1389–1403Crossref, Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH) National survey to evaluate the NIH SBIR Program: Final report. (2003) . Office of Extramural Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
• National Research CouncilWessner C. W.An Assessment of the SBIR Program at the National Institutes of Health (2009) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., Owen-Smith J. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. J. Policy Anal. Management (1998) 27(2):253–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seashore L. K., Blumenthal D., Gluck M. E., Stoto M. A. Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1989) 34(1):110–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S., Venkataraman S. New horizons in entrepreneurship. Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (2004) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA) Google Scholar
• Smith R., Blundell R. An exogeneity test for a simultaneous equation Tobit model with an application to labor supply. Econometrica (1986) 54(3):679–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan P. E. The economics of science. J. Econom. Literature (1996) 34(3):1199–1235Google Scholar
• Stephan P. E., Levin S. G. Property rights and entrepreneurship in science. Small Bus. Econom. (1996) 8(3):177–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S. Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):835–853Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Ding W. W. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 112(1):97–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby M., Thursby J., Gupta-Mukherjee S. Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):577–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toole A. A. The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. (2009) . Mimeo, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
• Toole A. A., Czarnitzki D. Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):716–738Crossref, Google Scholar
• Toole A. A., Czarnitzki D. Exploring the relationship between scientist human capital and firm performance: The case of biomedical academic entrepreneurs in the SBIR program. Management Sci. (2009) 55(1):101–114Link, Google Scholar
• Turner L., Mairesse J. Individual productivity differences in public research: How important are non-individual determinants? An econometric study of French physicists' publications and citations (1986–1997). (2005) . Retrieved April 13, 2010, http://www.jourdan.ens.fr/piketty/fichiers/semina/lunch/Turner2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• United States Patent and Trademark Office U.S. colleges and universities–utility patent grants, calendar years 1969–2005. (2007) . Retrieved August 17, 2007, http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/univ/univ_toc.htmGoogle Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M. Multiplicative panel data models without the strict exogeneity assumption. Econometric Theory (1997) 13(5):667–678Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Xie Y., Shauman K. Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(6):847–870Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J. A study of academic entrepreneurs using venture capital data. (2007) . IZA Discussion Paper 2992, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R. Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1996) 93(23):12709–12716Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Brewer M. B. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(1):290–306Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Armstrong J. S. Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Sci. (2002a) 48(1):138–153Link, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G., Darby M. R., Torero M. Labor mobility from academe to commerce. J. Labor Econom. (2002b) 20(3):629–660Crossref, Google Scholar