The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns

References

• Adams J. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(4):673–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams J. D., Black G. C., Clemmons J. R., Stephan P. E. Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Res. Policy (2005) 34(3):259–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agrawal A., Goldfarb A. Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(4):1578–1590Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alford R. D.Naming and Identity (1988) (HRAF Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Anft M. Of mice and medicine. Johns Hopkins Magazine (2008) 60(4). http://www.jhu.edu/jhumag/0908web/mice.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Azoulay P., Ding W. W., Stuart T. E. The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality, and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. (2009) 57(4):637–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Azoulay P., Zivin J. S., Wang J. Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. (2010) 125(2):549–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barley S. R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(1):78–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bozeman B., Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res. Policy (2004) 33(4):599–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Comm. ACM (1993) 36(12):67–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burkhardt M. E., Brass D. J. Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):104–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler D. M., Butler R. J., Rich J. T. The equalizing effect of the Internet on access to research expertise in political science and economics. PS: Political Sci. Politics (2008) 41(3):579–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Res. (1996) 6(2–3):41–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corporation for Research & Educational Networking (CREN) CREN history and future. (1997) . June 1997. http://www.cren.net/cren/cren-hist-fut.htmlGoogle Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562Link, Google Scholar
• Ding W. W., Murray F., Stuart T. E. Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science (2006) 313(5787):665–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox M. F. Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1983) 13(2):285–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fox M. F., Mohapatra S. Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. J. Higher Ed. (2007) 78(5):542–571Crossref, Google Scholar
• Furman J. L., Stern S. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. (2009) . Working paper, Boston University, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Ginther D. K., Kahn S., Freeman R. B., Goroff D. L. Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973–2001. Science and Engineering Careers in the United States (2009) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 163–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gourman J.The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities (1980–1997) 8 editions(Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Gourieroux C., Monfort A., Trognon A. Pseudo maximum-likelihood methods—Applications to Poisson models. Econometrica (1984) 52(3):701–720Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh D. S., Oster S. M. Tools or toys? The impact of high technology on scholarly productivity. Econom. Inquiry (2002) 40(4):539–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hesse B. W., Sproull L. S., Kiesler S. B., Walsh J. P. Returns to science—Computer-networks in oceanography. Comm. ACM (1993) 36(8):90–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrys M. The Internet in the 1980s. (n.d.) . http://computing.dcu.ie/˜humphrys/net.80s.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Jones B. F. The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) 76(1):283–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones B. F., Wuchty S., Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science (2008) 322(5905):1259–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaminer N., Braunstein Y. M. Bibliometric analysis of the impact of Internet use on scholarly productivity. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1998) 49(8):720–730Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelley M. R. Productivity and information technology—The elusive connections. Management Sci. (1994) 40(11):1406–1425Link, Google Scholar
• Kim E., Morse A., Zingales L. Are elite universities losing their competitive edge? J. Financial Econom. (2009) 93(3):353–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee S., Bozeman B. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc. Stud. Sci. (2005) 35(5):673–702Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. Research productivity over the life cyle—The evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(1):114–132Google Scholar
• Levin S., Stephan P., Winkler A. E. Innovation in academe: The diffusion of Internet technologies. (2010) . Working paper, University of Missouri–St. Louis, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Levin S., Glanzel W., Stephan P., Winkler A. E. The diffusion of IT and the increased propensity of teams to transcend institutional boundaries. (2009) . Working paper, University of Missouri– St. Louis, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
• Lieberson S., Bell E. O. Children's 1st names—An empirical study of social taste. Amer. J. Sociol. (1992) 98(3):511–554Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long J., Fox M. F. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1995) 21:45–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G., Rosenfeld R., Spilerman S. Geographical constraints on women's careers in academia. Science (1979) 205(4412):1225–1231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murray F., Aghion P., Dewatripoint M., Kolev J., Stern S. Of mice and academics: Examining the effects of openness on innovation. (2008) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF) America's investment in the future. (2009) . http://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf0050/internet/launch.htmGoogle Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Redner S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. Eur. Physical J. B (1998) 4(2):131–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rosenblat T. S., Mobius M. M. Getting closer or drifting apart? Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):971–1009Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos Silva J., Tenreyro S. The log of gravity. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):641–658Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shauman K. A., Xie Y. Geographical mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography (1996) 33(4):455–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1992) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Stephan P., Hall B., Rosenberg N. The economics of science. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (2010) 1(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 218–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan P., Levin S.Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place and Time (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Stuart T. E., Ding W. W. When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of academic entrepreneurship in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2006) 112(1):97–144Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne M., Brynjolfsson E. Global village or cyber balkans? Modeling and measuring the integration of electronic communities. Management Sci. (2005) 51(6):851–868Link, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Bayma T. Computer networks and scientific work. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1996) 26(3):661–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh J. P., Kucker S., Maloney N. G., Gabbay S. Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (2000) 51(14):1295–1305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winkler A. E., Levin S. G., Stephan P. The diffusion of IT in higher education: Publishing productivity of academic life scientists. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2010) 19(5):481–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wuchty S., Jones B. F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (2007) 316(5827):1036–1039Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Y., Shauman K. Sex differences in research productivity. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1998) 63(6):847–870Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zakon R. Hobbes' Internet timeline v8.1. (2005) . http://www.zakon.org/robert/internet/timelineGoogle Scholar