Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1199

References

  • Anderson S. P., Coate S. Market provision of broadcasting: A welfare analysis. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2005) 72(4):947–972CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(3):668–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baden-Fuller C., MacMillan I., Demil B., Lecocq X. Special issue call for papers: Business models. Long Range Planning (2008) Google Scholar
  • Beebe J. H. Institutional structure and program choices in television markets. Quart. J. Econom. (1977) 91(1):15–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourreau M. Mimicking vs. counter-programming strategies for television programs. Inform. Econom. Policy (2003) 15(1):35–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caillaud B., Jullien B. Chicken and egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):309–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Ghemawat P. Dynamic mixed duopoly: A model motivated by Linux vs. Windows. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1072–1084LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Hervas-Drane A. Peer-to-peer file sharing and the market for digital information goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2010) 19(2):333–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Ricart J.-E. From strategy to business model and onto tactics. Long Range Planning (2010) 43(2):195–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Ruiz-Aliseda F. Platform competition, compatibility, and social efficiency. (2009) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, BostonCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Yoffie D. Wintel: Cooperation and conflict. Management Sci. (2007) 53(4):584–598LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R., Zhu F. Strategies to fight ad-sponsored rivals. (2010) . HBS Working Paper 10-026, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J. P. Broadcast competition and advertising with free entry: Subscription vs. free-to-air. Inform. Econom. Policy (2006) 18(2):181–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crampes C., Haritchabalet C., Jullien B. Advertising, competition and entry in media industries. J. Indust. Econom. (2009) 57(1):7–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deneckere R. J., McAfee R. P. Damaged goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5(2):149–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Depken C. A., Wilson D. P. Is advertising a good or a bad? Evidence from U.S. magazine subscriptions. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2):61–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doganoglu T., Wright J. Multihoming and compatibility. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2006) 24(1):45–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doyle C. Programming in a competitive broadcasting market: Entry, welfare and regulation. Inform. Econom. Policy (1998) 10(1):23–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N., Katsamakas E. Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):1057–1071LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. G., Salkever D. S. Generic entry and the pricing of pharmaceuticals. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 6(1):75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabszewicz J. J., Wauthy X. Y. Two-sided markets and price competition with multi-homing. (2004) . Mimeo, CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve University, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  • Gabszewicz J. J., Laussel D., Sonnac N. Programming and advertising competition in the broadcasting industry. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 13(4):657–669CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabszewicz J. J., Laussel D., Sonnac N. Does advertising lower the price of newspapers to consumers? A theoretical appraisal. Econom. Lett. (2005) 87(1):127–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gabszewicz J. J., Laussel D., Sonnac N. Competition in the media and advertising markets. Manchester School (2006) 74(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gal-Or E., Dukes A. J. Minimum differentiation in commercial media markets. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2003) 12(3):291–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P.Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy (1991) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hagiu A. Two-sided platforms: Pricing and social efficiency. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2009) 18(4):1011–1043CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khanna T., Oberholzer-Gee F., Sjoman A., Jensen A. D., Dessain V. Metro international S.A.. (2007) . HBS Case 708-429, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Lee D., Mendelson H. Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Production Oper. Management (2008) 17(1):12–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B. Excess capacity as a barrier to entry: An empirical appraisal. J. Indust. Econom. (1987) 35(4):607–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madambath M. NYTimes plans paid subscription for online content again. (2009) . WATBlog.com (February 5), http://www.watblog.com/2009/02/05/nytimes-plans-paid-subscription-for-online-content-again/Google Scholar
  • Markides C. C.Game-Changing Strategies: How to Create New Market Space in Established Industries by Breaking the Rules (2008) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peitz M., Valletti T. M. Content and advertising in the media: Pay-TV versus free-to-air. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2008) 26(4):949–965CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E. What is strategy? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) November–December):61–78Google Scholar
  • Prasad A., Mahajan V., Bronnenberg B. Advertising versus pay-per-view in electronic media. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2003) 20(1):13–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seamans R. Fighting City Hall: Entry deterrence and new technology deployment in local cable TV markets. (2009) . Working paper, University of California, Berkeley, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon D. Incumbent pricing responses to entry. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(13):1229–1248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spence M., Owen B. Television programming, monopolistic competition, and welfare. Quart. J. Econom. (1977) 91(1):103–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spulber D. F. Market making by price setting firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1996) 63(2):559–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spulber D. F., Hendershott T. Firms and networks in two-sided markets. Handbooks in Information Systems, Vol. 1: Economics and Information Systems (2006) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 137–200Google Scholar
  • Steiner P. O. Program patterns and preferences, and the workability of competition in radio broadcasting. Quart. J. Econom. (1952) 66(2):194–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wilbur K. C. A two-sided, empirical model of television advertising and viewing markets. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):356–378LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yamawaki H. Price reactions to new competition: A study of US luxury car market, 1986–1997. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2002) 20(1):19–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F. Business models and compatibility incentives. (2008) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu F., Iansiti M. Entry into platform-based markets. (2009) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zott C., Amit R. Designing your future business model: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning (2010) 43(2):216–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.