The World Is Not Small for Everyone: Inequity in Searching for Knowledge in Organizations

References

• Adamic L., Adar E. How to search a social network. Soc. Networks (2005) 27(3):187–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Austin J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):866–878Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barnard H. R., Bernard H. R., Killworth P. D., McCarty C. ndex: An informant-defined experiment in social structure. Soc. Forces (1982) 61(1):99–133Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(4):697–725Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Brandon D. P., Hollingshead A. B. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(6):633–644Link, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individuals influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):518–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(2):327–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casciaro T., Lobo M. S. When competence is irrelevant: The role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2008) 53(4):655–684Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatman J. A., O'Reilly C. A. Working smarter and harder: A longitudinal study of managerial success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(4):603–627Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. F., Yoo M., Baker W. E. The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organ. (2003) 1(3):301–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denrell J., Arvidsson N., Zander U. Managing knowledge in the dark: An empirical study of the reliability of capability evaluations. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1491–1503Link, Google Scholar
• Ding W. W., Levin S. G., Stephan P. E., Winkler A. E. The impact of information technology on academic scientists' productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Sci. (2010) 56(9):1439–1461Link, Google Scholar
• Dodds P., Muhamad R., Watts D. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science (2003) 301(5634):827–829Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(4):350–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., King C., Juda A. Small worlds and regional innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954Link, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1978) 1(3):215–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladwell M.The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference (2002) (Back Bay Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Guare J.Six Degrees of Separation (1990) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Lovas B. How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8):801–822Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison J., Carroll G. Organizational demography and culture: Insights from a formal model and simulation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43(3):637–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. Organizational information systems: Determinants of their performance and behavior. Management Sci. (1982) 28(2):138–155Link, Google Scholar
• Hubert G., Daft R., Jablin F., Putnam L. L., Roberts K. H., Porter L. W. The information environment of organizations. Handbook of Organization Communication (1987) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 130–163Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(3):422–447Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(3):673–703Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1997) 60(1):91–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. M.Men and Women of the Corporation (1977) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1183–1194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keltner D., Gruenfeld D. H., Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psych. Rev. (2003) 110(2):265–284Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P. D., Bernard H. R. The reversal small-world experiment. Soc. Networks (1978) 1(2):159–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P. D., Bernard H. R. A pseudomodel of the small world problem. Soc. Forces (1979) 58(2):477–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• Killworth P. D., McCarty C., Bernard H., House M. The accuracy of small world chains in social networks. Soc. Networks (2006) 28(1):85–96Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective. Proc. 32nd ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2000) (ACM, New York) 163–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kleinfeld J. S. The small world problem. Society (2002) 39(2):61–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kochen M.The Small World (1989) (Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ) Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Walker G. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66(3):317–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Korte C., Milgram S. Acquaintance links between white and negro populations: Application of the small world method. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1970) 15(2):101–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D. Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(2):342–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld P. F., Merton R. K., Berger M. Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and Control in Modern Society (1954) (Van Nostrand, New York) 18–66Google Scholar
• Lin N., Dayton P., Greenwald P., Ruben B. D. The urban communication network and social stratification: A small world experiment. Communication Yearbook (1978) 1(Transaction Books, New Brunswick) 107–119Google Scholar
• McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2001) 27(1):415–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgram S. The small world problem. Psych. Today (1967) 1(1):60–67Google Scholar
• Miller J. G. Living systems: The organization. Behavioral Sci. (1972) 17(1):1–8Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintz B., Schwartz M. Interlocking directorates and interest group formation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1981) 46(6):851–869Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintz B., Schwartz M.The Power Structure of American Business (1985) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Moreland R., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J., Brower A. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What's Social About Social Cognition? (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. The intentional distortion of information in organization communication: A laboratory and field approach. Human Relations (1978) 31(2):173–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips D. The promotion paradox: Organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 106(4):1058–1098Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. A status-based model of market competition. Amer. J. Sociol. (1993) 98(4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Amer. J. Sociol. (2001) 107(1):33–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Baron J. Resources and relationships: Social networks, mobility, and satisfaction in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(5):673–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pool I., Kochen M. Contacts and influence. Soc. Networks (1978) 1(1):5–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogan M. Too close for comfort? The effect of embeddedness and competitive overlap on client relationship retention following an acquisition. (2010) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainbleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Rogan M. A., Mors M. L. The investment of individual resources in professional relationships. Acad. Management Best Paper Proc. (2009) Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NYCrossref, Google Scholar
• Ruef M., Aldrich H. E., Carter N. C. The structure of founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2003) 68(2):195–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A., Phelps C. C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1113–1126Link, Google Scholar
• Schulz M. Pathways of relevance: Exploring inflows of knowledge into subunits of multinational corporations. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(4):440–459Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):756–770Link, Google Scholar
• Singh J., Agrawal A. K. Recruiting for ideas: How firms exploit the prior inventions of new hires. (2010) . NBER Working Paper 15869, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Stuart T., Podolny J. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Special Issue):21–38Google Scholar
• Travers J., Milgram S. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry (1969) 32(4):425–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(5):996–1004Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuma N., Hannan M.Social Dynamics: Models and Methods (1984) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration andc reativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111(2):447–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Amaral L. A. N., Reed-Tsochas F. Small-world networks and management science research: A review. Eur. Management Rev. (2007) 4:77–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105(2):493–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D., Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (1998) 393(6684):440–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Mullen G., Goethals G. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behaviors (1987) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wegner D. M., Erber R., Raymond P. Transactive memory in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1991) 61(6):923–929Crossref, Google Scholar