Nested Simulation in Portfolio Risk Measurement

References

• Acerbi C., Tasche D. On the coherence of expected shortfall. J. Banking Finance (2002) 26(7):1487–1503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J.-M., Heath D. Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance (1999) 9(3):203–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boesel J., Nelson B. L., Kim S.-H. Using ranking and selection to “clean up” after simulation optimization. Oper. Res. (2003) 51(5):814–825Link, Google Scholar
• David H. A.Order Statistics (1981) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• De Prisco B., Iscoe I., Jiang Y., Mausser H. Compound scenarios: An efficient framework for integrated market-credit risk. J. Risk (2007) 11(2):1–36Google Scholar
• Duffie D.Dynamic Asset Pricing Theory (1996) 2nd ed.(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Glasserman P.Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (2004) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glynn P. W., Whitt W. The asymptotic efficiency of simulation estimators. Oper. Res. (1992) 40(3):505–520Link, Google Scholar
• Gordy M. B., Szegö G. P. Granularity adjustment in portfolio credit risk measurement. Risk Measures for the 21st Century (2004) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Gordy M. B., Juneja S., Perrone L. F., Lawson B. G., Liu J., Wieland F. P. Efficient simulation for risk measurement in a portfolio of CDOs. Proc. 2006 Winter Simulation Conf. (2006) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 749–756Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gordy M. B., Juneja S. Nested simulation in portfolio risk measurement. (2008) . FEDS 2008-21, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Gouriéroux C., Laurent J. P., Scaillet O. Sensitivity analysis of values at risk. J. Empirical Finance (2000) 7(3–4):225–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim J. H. T., Hardy M. R. Quantifying and correcting the bias in estimated risk measures. ASTIN Bull. (2007) 37(2):365–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lan H., Nelson B. L., Staum J., Henderson S. G., Biller B., Hsieh M.-H., Shortle J., Tew J. D., Barton R. R. A confidence interval for tail conditional expection via two-level simulation. Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf. (2007a) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 949–957Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lan H., Nelson B. L., Staum J., Henderson S. G., Biller B., Hsieh M.-H., Shortle J., Tew J. D., Barton R. R. Two-level simulations for risk management. Proc. 2007 Winter Simulation Conf. (2007b) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 102–107Google Scholar
• Lan H., Nelson B. L., Staum J. A confidence interval procedure for expected shortfall risk measurement via two-level simulation. Oper. Res. (2010) 58(5):1481–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Lang S.Analysis I (1968) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lee S.-H. Monte Carlo computation of conditional expectation quantiles. (1998) . Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lesnevski V., Nelson B. L., Staum J. Simulation of coherent risk measures based on generalized scenarious. Management Sci. (2007) 53(11):1756–1769Link, Google Scholar
• Longstaff F. A., Schwartz E. S. Valuing American options by simulation: A simple least-squares approach. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(1):113–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin R., Tasche D. Shortfall: A tail of two parts. Risk (2007) 20(2):84–89Google Scholar
• Martin R., Wilde T. Unsystematic credit risk. Risk (2002) 15(11):123–128Google Scholar
• Quenouille M. H. Notes on bias in estimation. Biometrika (1956) 43(3–4):353–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E. Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2(3):225–243Crossref, Google Scholar