Time-Tradeoff Sequences for Analyzing Discounting and Time Inconsistency

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1219

References

  • Abdellaoui M. Parameter-free elicitation of utilities and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1497–1512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Abdellaoui M., Attema A. E., Bleichrodt H. Intertemporal tradeoffs for gains and losses: An experimental measurement of discounted utility. Econom. J. (2010) 120:595–611Google Scholar
  • Abdellaoui M., Vossmann F., Weber M. Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1384–1399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Andersen S., Harrison G. W., Lau M. I., Rutstrom E. E. Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica (2008) 76:583–618CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N., Karlan D., Yin W. Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitments savings product in the Phillippines. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) 121:635–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M., Heukamp F. H. Probability and time tradeoff. (2009) . Mimeo, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  • Baucells M., Heukamp F. H. Common ratio using delay. Theory Decision (2010) 68:149–158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol W. J. The cardinal utility which is ordinal. Econom. J. (1958) 68:665–672Google Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Pinto J. L. A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1485–1496LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bleichrodt H., Rohde K. I. M., Wakker P. P. Non-hyperbolic time inconsistency. Games Econom. Behav. (2009) 66:27–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bommier A. Uncertain lifetime and intertemporal choice: Risk aversion as a rationale for time discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2006) 47:1223–1246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bostic R., Herrnstein R. J., Luce R. D. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1990) 13:193–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psych. Rev. (2006) 113:409–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H. Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 8:167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19:7–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carbone E. Temptations and dynamic consistency. Theory Decision (2008) 64:229–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chapman G. B. Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1996) 22:771–791CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta P., Maskin E. Uncertainty and hyperbolic discounting. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95:1290–1299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delquié P. Inconsistent trade-offs between attributes: New evidence in preference assessment biases. Management Sci. (1993) 39:1382–1395LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dolan P., Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Econom. J. (2008) 118:215–234Google Scholar
  • Ebert J. E. J., Prelec D. The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Sci. (2007) 53:1423–1438LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Epper T., Fehr-Duda H., Bruhin A. Uncertainty breeds decreasing impatience: The role of risk preferences in time discounting. (2009) . Mimeo, IED, ETH, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C., Rubinstein A. Time preference. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1982) 23:677–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frederick S., Loewenstein G. F., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. J. Econom. Literature (2002) 40:351–401CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gigliotti G., Sopher B. Analysis of intertemporal choice: A new framework and experimental results. Theory Decision (2004) 55:209–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gold M. R., Siegel J. E., Russell L. B., Weinstein M. C.Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gollier C., Zeckhauser R. J. Aggregation of heterogeneous time preferences. J. Political Econom. (2005) 113:878–896CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Green L., Fristoe N., Myerson J. Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomes. Psychonomic Bull. Rev. (1994) 1:383–389CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy Y. Strotz meets Allais: Diminishing impatience and the certainty effect. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98:1145–1162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halevy Y. Time consistency: Stationarity and time invariance. (2009) . Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey C. M. Value functions for infinite-period planning. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1123–1139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harvey C. M. Proportional discounting of future costs and benefits. Math. Oper. Res. (1995) 20:381–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hertwig R., Ortmann A. Experimental practices in economics: A challenge for psychologists? Behav. Brain Sci. (2001) 24:383–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holcomb J. H., Nelson P. S. Another experimental look at individual time preference. Rationality Soc. (1992) 4:199–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber J., Ariely D., Fischer G. Expressing preference in a principal-agent task: A comparison of choice, rating, and matching. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2001) 87:66–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kapteyn A., Teppa F. Hypothetical intertemporal consumption choices. Econom. J. (2003) 113:C140–C152Google Scholar
  • Keller L. R., Strazzera E. Examining predictive accuracy among discounting models. J. Risk Uncertainty (2002) 24:143–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koopmans T. C. Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica (1960) 28:287–309CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krantz D. H., Luce R. D., Suppes P., Tversky A.Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I: Additive and Polynomial Representations (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Laibson D. I. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112:443–477CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G. F. Anticipation and the value of delayed consumption. Econom. J. (1987) 97:666–684CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107:573–597CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazur J. E., Commons M. L., Mazur J. E., Nevin J. A., Rachlin H. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (1987) 5(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–73Google Scholar
  • Milkman K. L., Rogers T., Bazerman M. H. Highbrow films gather dust: Time-inconsistent preferences and online DVD rentals. Management Sci. (2009) 55:1047–1059LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery H., Humphreys P. C., Svenson O., Vari A. Decision rules and the search for a dominance structure: Towards a process model of decision making. Analyzing and Aiding Decision Processes (1983) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 343–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noor J. Hyperbolic discounting and the standard model: Eliciting discount functions. J. Econom. Theory (2009) 144:2077–2083CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89:103–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Choice and procrastination. Quart. J. Econom. (2001) 116:121–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D. Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and “hyperbolic” discounting. Scandinavian J. Econom. (2004) 106:511–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prelec D., Loewenstein G. F. Decision making over time and under uncertainty: A common approach. Management Sci. (1991) 37:770–786LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Frederick S., Orsel B., Rahman J. Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. Management Sci. (2005) 51:1326–1335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rohde K. I. M. The hyperbolic factor: A measure of time inconsistency. J. Risk Uncertainty (2010) 41:125–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubinstein A. Economics and psychology? The case of hyperbolic discounting. Internat. Econom. Rev. (2003) 44:1207–1216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sayman S., Öncüler A. An investigation of time-inconsistency. Management Sci. (2009) 55:470–482LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scholten M., Read D. Discounting by intervals: A generalized model of intertemporal choice. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1424–1436LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scholten M., Read D. Intertemporal tradeoffs. Psych. Rev. (2010) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sopher B., Sheth A. A deeper look at hyperbolic discounting. Theory Decision (2006) 60:219–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38:332–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strotz R. H. Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1956) 23(3):165–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Takeuchi K. Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games Econom. Behav. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Tanaka T., Camerer C. F., Nguyen Q. Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100:557–571CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Some empirical evidence of dynamic inconsistency. Econom. Lett. (1981) 8:201–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. (1972) 79:281–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Sattath S., Slovic P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95:371–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van der Pol M., Cairns J. A comparison of the discounted utility model and hyperbolic discounting models in the case of social and private intertemporal preferences for health. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 49:79–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wakker P. P. Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion. Theory Decision (1994) 36:1–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wathieu L. Habits and the anomalies in intertemporal choice. Management Sci. (1997) 43:1552–1563LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.