Target Age and the Acquisition of Innovation in High-Technology Industries

References

• Ahuja G., Katila R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(3):197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Andrade G., Mitchell M., Stafford E. New evidence and perspectives on mergers. J. Econom. Perspect. (2001) 15(2):103–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):50–64Link, Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan N., Gerwin D., Thomson V. Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1690–1703Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. J., Warner J. B. Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. J. Financial Econom. (1985) 14(1):3–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brunnermeier M. K., Nagel S. Hedge funds and the technology bubble. J. Finance (2004) 59(5):2013–2040Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carow K., Heron R., Saxton T. Do early birds get the returns? An empirical investigation of early-mover advantages in acquisitions. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(6):563–585Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan T., Nickerson J. A., Owan H. Strategic management of R&D pipelines with cospecialized investments and technology markets. Management Sci. (2007) 53(4):667–682Link, Google Scholar
• Chang S. Takeovers of privately held targets, methods of payment, and bidder returns. J. Finance (1998) 53(2):773–784Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S., Tabrizi B. Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):123–130Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri S., Iansiti M., Tabrizi B. The multilevel impact of complexity and uncertainty on the performance of innovation-motivated acquisitions. (2005) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Chesbrough H. W.Open Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston) Google Scholar
• Clark D. J., Konrad K. A. Fragmented property rights and incentives for R&D. Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):969–981Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corrocher N., Malerba F., Montobbio F. Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field. Res. Policy (2007) 36(3):418–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox D. R. Regression models and life tables. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (1972) 34(2):187–202Google Scholar
• Ding M., Eliashberg J. Structuring the new product development pipeline. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):343–363Link, Google Scholar
• Faccio M., McConnell J. J., Stolin D. Returns to acquirers of listed and unlisted targets. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2006) 41(1):197–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Times U.S. technology M&A-Lex column. (2006) London Edition(January 13):20Google Scholar
• Fuller K., Netter J., Stegemoller M. What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. J. Finance (2002) 57(4):1763–1793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gans J. S., Stern S. The product market and the market for “ideas”: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs. Res. Policy (2003) 32(2):333–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1452–1466Link, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Offerman T. Efficiency in auctions with private and common values: An experimental study. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(3):625–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeree J. K., Offerman T. Competitive bidding in auctions with private and common values. Econom. J. (2003) 113(489):598–613Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Hall B., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 36(1):783–804Google Scholar
• Hannan M. T., Freeman J. Structural inertia and organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1984) 49(2):149–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hauser J., Tellis G. J., Griffin A. Research on innovation: A review and agenda for marketing science. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(6):687–717Link, Google Scholar
• Hayward M. L. A. When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990–1995. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(1):21–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):422–436Link, Google Scholar
• Higgins M. J., Rodriguez D. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. J. Financial Econom. (2006) 80(2):351–383Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsu D. H., Ziedonis R. H. Patents as quality signals for entrepreneurial ventures. DRUID Summer Conf. Appropriability, Proximity, Routines and Innovation (2007) June 18–20Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
• Huchzermeier A., Loch C. H. Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R&D. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):85–101Link, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M. Shooting the rapids: Managing product development in turbulent environments. Calif. Management Rev. (1995) 38(1):37–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jain S., Ramdas K. Up or out or stay put? Product positioning in an evolving technology environment. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(3):362–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(2):323–329Google Scholar
• Kalaignanam K., Shankar V., Varadarajan R. Asymmetric new product development alliances: Win-win or win-lose partnerships? Management Sci. (2007) 53(3):357–374Link, Google Scholar
• Krishna V.Auction Theory (2002) (Academic Press, London) Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Bhattacharya S. Technology selection and commitment in new product development: The role of uncertainty and design flexibility. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):313–327Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Lambrecht B. M. The timing and terms of mergers motivated by economies of scale. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 72(1):41–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Tang C. S. Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):40–53Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C. Rush and be wrong or wait and be late: A model of information in collaborative processes. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(3):331–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacKinlay A. C. Event studies in economics and finance. J. Econom. Literature (1997) 35(1):13–39Google Scholar
• Mantecon T. An analysis of the implications of uncertainty and agency problems on the wealth effects to acquirers of private firms. J. Banking Finance (2008) 32(5):892–905Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature (1987) 25(2):699–738Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G. A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):974–996Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath R. G., Nerkar A. Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• McWilliams A., Siegel D. Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(3):626–657Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P. Auctions and bidding: A primer. J. Econom. Perspect. (1989) 3(3):3–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller S. B., Schlingemann F. P., Stulz R. M. Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 73(2):201–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller S. B., Schlingemann F. P., Stulz R. M. Wealth destruction on a massive scale? A study of acquiring-firm returns in the recent merger wave. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):757–782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moeller T. Let's make a deal! How shareholder control impacts merger payoffs. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 76(1):167–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Officer M. S. The price of corporate liquidity: Acquisition discounts for unlisted targets. J. Financial Econom. (2007) 83(3):571–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puranam P., Singh H., Zollo M. Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(2):263–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Kotha S. Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1263–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schiesel S. Acquisitions by the technology companies of start-up small-fry offer a sampler on how deals can go wrong. New York Times (2000) June 5):3Google Scholar
• Shane S., Ulrich K. T. Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):133–144Link, Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Vishny R. W. Stock market driven acquisitions. J. Financial Econom. (2003) 70(3):295–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorensen J. B., Stuart T. E. Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):81–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):455–465Link, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C., Niederkofler M. When product development performance makes a difference: A statistical analysis in the electronics industry. J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15(1):3–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. E. Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Management Sci. (1999) 45(5):641–658Link, Google Scholar
• Warner A. G., Fairbank J. F., Steensma H. K. Managing uncertainty in a formal standards-based industry: A real options perspective on acquisition timing. J. Management (2006) 32(2):279–298Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziedonis R. H. Don't fence me in: Fragmented markets for technology and the patent acquisition strategies of firms. Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):804–820Link, Google Scholar