Modifying the Mean-Variance Approach to Avoid Violations of Stochastic Dominance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1224

References

  • Allais M. Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine. Econometrica (1953) 21(4):503–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernasconi M. Nonlinear preferences and two-stage lotteries: Theories and evidence. Econom. J. (1994) 104(422):54–70Google Scholar
  • Borch K. A note on uncertainty and indifference curves. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1969) 36(1):1–4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C., Ho T.-H. Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 8(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gul F. A theory of disappointment aversion. Econometrica (1991) 59(3):667–686CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hey J. Does repetition improve consistency? Experiment. Econom. (2001) 4(1):5–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loomes G. Modelling choice and valuation in decision experiments. Psych. Rev. (2010) 117(3):902–924CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machina M. “Expected utility” analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):277–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 7(1):77–91Google Scholar
  • Quiggin J. Risk perception and risk aversion among Australian farmers. Australian J. Agricultural Resource Econom. (1981) 25(2):160–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samuelson P. Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers. Scientia (1963) 98:108–113Google Scholar
  • von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.