The Firm as a Socialization Device

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1239

References

  • Akerlof G. A. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. (1982) 97(4):543–569CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A. Loyalty filters. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(1):54–63Google Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E. Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(1):9–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E. Identity, supervision, and workgroups. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(2):212–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E.Identity Economics. How Our Identities Shape Our Work, Wages, and Well-Being (2010) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alchian A. A., Demsetz H. Production, information costs, and economic organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1972) 62(5):777–795Google Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117(1):39–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnard C. I.The Functions of the Executive (1968) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bolton G. E., Ockenfels A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(1):166–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M.Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bowles S. Endogenous preferences: The cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J. Econom. Literature (1998) 36(1):75–111Google Scholar
  • Callon M., Callon M. Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The Laws of the Markets (1998) (Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA) 1–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casadesus-Masanell R. Trust in agency. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2004) 13(3):375–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dal Bó P. Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(5):1591–1604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dufwenberg M., Heidhues P., Kirchsteiger G., Riedel F., Sobel J. Other-regarding preferences in general equilibrium. (2008) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  • Durkheim E.The Division of Labor in Society (1984) (Free Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eccles R. G. The quasifirm in the construction industry. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1981) 2(4):335–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A., Fischbacher U. A theory of reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. (2006) 54(2):293–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Fischbacher U. Why social preferences matter—The impact of non-selfish motives on competition, cooperation, and incentives. Econom. J. (2002) 112(478):C1–C33Google Scholar
  • Fehr E., Gächter S. Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(3):159–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal-agent model. Scand. J. Econom. (2004) 106(3):453–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E., Klein A., Schmidt K. M. Fairness and contract design. Econometrica (2007) 75(1):121–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frank R. H. If homo economicus could choose his own utility function, would he want one with a conscience? Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(4):593–604Google Scholar
  • Frank R. H., Gilovich T., Regan D. T. Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? J. Econom. Perspect. (1993) 7(2):159–171CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Giddens A.Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim, and Max Weber (1971) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(1):33–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Polit. Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison J. R., Carroll G. R. The dynamics of cultural influence networks. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (2002) 8(1):5–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Polit. Econom. (1990) 98(6):1119–1158CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R. What do managers do (to build competitive advantage)? The development of relational contracts and the origins of organizational capability. (2008) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):324–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(1):24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):972–991Google Scholar
  • Hursthouse R.On Virtue Ethics (1999) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Kalleberg A. L., Reve T. Contracts and commitment: Economic and sociological perspectives on employment relations. Human Relations (1993) 45(9):1103–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kandel E., Lazear E. P. Peer pressure and partnerships. J. Polit. Econom. (1992) 100(4):801–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muller J. Z.The Mind and the Market: Capitalism in Western Thought (2003) (Anchor Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ostrom E., Walker J. Trust and reciprocity as foundations for cooperation: Individuals, institutions, and context. (2007) . Working Paper W07-3, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):129–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Paine J. B., Bachrach D. G. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J. Management (2000) 26(3):513–563CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polanyi K.The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2001) (Beacon Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Rabin M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83(5):1281–1302Google Scholar
  • Raub W. A general game-theoretic model of preference adaptations in problematic social situations. Rationality Soc. (1990) 2(1):67–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rob R., Zemsky P. Social capital, corporate culture, and incentive intensity. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(2):243–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roberts J.The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth (2004) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J. J. Human relations in the workplace. J. Polit. Econom. (1994) 102(4):684–717CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotemberg J. J. Endogenous altruism in buyer-seller relations and its implications for vertical integration. (2006) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Seabright P.The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life (2004) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica (1951) 19(3):293–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Organizations and markets. J. Econom. Perspect. (1991) 5(2):25–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A.The Theory of Moral Sentiments (2010) (Penguin Group, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel J. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econom. Literature (2005) 43(2):392–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sobel J. Markets make people appear selfish. (2008) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  • Tabellini G. The scope of cooperation: Values and incentives. Quart. J. Econom. (2008) 123(3):905–950CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Steen E. Interpersonal authority in a theory of the firm. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2010) 100(1):466–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vohs K. D., Mead N. L., Goode M. R. The psychological consequences of money. Science (2006) 314(5802):1154–1156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weber M., Roth G., Wittich C.Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (1978) (University of California Press, Berkeley) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. Amer. J. Soc. (1981) 87(3):548–577CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.