What Makes Them Tick? Employee Motives and Firm Innovation

References

• Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E. Identity and the economics of organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(1):9–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen T. J., Katz R. Age, education and the technical ladder. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1992) 39(3):237–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T.Creativity in Context (1996) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Conti R. Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(6):630–640Crossref, Google Scholar
• Amabile T. M., Hill K. G., Hennessey B. A., Tighe E. M. The work preference inventory—Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 66(5):950–967Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ambrose M. L., Kulik C. T. Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. J. Management (1999) 25(3):231–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D., Gneezy U., Loewenstein G., Mazar N. Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2009) 76(2):451–469Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arrow K. J., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–626Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Besley T., Ghatak M. Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(3):616–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J., Brown C., Mathiowetz N., Heckman J. J., Leamer E. E. Measurement error in survey data. Handbook of Econometrics (2001) 5(Elsevier, Amsterdam) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown C., Medoff J. L. Firm age and wages. J. Labor Econom. (2003) 21(3):677–697Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cable D. M., Edwards J. R. Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(5):822–834Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer C. F., Hogarth R. M. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-function framework. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):7–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cockburn I. M., Henderson R. M. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):157–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Sauermann H., Malerba F., Brusoni S. Schumpeter's prophecy and individual incentives as a driver of innovation. Perspectives on Innovation (2007) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 73–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). (2000) . NBER Working Paper 7552, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M.Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention (1996) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Dasgupta P., David P. A. Toward a new economics of science. Res. Policy (1994) 23(5):487–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci E. L., Koestner R., Ryan R. M. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. (1999) 125(6):627–668Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dunbar K., Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. E. How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. The Nature of Insight (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 365–395Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R., Shanock L. Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Res. J. (2003) 15(2–3):121–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(3):443–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B., Stutzer A. Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. J. Institutional Theoretical Econom. (2004) 160(3):377–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey B. S., Jegen R. Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys (2001) 15(5):589–611Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman R. S., Foerster J. Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 88(2):263–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gagne M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26(4):331–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gambardella A., Harhoff D., Verspagen B. The value of patents. (2006) . Working paper, Bocconi University, MilanGoogle Scholar
• Giuri P., Mariani M., Brusoni S., Crespi G., Francoz D., Gambardella A., Garcia-Fontes W., et al. Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Res. Policy (2007) 36(8):1107–1127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldberger M. L., Flattau P., Maher B. A.Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change (1995) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica (1957) 25(4):501–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gundry L. K. Fitting into technical organizations—The socialization of newcomer engineers. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1993) 40(4):335–345Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Motivation through the design of work—Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16(2):250–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton B. H. Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. (2000) 108(3):604–631Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C. On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1999) 78(1):25–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. The evolution of integrative capability: Innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):607–630Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennessey B. A., Amabile T. M. Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. Amer. Psych. (1998) 53(6):674–675Crossref, Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) Employee inventor compensation practices survey. (2004) . IPO, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414Link, Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman M., Bowden E. M., Haberman J., Frymiare J. L., Arambel-Liui S., Greenblatt R., Reber P. J., Kounios J. Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology (2004) 2(4):500–510Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D.Attention and Effort (1973) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Katz R., Katz R. Motivating professionals in organizations. The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation (2004) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–20Google Scholar
• Keller L. M., Bouchard T. J., Arvey R. D., Segal N. L., Dawis R. V. Work values: Genetic and environmental influences. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(1):79–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koenker R., Hallock K. Quantile regression. J. Econom. Perspect. (2001) 15(4):143–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N. Different missions and commitment power in R&D organizations: Theory and evidence on industry-university alliances. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(3):565–582Link, Google Scholar
• Lacetera N., Zirulia L. Knowledge spillovers, competition, and taste for science in a model of R&D incentive provision. (2008) . Working paper, Case Western Reserve University, ClevelandGoogle Scholar
• Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user-to-user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):923–943Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear E. Incentives in basic research. J. Labor Econom. (1997) 15(1):S167–S197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. J. Econom. Perspect. (2005) 19(2):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Long J. S., Freese J.Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using STATA (2005) 2nd ed.(Stata Press, College Station, TX) Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D. W., Nelson R. R. Intellect and motive in scientific inventors: Implications for supply. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 361–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manners G., Steger J. A., Zimmerer T. W. Motivating your R&D staff. Res.-Tech. Management (1997) 40(6):29–34Google Scholar
• Manso G. Motivating innovation. (2010) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Merton R. K.The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Moorman R. H., Podsakoff P. M. A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational-behavior research. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. (1992) 65(2):131–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murdock K. Intrinsic motivation and optimal incentive contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(4):650–671Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R. The economics of invention: A survey of the literature. J. Bus. (1959) 32(2):101–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oaxaca R., Ransom M. R. On discrimination and the decomposition of wage differentials. J. Econometrics (1994) 61(1):5–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oi W. Y., Idson T. L., Ashenfelter O., Card D. Firm size and wages. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3B(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 2165–2214Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. Conceptual-framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25(9):833–848Link, Google Scholar
• Pedhazur E. J., Schmelkin L. P.Measurement, Design, and Analysis: An Integrated Approach (1991) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Pelz D. C., Andrews F. M.Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development (1976) revised ed.(Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie J. Y., Lee J. Y. Common methods bias in behavioral research: A critical review and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature (1999) 37(1):7–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M., Sauermann H. A taste for science? Ph.D. scientists' academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy (2010) 39(3):422–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J., Hann I. H., Slaughter S. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999Link, Google Scholar
• Rosen S., Ashenfelter O., Layard R. The theory of equalizing differences. Handbook of Labor Economics (1986) (North-Holland, Amsterdam) 641–692Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psych. (2000) 25(1):54–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H. Vocational choice: A decision making perspective. J. Vocational Behav. (2005) 66(2):273–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H., Stephan P. E. Twins or strangers? Differences and similarities between academic and industrial science. (2010) . NBER Working Paper 16113, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Sauermann H., Roach M., Zhang W. Is there a “Taste for Science”? Individuals' preferences and the organization of science. (2010) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
• Schmookler J. Economic sources of inventive activity. J. Econom. Hist. (1962) 22(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry Into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J. A.Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1942) (Harper & Brothers, New York) Google Scholar
• Siemsen E. The hidden perils of career concerns in R&D organizations. Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):863–877Link, Google Scholar
• Skinner B. F.Science and Human Behavior (1953) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Stephan P. E. The economics of science. J. Econom. Literature (1996) 34(3):1199–1235Google Scholar
• Stephan P. E., Levin S. G.Striking the Mother Lode in Science (1992) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Stern S. Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. (2004) 50(6):835–853Link, Google Scholar
• Super D. E.Work Values Inventory (1964) (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Topel R. Specific capital, mobility, and wages—Wages rise with job seniority. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(1):145–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vallas S. P., Kleinman D. L. Contradiction, convergence, and the knowledge economy: The confluence of academic and commercial biotechnology. Socio-Econom. Rev. (2008) 6(2):283–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Eerde W., Thierry H. Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(5):575–586Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weisberg R. W.Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts (2006) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar