Imperfect Competition in Financial Markets: An Empirical Study of Island and Nasdaq

References

• Angel J., Harris L., Spatt C. Equity trading in the 21st century. Quart. J. Finance (2011) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bacidore J., Battalio R., Jennings R. Order submission strategies, liquidity supply, and trading in pennies on the New York Stock Exchange. J. Financial Markets (2003) 6(3):337–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barclay M., Hendershott T., McCormick T. Competition among trading venues: Information and trading on electronic communications networks. J. Finance (2003) 58(6):2637–2665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernhardt D., Hughson E. Splitting orders. Rev. Financial Stud. (1997) 10(1):69–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bessembinder H. Trade execution costs and market quality after decimalization. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (2003) 38(4):747–777Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B., Hillion P., Spatt C. An empirical analysis of the order book and order flow in the Paris Bourse. J. Finance (1995) 50(5):1655–1689Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biais B., Martimort D., Rochet J. C. Competing mechanisms in a common value environment. Econometrica (2000) 68(4):799–837Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunge J. Exchanges to petition SEC on sub-penny pricing. Wall Street Journal (2010) January 26). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703808904575025271531438864.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Chakrabarty B., Li B., Nguyen V., Van Ness R. Trade classification algorithms for electronic communications network trades. J. Banking Finance (2007) 31(12):3806–3821Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chung K., Chuwonganant C., McCormick T. Order preferencing and market quality on Nasdaq before and after decimalization. J. Financial Econom. (2004) 71(3):581–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erenburg G., Lasser D. Electronic limit order book and order submission choice around macroeconomic news. Rev. Financial Econom. (2009) 18(4):172–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fink J., Fink K., Weston J. Competition on the Nasdaq and the growth of electronic communication networks. J. Banking Finance (2006) 30(9):2537–2559Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T. Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market. J. Financial Markets (1999) 2(2):99–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Foucault T., Kadan O., Kandel E. The limit order book as a market for liquidity. Rev. Financial Stud. (2005) 18(4):1171–1217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glosten L. Is the electronic limit order book inevitable? J. Finance (1994) 49(4):1127–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goettler R., Parlour C., Rajan U. Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market. J. Finance (2005) 60(5):2149–2192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldstein M., Shkilko A., Van Ness B., Van Ness R. Competition in the market for Nasdaq securities. J. Financial Markets (2008) 11(2):113–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L. Stock price clustering and discreteness. Rev. Financial Stud. (1991) 4(3):389–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L. Minimum price variations, discrete bid-ask spreads, and quotation sizes. Rev. Financial Stud. (1994) 7(1):149–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris L. Trading in pennies: A survey of the issues. (1999) . Working paper, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
• Harris L., Hasbrouck J. Market versus limit orders: The SuperDOT evidence on order submission strategy. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1996) 31(2):213–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck J. Trades, quotes, inventories and information. J. Financial Econom. (1988) 22(2):229–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hasbrouck J., Saar G. Technology and liquidity provision: The blurring of traditional definitions. J. Financial Markets (2009) 12(2):143–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T., Jones C. Island goes dark: Transparency, fragmentation, and regulation. Rev. Financial. Stud. (2005a) 18(3):743–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendershott T., Jones C. Trade-through prohibitions and market quality. J. Financial Markets (2005b) 8(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang R. The quality of ECN and Nasdaq market maker quotes. J. Finance (2002) 57(3):1285–1319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kyle A. Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica (1985) 53(6):1315–1336Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAndrews J., Stefanadis C. The emergence of electronic communications networks in the U.S. equity markets. Current Issues Econom. Finance (2000) 6(12):1–6Google Scholar
• Mehta N. SEC may allow subpenny pricing for more stocks, Shillman says. Bloomberg (2010) February 23). http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a0emVxHjtZaMGoogle Scholar
• Nguyen V., Phengpis C. An analysis of the opening mechanisms of exchange traded fund markets. Quart. Rev. Econom. Finance (2009) 49(2):562–577Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parlour C. Price dynamics in limit order markets. Rev. Financial Stud. (1998) 11(4):789–816Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rakowski D., Beardsley X. W. Decomposing liquidity along the limit order book. J. Banking Finance (2008) 32(8):1687–1698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rock K. The specialist's order book and price anomalies. (1990) . Working paper, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Roşu I. A dynamic model of the limit order book. Rev. Financial Stud. (2009) 22(11):4601–4641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sandas P. Adverse selection and competitive market making: Empirical evidence from a limit order market. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(3):705–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simaan Y., Weaver D., Whitcomb D. Market-maker quotation behavior and pretrade transparency. J. Finance (2003) 58(3):1247–1268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sukumar N. Bats Europe to cut tick sizes in market share battle (update 1). Bloomberg (2009) June 10). http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=anBdexG4du1kGoogle Scholar