The End of the Robinson-Patman Act? Evidence from Legal Case Data

References

• Baker J. B. Predatory pricing after Brooke Group: An economic perspective. Antitrust Law J. (1994) 62(3):585–603Google Scholar
• Baker J. B., Shapiro C., Pitofsky R. Reinvigorating horizontal merger enforcement. How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark: The Effect of Conservative Economic Analysis on U.S. Antitrust (2008) (Oxford University Press, New York) 235–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bork R. H.The Antitrust Paradox, A Policy at War with Itself (1978) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Bowman W. S. Restraint of trade by the Supreme Court: The Utah Pie case. Yale Law J. (1967) 77(1):70–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denger M. L., Herfort J. A. Predatory pricing claims after Brooke Group. Antitrust Law J. (1994) 62(3):541–558Google Scholar
• Diana T. Communications to competitors bring antitrust potential. Business Credit (2007) 109(4):20Google Scholar
• Edwards C. D.The Price Discrimination Law (1959) (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Elzinga K. G., Hogarty T. F. Utah Pie and the consequences of Robinson-Patman. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):427–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gifford D. J. Farewell to the Robinson-Patman Act? The antitrust modernization commission's report and recommendation. Antitrust Bull. (2008) 53(3):481–516Google Scholar
• Institute of Management and Administration 21 best practices to help credit pros prepare for the year-end close. Managing Credit, Receivables & Collections (2006) September 1). http://www.ioma.com/MCRC/2006_9/1609510-1.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Katz M. L. The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(1):154–167Google Scholar
• Kirkwood J. The Robinson-Patman Act and consumer welfare: Has Volvo reconciled them? Seattle Univ. Law Rev. (2007) 30(Winter):349–376Google Scholar
• Klompmaker J. E., Rodgers W. H., Nygren A. E. Value not volume. Marketing Management (2003) 12(3):45–48Google Scholar
• Monroe K.Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (2002) 3rd ed.(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• O'Brien D. P., Shaffer G. The welfare effects of forbidding discriminatory discounts: A secondary-line analysis of Robinson-Patman. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1994) 10(2):296–318Google Scholar
• Posner R. A.The Robinson-Patman Act: Federal Regulation of Price Differences (1976) (American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Rodell S. Antitrust law: The fall of the Morton Salt rule in secondary-line price discrimination cases. Florida Law Rev. (2006) 58(4):967–975Google Scholar
• Ross T. Winners and losers under the Robinson-Patman Act. J. Law Econom. (1984) 37(1):243–271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spriggs M. T., Nevin J. R. The legal status of trade and functional price discounts. J. Public Policy Marketing (1994) 13(1):61–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stevens W. H. S. An interpretation of the Robinson-Patman Act. J. Marketing (1937) 2(1):38–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoll N. R., Goldfein S. Supreme Court places Robinson-Patman Act on life support. New York Law J. (2006) February 21):3Google Scholar
• Suhr J. M. Reading too much into Reeder-Simco? Michigan Law Rev. (2007) 106(October):169–188Google Scholar
• Tarpey L. X. Buyer liability under the Robinson-Patman Act: A current appraisal. J. Marketing (1972) 36(1):38–42Crossref, Google Scholar