Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1247

References

  • Amstrup S. C., McDonald T. L., Manly B. F. J.Handbook of Capture-Recapture Analysis (2005) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Baron R. A., Ensley M. D. Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Sci. (2006) 52(9):1331–1344LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cochran W. G., David H. A. Laplace's ratio estimators. Contributions to Survey Sampling and Applied Statistics (1978) (Academic Press, New York) 3–10Google Scholar
  • Cormack R. M. Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika (1964) 51(3–4):429–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahan E., Mendelson H. An extreme value model of concept testing. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):102–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl D. W., Moreau C. P. The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(1):47–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dawkins B. Siobhan's problem: The coupon collector revisited. Amer. Statistician (1991) 45(1):76–82Google Scholar
  • Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(3):497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erat S., Krishnan V. Managing delegated search over design spaces. (2010) . SSRN Working paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1567599Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., Mingo S., Loch C., Kavadias S. Creativity in new product development: An evolutionary integration. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Butterworth/Heinemann, Oxford, UK) 113–134Chap. 5Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):909–928CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Mingo S., Chen D. Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2007) 52(3):443–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. Management Sci. (2010) 56(4):591–605LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Girvan M., Newman M. E. J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99(12):7821–7826CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Griffin A., Hauser J. R. The voice of the customer. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):1–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gulbahce N., Lehmann S. The art of community detection. Bioessays (2008) 30(10):934–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hays W. L., Winkler R. L.Statistics: Probability, Inference, and Decision (1971) (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Kopalle P. K., Novak T. P. The “right” consumers for better concepts: Identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):854–865CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchinson J. W., Raman K., Mantrala M. K. Finding choice alternatives in memory: Probability models of brand name recall. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(4):441–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallenberg O.Foundations of Modern Probability (1997) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Karp R. M., Miller R. E., Thatcher J. W. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. Complexity of Computer Computations (1972) (Plenum, New York) 85–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katila R., Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(6):1183–1194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kavadias S., Sommer S. C. The effects of problem structure and team expertise on brainstorming effectiveness. Management Sci. (2009) 55(12):1899–1913LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kawakita J.The Original KJ Method (1991) (Kawakita Research Institute, Tokyo) Google Scholar
  • Knudsen T., Levinthal D. A. Two faces of search: Alternative generation and alternative evaluation. Management Sci. (2007) 18(1):39–54AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Kohn M. G., Shavell S. The theory of search. J. Econom. Theory (1974) 9(2):93–123CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koput K. W. A chaotic model of innovative search: Some answers, many questions. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(5):528–542LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lincoln F. C. Calculating waterfowl abundance on the basis of banding returns. (1930) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) . U.S. Department of Agriculture Circular 118Google Scholar
  • Lippman S. A., McCall J. J. The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry (1976) 14(2):155–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Kavadias S., Loch C. H., Kavadias S. Managing new product development: An evolutionary framework. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Butterworth/Heinemann, Oxford, UK) 1–26Chap. 1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (Blackwell, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Martin X., Mitchell W. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Res. Policy (1998) 26(7–8):753–771CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan P., Manning R. Optimal search. Econometrica (1985) 53(4):923–944CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mullen B., Johnson C., Salas E. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1991) 12(1):3–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborn A. F.Applied Imagination (1957) (Charles Scribner's Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Perkins D.The Eureka Effect: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking (2000) (Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Punj G., Stewart D. W. Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. J. Marketing Res. (1983) 20(2):134–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rao V. R., Katz R. Alternative multidimensional scaling methods for large stimulus sets. J. Marketing Res. (1971) 8(4):488–494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratneshwar S., Barsalou L. W., Pechmann C., Moore M. Goal-derived categories: The role of personal and situational goals in category representations. J. Consumer Psych. (2001) 10(3):147–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. W., Siggelkow N. Patterned interaction in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Sci. (2007) 53(7):1068–1085LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(4):287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothschild M. Searching for the lowest price when the distribution of prices is unknown. J. Political Econom. (1974) 82(4):689–711CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott J.Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (2000) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Seber G. A. F. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika (1965) 52(1–2):249–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Seber G. A. F.The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters (1982) 2nd ed.(Macmillan Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A.The Sciences of the Artificial (1996) 3rd ed.(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Singh J., Fleming L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. (2010) 56(1):41–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Six J. M., Tollis I. G. Effective graph visualization via node grouping. Proc. IEEE Sympos. Inform. Visualization 2001 (INFOVIS'01) (2001) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 51–58Google Scholar
  • Sommer S. C., Loch C. H. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stevens G. A., Burley J. 3000 ideas = 1 commercial success! Res. Tech. Management (1997) 40(3):16–27Google Scholar
  • Stigler G. J. The economics of information. J. Political Econom. (1961) 69(3):213–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E., Podolny J. M. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(S1):21–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sudman S., Sirken M. G., Cowan C. D. Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science (1988) 240(4855):991–996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Shane S. Product development as a problem solving process. Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (2008) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) 143–172Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. T.Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities (2009) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Toubia O. Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(5):411–425LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psych. Rev. (1977) 84(4):327–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Eppinger S. D.Product Design and Development (2008) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York) Google Scholar
  • Weitzman M. L. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica (1979) 47(3):641–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yan B., Gregory S. Detecting communities in networks by merging cliques. IEEE Internat. Conf. Intelligent Comput. Intelligent Systems (ICIS 2009) (2009) Shanghai:832–836Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.