Bargaining Chains

References

• Bernheim B., Whinston M. Common agency. Econometrica (1986) 54(4):923–942Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowley A. L. On bilateral monopoly. Econom. J. (1928) 38:651–659Google Scholar
• Coase R. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econom. (1960) 3(1):1–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C., Grossman P. Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Econom. Inquiry (2001) 39(2):171–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edgeworth F. Y.Mathematical Psychics: An Essay on the Application of Mathematics to the Moral Sciences (1881) (C. Kegan Paul & Co., Chesterland, OH) Google Scholar
• Ertogral K., Wu S. D. A bargaining game for supply chain contracting. (2001) . Working paper, Manufacturing Logistics Institute, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PAGoogle Scholar
• Fellner W.Competition Among the Few (1949) (Knopf, New York) Google Scholar
• Forsythe R., Horowitz J., Savin N., Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econom. Behav. (1994) 6(3):347–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granot D., Yin S. Competition and cooperation in decentralized push and pull assembly systems. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):733–747Link, Google Scholar
• Gurnani H., Shi M. A bargaining model for first-time interaction under asymmetric beliefs of supply reliability. Management Sci. (2006) 52(6):865–880Link, Google Scholar
• Guth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1982) 3(4):367–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrison G., McKee M. Experimental evaluation of the Coase theorem. J. Law Econom. (1985) 28(3):653–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C. Approaches to the bargaining problem before and after the theory of games: A critical discussion of Zeuthen's, Hick's, and Nash's theories. Econometrica (1956) 24(2):144–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H.Foundations of Human Sociality (2004) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman E., Spitzer M. The Coase theorem: Some experimental tests. J. Law Econom. (1982) 25(1):73–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman D., Knetsch J., Thaler R. Fairness and the assumption of economics. J. Bus. (1986) 59(4):S285–S300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Park H. A coooperative game theory model of quantity discounts. Management Sci. (1989) 35(6):693–707Link, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W. S. Conversations with supply chain managers. (2010a) . Working Paper 1145, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborCrossref, Google Scholar
• Lovejoy W. S. Bargaining chains (long version). (2010b) . Working Paper 1146, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann ArborCrossref, Google Scholar
• Marshall A.Principles of Economics (1890) (MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
• Michener H., Ginsberg I., Yuen K. Effects of core properties in four-person games with side payments. Behav. Sci. (1979) 24(4):263–280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Myerson R.Game Theory (1991) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M., Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains: The assembly problem. Management Sci. (2008) 54(8):1482–1496Link, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M., Sošić G. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2008) 187(3):719–745Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nagarajan M., Sošić G. Coalition stability in assembly models. Oper. Res. (2009) 57(1):131–145Link, Google Scholar
• Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18(2):155–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osborne M., Rubinstein A.Bargaining and Markets (1990) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Pigou A.The Economics of Welfare (1908) (MacMillan, London) Google Scholar
• Prat A., Rustichini A. Games played through agents. Econometrica (2003) 71(4):989–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Puterman M.Markov Decision Processes (1994) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raiffa H., Kuhn H., Tucker A. Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games Vol 2, Annals of Mathematical Studies 28 (1953) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 361–387Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A., Malouf M. Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psych. Rev. (1979) 86(6):574–594Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A., Prasnikar V., Okuno-Fujiwara M., Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Lubljana, Pittsburgh and Tokyo: An experimental study. Am. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(3):1068–1095Google Scholar
• Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica (1982) 50(1):97–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schelling T.The Strategy of Conflict (1960) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Siegel S., Fouraker L.Bargaining and Group Decision Making: Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly (1960) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Shapley L. S., Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games (1953) 2(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler G.The Theory of Price (1942) (MacMillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Zeuthen F.Problems of Monopoly and Social Welfare (1930) (Routledge, London) Google Scholar