Estimating the Operational Impact of Container Inspections at International Ports

References

• Abt C. C. The economic impact of nuclear terrorist attacks on freight transport systems in an age of seaport vulnerability. (2003) . Report, Abt Associates, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Bakshi N., Gans N. Securing the containerized supply chain: Analysis of government incentives for private investment. Management Sci. (2010) 56(2):219–233Link, Google Scholar
• Bennett A. C., Chin Y. Z. 100% container scanning: Security policy implications for global supply chains. (2008) . Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Boske L. B. Port and supply-chain security initiatives in the United States and abroad. (2006) . Report, Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, University of Texas, AustinGoogle Scholar
• Brown L., Zhao L. A test for the Poisson distribution. Sankhya, Series A (2002) 64(3):611–625Google Scholar
• Brown L., Gans N., Mandelbaum A., Sakov A., Shen H., Zeltyn S., Zhao L. Statistical analysis of a telephone call center: A queueing-science perspective. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(469):36–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fairnie D. DP World, director of security, speech at World Customs Organization forum: What future for 100% scanning? (2008) . Brussels, June 11Google Scholar
• Field A. Manufacturers say 10 + 2 costs $20 billion. J. Commerce Online–News Story (2009) June 19). http://www.joc.com/government-regulation/manufacturers-say-102-costs-20-billionGoogle Scholar
• Flynn S. E.America the Vulnerable: How Our Government Is Failing to Protect Us from Terrorism (2004) (HarperCollins, New York) Google Scholar
• Flynn S. E.The Edge of Disaster: Rebuilding a Resilient Nation (2007) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Flynn S. E. Overcoming the flaws in the U.S. government efforts to improve container, cargo, and supply chain security. (2008) Testimony before the Homeland Security Appropriations SubcommitteeApril 2, 2008U.S. House of RepresentativesGoogle Scholar
• Green L., Kolesar P., Whitt W. Coping with time-varying demand when setting staffing requirements for a service system. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(1):13–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrald J. R., Stephens H. W., van Dorp J. R. A framework for sustainable port security. J. Homeland Security Emergency Management (2004) 1(2). Article 12, http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol1/iss2/12/Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H., Heal G. Interdependent security. J. Risk Uncertainty (2003) 26(2–3):231–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H., Heal G. IDS models of airline security. J. Conflict Resolution (2005) 49(2):201–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunreuther H. C., McNulty P. J., Kang Y. Third-party inspection as an alternative command and control regulation. Risk Anal. (2002) 22(2):309–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Law A. M., Kelton W. D.Simulation Modeling and Analysis (2007) 4th ed.(McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
• Marine Link The 5% myth. (2004) . Accessed August 16, 2010, http://www.marinelink.com/news/article/the-5-myth/317423.aspxGoogle Scholar
• Martonosi S. E., Ortiz D. S., Willis H. H., Richardson H. W., Gordon P., Moore J. E. Evaluating the viability of 100 percent container inspection at America's ports. The Economic Impact of Terrorist Attacks (2006) (Edward Edgar Publishing, Northampton, MA) 218–241Google Scholar
• McClure G. How safe are our ports? (2007) . Accessed August 16, 2010, http://www.todaysengineer.org/2007/Sep/port-security.aspGoogle Scholar
• Policy Research Corporation The impact of 100% scanning of U.S.-bound containers on maritime transport. (2009) . Final report, Commissioned by the European Commission, Directorate-General Energy and Transport. Accessed August 16, 2010, http://ec.europa.eu/transport/maritime/studies/doc/2009_04_scanning_containers.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Steenken D., Voß S., Stahlbock R. Container terminal operation and operations research—A classification and literature review. OR Spectrum (2004) 26(1):3–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• U.S. Congress H.R.1: Implementing recommendations of the 9/11 commission act of 2007. (2007) Pub. L. No. 110-53, 110th CongressAccessed October 27, 2010, http://intelligence.senate.gov/laws/pl11053.pdfGoogle Scholar
• U.S Customs and Border Protection (CBP) FAQ on 24-hour advance vessel manifest rule. (2004) . Accessed August 16, 2010, http://www.customs.gov/ImageCache/cgov/content/import/carriers/24hour_5frule/24hour_5ffaq_2edoc/v1/24hour_5ffaq.doc. Last accessed on 08/16/10Google Scholar
• U.S Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Report to congress on integrated scanning system pilots (Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006, Section 231). (2008) (U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Container security: A flexible staffing model and minimum equipment requirements would improve overseas targetting and inspection efforts. (2005) . Report GAO-05-557, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Supply chain security: Examination of high-risk Cargo at foreign seaports have increased, but improved data collection and performance measures are needed. (2008a) . Report GAO-08-187, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office Supply chain security: Challenges to scanning 100 percent of U.S.-bound Cargo containers. (2008b) . Report GAO-08-533T, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office CBP works with international entities to promote global customs security standards and initiatives, but challenges remain. (2008c) . Report GAO-08-538, U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Wein L. M., Liu Y., Cao Z., Flynn S. E. The optimal spatiotemporal deployment of radiation portal monitors can improve nuclear detection at overseas ports. Sci. Global Security (2007) 15:211–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wein L. M., Wilkins A. H., Baveja M., Flynn S. E. Preventing the importation of illicit nuclear materials in shipping containers. Risk Anal. (2006) 26(5):1377–1393Crossref, Google Scholar
• Willis H. H., Ortiz D. S. Evaluating the security of the global containerized supply chain. (2004) . Report TR-214-RC, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar