Information Goods vs. Industrial Goods: Cost Structure and Competition

References

• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1613–1630Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R. D., Kemerer C. F. Scale economies in new software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1989) 15(10):416–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benediktsson O., Dalcher D., Reed K., Woodman M. COCOMO-based effort estimation for iterative and incremental software development. Software Quality J. (2003) 11(4):265–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H. K., Choudhary V. Information goods and vertical differentiation. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(2):89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H. K., Choudhary V. When is versioning optimal for information goods? Management Sci. (2008) 54(5):1029–1035Link, Google Scholar
• Boehm B. W.Software Engineering Economics (1981) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Boehm B. W., Abts C., Chulani S. Software development cost estimation approaches—A survey. Ann. Software Engrg. (2000) 10(1–4):177–205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonanno G. Vertical differentiation with Cournot competition. Econom. Notes (1986) 15(2):68–91Google Scholar
• Brooks F. P.The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Software Engineering, 20th Anniversary Edition (1995) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Choi C. J., Shin H. S. A comment on a model of vertical product differentiation. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(2):229–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• CIOL Intel unleashes Atom bomb on competition in 2008. (2009) . (April 2), http://www.ciol.com/semicon/biz-watch/news-reports/intel-unleashes-atom-bomb-on-competition-in-2008/2409117926/0/Google Scholar
• Deneckere R., McAfee R. P. Damaged goods. J. Econom. Management Strategy (1996) 5(2):149–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan R., Freimer M., Seidmann A. Organizing distribution channels for information goods on the Internet. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):483–495Link, Google Scholar
• Economides N., Flyer F. Compatability and market structure for network goods. (1997) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Eisenmann T., Parker G., Alstyne M. V. Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(10):92–101Google Scholar
• Gabszewicz J. J., Shaked A., Sutton J., Thisse J.-F. Segmenting the market: The monopolist's optimal product mix. J. Econom. Theory (1986) 39(2):273–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jing B. Market segmentation for information goods with network externalities. (2003) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Pespect. (1994) 8(2):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee D., Mendelson H. Adoption of information technology under network effects. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(4):395–413Link, Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Grube U. Strategic choice of quality when quality is costly: The persistence of the high-quality advantage. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(2):372–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E.Winners, Losers and Microsoft (1999) (The Independent Institute, Oakland, CA) Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P. Pricing damaged goods. Economics (2007) no. 2007-1). http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/journalarticles/2007-1Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Motta M. Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. J. Indust. Econom. (1993) 41(2):113–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G. G., Van Alstyne M. W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1494–1504Link, Google Scholar
• Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Natural oligopolies. Econometrica (1983) 51(5):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Spence A. M. Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J. Econom. (1975) 6(2):417–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1660–1673Link, Google Scholar
• Tirole J.The Theory of Industrial Organization (1988) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wasserman E. Microsoft's online test. San Jose Mercury News (1997) September 15):E1Google Scholar
• Wei X., Nault B. R. Vertically differentiated information goods: Monopoly power through versioning. (2008) . Working paper, University of Calgary, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Wei X., Nault B. R. Monopoly versioning of information goods when consumers have group tastes. (2009) . Working paper, University of Calgary, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Wu S., Chen P., Anandalingam G. Fighting information goods piracy with versioning. Proc. 24th Annual Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta) Google Scholar